Using AI to Analyze and Respond to an Opposing Argument

Michael Colantuono
Michael Colantuono | Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, P.C.

Michael is certified by the California State Bar as a Specialist in Appellate Law and is President of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers, an association of a bit more than 100 of the most distinguished appellate lawyers in California. He serves on the California Judicial Council’s Appellate Advisory Committee and its Appellate Caseflow Working Group.

On-Demand: March 24, 2025

1.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, offering powerful tools to enhance efficiency and precision in drafting and discovery. This program will explore how AI can assist in legal opposition drafting by analyzing materials, identifying weaknesses, and strengthening arguments. Attendees will gain practical insights into leveraging AI-driven analysis to refine legal drafting, bolster opposition drafting in trial and appellate courts, and optimize discovery processes. Through real-world applications and expert guidance, this session provides a comprehensive understanding of AI’s role in modern legal practice and its potential to enhance advocacy and decision-making.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What’s the goal of an opposition?
  • How can AI assist in achieving it
  • By analyzing the material to be opposed
  • By strengthening the opposition

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Michael Colantuono | Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, P.C.

Michael has specialized in municipal law since 1989. He is certified by the California State Bar as a Specialist in Appellate Law and is President of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers, an association of a bit more than 100 of the most distinguished appellate lawyers in California.

He is an Elected Member of the American Law Institute, the leading independent organization in the United States producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize, and otherwise improve the law. He has argued 14 cases in the California Supreme Court and appeared in all six of the California District Courts of Appeal, as well as trial courts around the State. He serves on the California Judicial Council’s Appellate Advisory Committee and its Appellate Caseflow Working Group.

Michael has expertise in a broad range of areas of concern to local governments in California, including constitutional law, land use regulation, open meetings, elections, municipal litigation, conflicts of interest, public utilities, LAFCO issues, inverse condemnation, cannabis regulation, and a wide range of public finance issues involving taxes, assessments, fees and charges.

Michael is perhaps California’s leading expert on the law of local government revenues, briefing 18 cases on that subject in the California Supreme Court since 2004. The Daily Journal named him a California Lawyer of the Year in inverse condemnation law for his win in City of Oroville v. Superior Court (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1091, government’s first win in that court in this subject area in decades. California Chief Justice Ronald M. George presented him with the 2010 Public Lawyer of the Year Award on behalf of the California State Bar. Two successive Speakers of the California Assembly appointed him to the Board of Trustees of the California Bar, the state agency which regulates the practice of law in California. His fellow Trustees elected him Treasurer and President of the Bar and the California Supreme Court appointed him as Chair of its Board of Trustees.

Michael currently serves as City Attorney for the City of Grass Valley and General Counsel for the Grass Valley Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency, the Calaveras County LAFCO, the Oak Tree Park and Recreation District, the Peardale-Chicago Park, Higgins, Ophir Hill, Penn Valley, and Rough & Ready Fire Districts and the Camarillo Healthcare District. He previously served as City Attorney of Auburn (2005–2019), Barstow (1997–2004), Calabasas (2003–2012), Cudahy (1994–1999), La Habra Heights (1994–2004), Monrovia (1999–2002), and Sierra Madre (2004–2006), as General Counsel to the Auburn (2005–2019), Barstow (1997–2004) and Sierra Madre (2004–2006) Redevelopment Agencies, and as General Counsel of the Big Bear City Community Services District (1994–2001).

Michael assisted the Legislative Analyst’s Office in the impartial analysis of Proposition 218 and co-chaired the committee which drafted what became the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act of 1997. He also chaired the committees which drafted the League of California Cities’ Prop. 26 and 218 Implementation Guide.

Michael was elected by his peers to serve as President of the City Attorneys’ Department of the League of California Cities in 2003–2004. He now represents the Department on Cal Cities’ Board of Directors.

Michael was appointed by the Rules Committee of the California State Assembly to the Commission on Local Governance in the 21st Century. The Commission was formed to study the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act and the bulk of its recommendations became law. Michael was deeply involved in drafting both the committee report and the statute.

Michael graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University (BA 1983) and received his law degree from University of California, Berkeley School of Law (JD 1988), graduating first in his class. While in law school, he was an Articles Editor of the California Law Review and became a member of the Order of the Coif upon graduation. Michael was law clerk to the Honorable James R. Browning, Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in 1988– 1989.

He taught Administrative Law as an adjunct Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 1995 and is a frequent speaker and trainer on a wide range of public law topics.

Agenda

I. What’s the goal of an opposition? | 1:00pm – 1:30pm

II. How can AI assist in achieving it | 1:30pm – 2:00pm

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

III. By analyzing the material to be opposed | 2:10pm – 2:25pm

IV. By strengthening the opposition | 2:25pm – 2:40pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Iowa

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Indiana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 NLS Credit

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Law Practice Management

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Law Office Management

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 Ethics / Professionalism

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 Law Practice Programming

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Other (Office Management)

Receive CLE credit in Washignton via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 Law Practice Management

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate Wed, April 2, 2025
Live Webcast
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition)
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition) Thu, April 3, 2025
Live Webcast
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition)
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition) Thu, April 10, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific)
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific) Fri, April 11, 2025
Live Webcast
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win Wed, April 16, 2025
Live Webcast
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition) Fri, April 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition)
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition) Fri, April 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives Fri, April 18, 2025
Live Webcast