The Litigator’s Guide to Evidentiary Objections and Ethical Advocacy: When to Raise Them, How to Preserve the Record, and What to Avoid

Ronald J. Rychlak
Richard D. Friedman
Robert Neary
Arthur D. Burger
Ronald J. Rychlak | University of Mississippi School of Law
Richard D. Friedman | University of Michigan Law School
Robert Neary | Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton
Arthur D. Burger | Jackson & Campbell, P.C.

Re-Broadcast: July 24, 2026

3 hour CLE

Tuition: $245.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Every litigator knows the rules of evidence, but the difference between a clean appellate record and a waived argument turns on execution under pressure—when to object, how to phrase it, and when staying silent serves the client better. This program pairs the foundational mechanics of evidentiary objections with the ethical exposure that shadows them.

Across two sessions, attorneys work through relevance, hearsay, opinion testimony, authentication disputes, and the probative-versus-prejudicial balance, then move to deposition objections, motions in limine, continuing objections, and the proper form for offers of proof.

The second session confronts the ethical hazards that attach to evidentiary strategy—spoliation, inadvertent production of privileged material, witness preparation limits, false testimony, “speaking objections,” and the prohibition on asserting personal views. Grounded in the Federal Rules of Evidence, the program equips litigators to preserve the record, avoid common discovery missteps, and defend their conduct against scrutiny from both opposing counsel and the bench.

What Will You Learn

Attorneys will learn to make and respond to evidentiary objections involving relevance, hearsay, witness qualifications, and authentication while preserving the record for appeal in trial and pretrial settings.

What Will You Gain

Attorneys gain practical guidance on ethical hazards tied to evidentiary strategy, including spoliation, privileged communications, witness preparation, false testimony, and the prohibition on asserting personal views.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Hearsay recognition
    Recognizing and dealing with hearsay issues that arise during trial and pretrial proceedings.
  • Authentication disputes
    Resolving difficult authentication issues when establishing the foundation for real evidence.
  • Deposition objections
    Making objections at deposition and properly stating offers of proof.
  • Privilege protection
    Protecting privileged communications and handling inadvertent production of privileged material.
  • Spoliation compliance
    Ensuring compliance with discovery obligations and confronting spoliation issues at trial.
  • Witness preparation
    Ethical considerations in witness preparation and handling potentially false testimony.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: July 24, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 4:20 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 3:20 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 2:20 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 1:20 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Prof. Ronald J. Rychlak | University of Mississippi School of Law

Ronald J. Rychlak, Distinguished University Professor and Jamie L. Whitten Chair in Law and Government, has been on the law school faculty since 1987. In 2019 he received the university’s highest research and publication recognition, the “Distinguished Research and Creative Achievement Award” based upon his reputation for scholarly activity and leadership roles in professional societies. In 2023, he received the Algernon Sydney Sullivan Award, the University’s highest award in honor of service, for “placing service to others and the community before oneself, while embodying the qualities of honesty, morality, ethics, integrity, responsibility, determination, courage, and compassion.” In 2024, he was voted “Outstanding Law Professor” by the student body.

For thirteen years, Ron served as the law school’s Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, and since 2007 he has served as the university’s Faculty Athletic Representative and chair of the University’s standing committee on Intercollegiate Athletics. Since 2000, he has served as legal advisor to the Holy See’s mission to the United Nations. He is secretary of the Executive Committee of the Southeastern Conference and serves on the Standing University Committee on Athletic Compliance, which he chaired for almost 10 years.

Ron is a graduate of Wabash College (BA 1980, cum laude) and Vanderbilt University School of Law (JD 1983, Order of the Coif). Prior to joining the faculty, he practiced law with Jenner & Block in Chicago and served as a clerk to Judge Harry Wellford of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. He is the past-president of the Southeastern Association of Law Schools, chair of the Mississippi Advisory Committee to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, and a member of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s Criminal Law Reform Committee. He serves on editorial boards of The Gaming Law Review and Cluny Media. He also serves on advisory boards for Ave Maria Law School, the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, The Catholic Bar Association, and the Society of Catholic Social Scientists. He is a member of the Order of Merlin Shield in the International Brotherhood of Magicians.

Ron is the author, co-author, or editor of twelve books and over 100 articles. The Congregation for the Causes of Saints at the Vatican called his book, Hitler, the War, and the Pope “definitive” in its response to charges made against the leader of the Catholic Church during World War II. He has been published in Notre Dame Law Review, UCLA Law Review, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and numerous other periodicals and journals. Media appearances include CNN, ABC, Fox News, National Geographic TV; The Military Channel; PBS radio; Coast to Coast with George Noory; C-SPAN; and more.

 

Richard D. Friedman | University of Michigan Law School

Richard D. Friedman is the Alene and Allan F. Smith Professor of Law and an expert on evidence and US Supreme Court history. He also is one of a few scholars developing a new field that examines sports and games as legal systems.

Friedman is the general editor of The New Wigmore, a multivolume treatise on evidence. His textbook, The Elements of Evidence, is now in its fourth edition, and he is coauthor of Park & Friedman’s Evidence: Cases and Materials, now in its 13th edition, Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials (with Julian Mortenson), and The Jurisprudence of Sport: Sports and Games as Legal Systems (with Mitchell Berman). He also has written many law review articles and essays.

