House v. NCAA: Shaping the Future of Student-Athlete Rights

Christopher M. Brolley
Callan G. Stein
Michael S. Lowe
Christopher M. Brolley | Troutman Pepper Locke
Callan G. Stein | Troutman Pepper Locke
Michael S. Lowe | Troutman Pepper Locke

Live Video-Broadcast: April 17, 2025

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

House v. NCAA is a landmark case involving college athletics with significant implications that may alter the NCAA’s long-standing restrictions on student-athlete compensation. The potential settlement, subject to final approval on April 7, 2025, marks a pivotal shift in the landscape of college athletics and underscores the evolving nature of student-athlete rights. While settlement is imminent (but not guaranteed), the terms of the agreement may set a precedent for future litigation concerning athlete compensation, antitrust laws, employment status and unionization of student-athletes, and Title IX. Join Troutman Pepper Locke attorneys, Callan Stein, Michael Lowe, and Christopher Brolley, as they discuss House v. NCAA and what is likely to come after the final approval hearing in April.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE. 

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Background of House v. NCAA
  • Impact of settlement on college athletics
  • Remaining legal issues (antitrust, Title IX, employment status) even after settlement approval

Date / Time: April 17, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Christopher M. Brolley_FedBarChristopher M. Brolley | Troutman Pepper Locke

Chris’ diverse practice includes the representation of pharmaceutical, medical device, agricultural, and manufacturing companies involving mass tort, personal injury, and wrongful death claims. With experience in federal and state courts across the U.S. — including Philadelphia County’s Mass Tort Program — Chris is also involved in disputes arising out of breach of contract and corporate governance.

Chris advises higher educational institutions of all sizes, including colleges and universities, on Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compliance issues. He provides comprehensive guidance on permissible and impermissible NIL activities and navigating state NIL laws, NCAA Bylaws, and other NCAA policies. Chris creates and implements tailored strategies for mitigating the potential risk of NCAA and state attorney general enforcement activity. He co hosts the firm’s “Highway to NIL” podcast that discusses the legal landscape and developments in NIL law.

Chris maintains active pro bono practice. He represents veterans seeking benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs in connection with their appeals before The Board of Veterans’ Appeals, working closely with the National Veterans Legal Services Program. Chris also represents clients involved with the Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project (MAIP).

While in law school, Chris served as a judicial extern for the Hon. Mark A. Kearney in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Chris is an active member of the American Bar Association and Hispanic Bar Association of Pennsylvania.

 

Callan G. Stein_FedBarCallan G. Stein | Troutman Pepper Locke

Cal is an experienced trial attorney who represents clients in complex civil, white-collar criminal, and RICO litigation matters and state and federal government investigations. As a seasoned trial attorney, he has served for years as a faculty member for the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) and the firm’s trial advocacy program for associates.

With a background as a trial attorney in both civil and criminal matters, Cal is uniquely positioned to handle litigation involving the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). He has extensive experience defending businesses and individuals across a broad spectrum of industries who have been accused of either civil or criminal RICO violations. Cal has successfully tried and arbitrated RICO cases that alleged all manners of racketeering activity, including mail fraud, fraud wire, money laundering, embezzlement, homicide, and violations of federal statutes such as the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act and the Controlled Substances Act. Cal hosts the “RICO Report,” a podcast series devoted entirely to the RICO statute.

Cal also handles a wide range of commercial litigation, including fraud, breach of contract, and business tort cases. He frequently litigates these types of cases for clients who operate in highly regulated industries, including hospitals, clinical laboratories, and other health care providers, pharmaceutical and medical device companies, insurance providers, and institutes of higher education and academic medical centers. These cases often take the form of breach of contract litigation (e.g., provider agreements), whistleblower/qui tam lawsuits (alleging violations of the False Claims Act), or civil RICO cases. Cal is also experienced representing doctors and other health care providers in disputes involving medical staff bylaws, peer review and physician discipline hearings, utilization review management issues, and fraud research.

In his white-collar criminal practice, Cal defends businesses and individuals facing government investigations conducted by state and federal prosecutors and administrative agencies. In the health care and life sciences industries, he regularly represents physicians, physician practices and other providers, hospitals, CLIA laboratories, nursing homes and other long-term care facilities, pharmacists and pharmacies (including compounding pharmacies), and pharmaceutical and medical device companies facing government investigations or enforcement actions involving the False Claims Act (FCA), the Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law, other health care fraud and abuse laws, the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), drug diversion laws, public nuisance claims, and unfair and deceptive marketing suits.

Cal also handles FCA and fraud cases involving other industry sectors, including in connection with Covid-19 programs such as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) operated by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). In 2024, Cal won summary judgment for a client accused of PPP fraud in the first PPP fraud qui tam case to reach the dispositive motion stage in the U.S.

Cal proactively works with clients to help mitigate potential compliance issues and government actions. He develops and implements risk mitigation strategies such as enforcing, updating, and enhancing corporate compliance programs, and regularly conducts internal investigations of complaints and other internal issues to prevent them from ripening into government investigations or whistleblower lawsuits. Drawing from an in-depth knowledge of the methods used by prosecutors and regulators, Cal investigates allegations and advises clients on possible remediation strategies for even the most complex and sensitive issues.

Cal also frequently represents and advises higher education clients, particularly in areas related to collegiate athletics and Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights and compliance. Cal provides NIL compliance advice and internal investigation services to major universities, including those that participate in Division I football and basketball, and likewise advises schools on athletics contracts, conference affiliations, conference realignment, and other NCAA related issues. Cal also represents and advises businesses on NIL contracts, as well as NIL collectives on formation and compliance matters. Cal hosts the firm’s “Highway to NIL” podcast that discusses the legal landscape and developments in NIL law.

 

Michael S. Lowe_FedBarMichael S. Lowe | Troutman Pepper Locke

Michael brings unique insights and practical guidance from nearly 25 years as a federal prosecutor to his representation of pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and other clients in products liability and class action litigation, federal criminal and civil governmental investigations and actions (including SEC, DOJ, FTC, and other agency investigations), state attorneys general investigations and actions, and civil False Claims Act (FCA) lawsuits. He regularly handles matters in state and federal courts throughout the U.S., and his experience includes a particularly long trial-to-verdict record in Los Angeles and Philadelphia courts.

Michael’s diverse litigation experience includes defending clients in cases involving medical device products liability, the FCA and its state analogs, the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), unfair and deceptive trade practices and false advertising, consumer class action matters, and securities fraud. He handles cases in a variety of sectors, including health care, cryptocurrency, and financial services.

Michael is particularly well suited to handle all aspects of sensitive internal investigations for clients, having spent the last 12 years of his 25-year career as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — first as assistant U.S. attorney, then as senior investigation counsel in the Economic Crimes Section. He draws on this background to handle complex fraud cases from the inception of the investigation through trial; conduct internal investigations for companies in response to whistleblower and kickback allegations, and other corporate misconduct; and deal with DOJ, the SEC, and state and other federal agencies in connection with responses to grand jury subpoenas and civil investigative demands (CIDs).

During his 25 years as a federal prosecutor, Michael developed deep experience investigating and prosecuting various types of fraud, including securities, crypto, Covid, and PPP fraud. He regularly interfaced with the FBI, SEC, HUD, HHS OIG, IRS CID, Homeland Security, and the DOJ Tax Division, as well as DOJ Civil Division attorneys conducting concurrent civil investigations. Michael also provided guidance and strategic advice to federal prosecutors investigating complex frauds in his role as senior investigation counsel.

Michael’s experience as both a civil litigator and former federal prosecutor includes both civil and criminal RICO. His tenure as a federal prosecutor began in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California in Los Angeles, where he spent more than 13 years. During that time he was lead prosecutor on the largest gang prosecution in U.S. history, personally prosecuted more than 100 individuals charged with RICO violations, and played an integral role in multiple capital murder prosecutions.

Michael regularly taught trial advocacy to fellow prosecutors and wrote the book on federal wiretaps, authoring the chapter on wiretaps for the most recent edition of the Federal Narcotics Prosecution Manual published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This publication is relied upon by all federal prosecutors engaged in narcotics prosecutions in the U.S.

Michael is experienced in the NIL and higher education space. He currently represents an NCAA Division I athletic conference in connection with the settlement of the House antitrust litigation, as well as NIL issues and conference policies and procedures. He also has provided advice to an NCAA Division I university in connection with NIL and has experience with investigations of potential NIL violations. In addition to representing clients in this area, Michael frequently writes, speaks, and presents cutting-edge NIL issues.

Agenda

I. Background of House v. NCAA | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

II. Impact of settlement on college athletics | 2:10pm – 2:45pm

III. Remaining legal issues (antitrust, Title IX, employment status) even after settlement approval | 2:45pm – 3:10pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate Wed, April 2, 2025
Live Webcast
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition)
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition) Thu, April 3, 2025
Live Webcast
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition)
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition) Thu, April 10, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific)
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific) Fri, April 11, 2025
Live Webcast
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win Wed, April 16, 2025
Live Webcast
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives Fri, April 18, 2025
Live Webcast
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition)
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
Live Webcast