Duty to Defend in Litigation: Strategic Insights for Policyholders and Insurers

Adrian C. Azer
Adrian C. Azer
Haynes Boone

Adrian Azer exclusively represents corporate policyholders in a variety of complex insurance coverage matters. Clients seek Adrian’s representation in connection with insurance recovery for cybersecurity breaches and mass tort claims, disputes over general liability coverage for various toxic tort and environmental claims, and disputes over directors’ and officers’ coverage. Adrian also counsels’ clients in bankers professional liability (BPL) matters.

Kevin V. Small
Kevin V. Small
Hunton

Kevin is a commercial litigator focusing on insurance coverage disputes and counseling on behalf of policyholders. His educational background and prior experience as an insurance broker and advisor provide him with a deep understanding of the insurance industry, enhancing his ability to represent policyholders across a broad spectrum of policies.

Live Video-Broadcast: July 9, 2025

1.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

This CLE program provides a comprehensive and practical run-through of the insurer’s duty to defend, with a focus on high-stakes commercial litigation. Participants will explore the critical legal distinctions between defense and indemnity obligations, the standards that govern when a duty to defend is triggered, and the evolving strategic implications of reservation of rights. The session also covers the complexities of the tripartite relationship, the legal and ethical necessity of independent counsel, and the consequences insurers face when they fail to meet their defense obligations. Through jurisdictional comparisons, analysis of recent case law, and discussion of emerging risks such as cyber claims and AI-influenced decision-making this program equips policyholder and insurer counsel with the tools to navigate one of the most consequential aspects of liability insurance litigation.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Duty to defend
  • When the duty is triggered: Legal framework and jurisdictional variations
  • Reservation of rights and strategic implications
  • Conflicts, Cumis counsel, and control of defense
  • Litigation risks for breach of duty to defend
  • Navigating complex claims and emerging trends

Date / Time: July 9, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 2:40 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 1:40 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 12:40 am Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 11:40 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Adrian C. Azer | Haynes Boone

Adrian Azer exclusively represents corporate policyholders in a variety of complex insurance coverage matters. Clients seek Adrian’s representation in connection with insurance recovery for cybersecurity breaches and mass tort claims, disputes over general liability coverage for various toxic tort and environmental claims, and disputes over directors’ and officers’ coverage. Adrian also counsels’ clients in bankers professional liability (BPL) matters.

Adrian has represented public and private companies, non-profit entities, and government contractors, and has litigated against insurers in state and federal courts across the nation and in various arbitration tribunals. Having worked as a bankruptcy litigator for seven years, he has particular skill navigating insurance issues within the context of bankruptcy proceedings. Adrian is representing the Boy Scouts of America in connection with insurance coverage for claims of alleged sexual abuse.

Adrian is frequently called upon to write about insurance topics, including but not limited to several articles about issues related to COVID-19. Adrian’s articles on cyber insurance have been published in Inside Counsel magazine and in Law360.

 

Kevin V. Small | Hunton

Kevin is a commercial litigator focusing on insurance coverage disputes and counseling on behalf of policyholders. His educational background and prior experience as an insurance broker and advisor provide him with a deep understanding of the insurance industry, enhancing his ability to represent policyholders across a broad spectrum of policies. Kevin regularly represents clients in connection with claims under policies providing coverage for commercial property, cyber, builders’ risk, D&O, E&O, general liability, and representations and warranties. He also represents clients in professional liability matters, such as insurance broker malpractice.

Kevin frequently provides thought leadership on insurance issues. He writes extensively on insurance coverage, presents to industry professionals, and has been quoted in prominent publications. He is also a contributor to the Firm’s Insurance Recovery Blog.

While in law school, Kevin served as a judicial intern for the Honorable Cathy Waldor, USMJ, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and as a legal intern in the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey.

Before law school, Kevin studied Risk Management and Insurance at Temple University, which laid the foundation for his career in the insurance industry. He then worked for a leading risk management and insurance broking firm, where he advised Fortune 500 clients on structuring sophisticated risk management programs, brokered the insurance components, and serviced all risk management needs. This educational and professional background provides him with a deep understanding of the insurance industry, equipping him with unique insights and strategic advantages in handling complex coverage issues and disputes.

Agenda

I. Duty to defend | 1:00pm – 1:15pm

  • Duty to defend vs. duty to indemnify
  • Origins in common law and modern interpretations in commercial insurance
  • Strategic significance in early stages of litigation

II. When the duty is triggered: Legal framework and jurisdictional variations | 1:15pm – 1:30pm

  • The “eight corners” or “four corners” rule
  • Use of extrinsic evidence to trigger or deny defense
  • Comparing insurer-friendly and policyholder-friendly jurisdictions
  • How policy wording and endorsements influence the trigger

III. Reservation of rights and strategic implications | 1:30pm – 1:45pm

  • Structuring effective reservation of rights letters
  • When and how to disclaim coverage
  • The impact of reservations on control of defense and conflicts of interest
  • Reimbursement rights and insurer attempts to recover defense costs

IV. Conflicts, Cumis counsel, and control of defense | 1:45pm – 2:00pm

  • Managing the tripartite relationship (insurer, insured, and defense counsel)
  • When independent (Cumis) counsel is required or advisable
  • Ethical and strategic risks in defending under reservation
  • Cost-sharing and rate-setting disputes

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

V. Litigation risks for breach of duty to defend | 2:10pm – 2:25pm

  • Bad faith exposure for wrongful denial of defense
  • Damages recoverable by insureds, including attorney’s fees and settlement costs
  • Estoppel and preclusion doctrines arising from breach
  • Key case law trends across jurisdictions

VI. Navigating complex claims and emerging trends | 2:25pm – 2:40pm

  • Handling mixed claims with both covered and uncovered allegations
  • Multijurisdictional and cross-border considerations
  • Duty to defend in cyber, privacy, and environmental claims
  • AI and evolving methods for automated claims handling and defense triggers

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts Thu, July 17, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Single Member LLCs: Avoiding Risks and Seizing Opportunities
Single Member LLCs: Avoiding Risks and Seizing Opportunities Thu, July 17, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
PTSD 101: What attorneys should know (2024 Edition)
PTSD 101: What attorneys should know (2024 Edition) Fri, July 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Microsoft Excel for Lawyers (2024 Edition)
Microsoft Excel for Lawyers (2024 Edition) Tue, July 22, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Obtaining and Using Social Media Evidence (2025 Edition)
Obtaining and Using Social Media Evidence (2025 Edition) Mon, July 28, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Microsoft Copilot AI tool for Lawyers (Part 2)
Microsoft Copilot AI tool for Lawyers (Part 2) Thu, July 31, 2025
Live Webcast