In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the US Supreme Court radically transformed the law governing the right of an accused to “be confronted with the witnesses against him” by adopting a “testimonial” approach, which Friedman had long advocated. He now maintains the Confrontation Blog to comment on related issues and developments, and he has successfully argued two follow-up cases, Hammon v. Indiana and Briscoe v. Virginia, in the Supreme Court.

After his clerkship, Friedman practiced law in New York City. He joined the Michigan Law faculty in 1988 from Cardozo Law School. He is a 2010 recipient of the Patriot Award from the Washtenaw County Bar Association and the 2023 recipient of the John Henry Wigmore Award for Lifetime Achievement, presented by the Association of American Law Schools.

 

Robert Neary | Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton

Robert Neary is a distinguished attorney with extensive experience in complex commercial litigation, class action lawsuits, antitrust law, ERISA, product liability, and consumer protection, among other areas. He represents both plaintiffs and defendants in a diverse array of cases, practicing in both state and federal courts, including trial experience in nationwide class action litigation. Robert’s litigation experience runs the gamut and includes a lead role on over twenty successful nationwide class actions against major mortgage lenders and servicers involving their force-placed insurance practices; representing patients in ERISA litigation against health insurers over the denial of life-saving cancer treatments; representing consumers in vehicle defect cases; nationwide antitrust matters involving algorithmic pricing; representing businesses in breach of contract and tortious interference litigation; and representing a former NFL player against various financial brokers before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel. Robert’s experience allows him to skillfully navigate the complexities of large-scale disputes, ensuring that the rights and interests of his clients are vigorously prosecuted or defended.

With a reputation for excellence in the legal community, Robert has successfully represented clients in high-stakes disputes and is respected by both colleagues and opposing counsel for his legal judgement and litigation strategy and his keen understanding of the intricacies of the law. His commitment to the legal profession extends beyond the courtroom, as he actively participates in Florida Bar and the American Bar Association committees.

Robert regularly shares his insights and expertise as a speaker on various CLE panels, contributing to the ongoing education of his peers. Additionally, he has authored several publications on a wide range of legal topics, demonstrating his thought leadership and dedication to the advancement of legal knowledge. Robert is a contributing author of the Class Action Strategy & Practice Guide (Elizabeth J. Cabraser & Jocelyn D. Larkin eds., American Bar Association 2d ed. 2025), a perennial bestseller publication of the American Bar Association.

With a client-focused approach and a track record of success, Robert Neary is a formidable advocate, navigating the complexities of the law with skill and integrity, ensuring that his clients’ rights and interests are thoroughly represented.

 

Arthur D. Burger_FedBarArthur D. Burger | Jackson & Campbell, P.C.

Mr. Burger is a national leader in legal ethics, legal malpractice, and the law governing lawyers. He has been representing prominent law firms and lawyers for over two decades. Selected repeatedly as a Best Lawyer® in Ethics and Professional Responsibility by Best Lawyers of America© and as a Super Lawyer® in Professional Liability Defense, Art litigates in the areas of legal malpractice, fiduciary duties, motions to disqualify, internal law firm disputes, and Bar disciplinary proceedings. He also serves as outside counsel to law firms and provides guidance regarding potential conflicts of interest and other ethical dilemmas.

In addition to his experience as a practitioner, Art has a deep background in the jurisprudence of ethics law. He was a member of the Editorial Board of the ABA/Bloomberg Law-Lawyers’ Manual on Professional Conduct and is an Adjunct Professor at the Antonin Scalia Law School of George Mason University, teaching a night class in Professional Responsibility. He was a member of the ten-person American Bar Association (ABA) Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility from 2014 to 2017; an elected District of Columbia Bar Delegate to the ABA House of Delegates from 2011 to 2012, where he worked with the ABA Ethics 20/20 Commission; a member of the District of Columbia Bar Legal Ethics Committee from 2003 to 2009; a member of the District of Columbia Bar Rules of Professional Conduct Review Committee from 1998 to 2004; and he has taught numerous District of Columbia Bar continuing legal education courses (CLE) on legal ethics and has lectured around the country.

Art also serves as an expert witness on legal ethics and the standard of care for lawyers. In Diamond Resorts vs. Newton Group Transfers, LLC, 2022 WL 1642865 (S.D. Fla. 2022), the court found him “more than qualified to give his expert opinion in matters of legal ethics.”

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Evidentiary Objections and Record Preservation | 1:00pm – 3:10pm

Litigators address the foundational rules and strategic considerations for relevance, hearsay, opinion testimony, authentication disputes, and balancing probative value against prejudicial impact.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Attorneys cover objections at deposition, in limine objections and motions, continuing objections, proper form for offers of proof, and common discovery mistakes creating evidentiary problems.

BREAK | 3:10pm – 3:20pm

SESSION 2 – Ethical Boundaries in Courtroom Objections and Attorney Conduct | 3:20pm – 4:20pm

Attorneys examine discovery compliance, spoliation, privileged communications, witness preparation, false testimony, speaking objections, and the prohibition on asserting personal views.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Approved For On-Demand Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes, 60 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Nevada

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2. General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Dual

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Virginia

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General Hours, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3.5 General

Ethics credits can ONLY be earned through Live-Webcast programs, the Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners does not approve Ethics through On-Demand sessions.
West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, July 9, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy Thu, July 16, 2026
Live Webcast
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, July 22, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, July 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay