Depositions and Digital Evidence: Strategies for Effective Litigation

Mihai Vrasmasu
Lori-Ann Ridley
Paul Leopold
Mihai Vrasmasu | Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Lori-Ann Ridley | Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Paul Leopold | KoonsFuller, P.C

Live Video-Broadcast: April 4, 2025

2 hour CLE

This program is available to All-Access Pass Members.
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ live webinars.
Learn More

Program Summary

Session I - Practical Tips for Virtual and In-Person Depositions - Mihai Vrasmasu & Lori-Ann Ridley

In this presentation, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP attorneys Mihai Vrasmasu and Lori-Ann Ridley will discuss various strategic considerations, as well as practical tips and techniques that you should keep in mind when conducting in-person and remote video depositions.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Understanding the Deposition Landscape
  • Pre-Deposition Preparation
  • Tips for Conducting an Effective Deposition
  • Post-Deposition Review

Session II - Digital Evidence Demystified: Navigating Smartphone Data in Court – Paul Leopold

Smartphone data includes all aspects of digital evidence, including photos, videos, text messages, AI - generated media, tracking apps, and more. In this presentation, you will learn how to introduce, admit, and object to this digital evidence in hearings and at trial.

Knowing and understanding what data is on a smartphone; presenting that data as evidence; admitting and objecting to that evidence.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • How to introduce, admit, and object to this digital evidence in hearings and at trial
  • Knowing and understanding what data is on a smartphone
  • Presenting that data as evidence
  • Admitting and objecting to that evidence

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: April 4, 2025

  • 12:50 pm – 3:00 pm Eastern
  • 11:50 am – 2:00 pm Central
  • 10:50 am – 1:00 pm Mountain
  • 9:50 am – 12:00 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Speaker_Mihai Vrasmasu_FedBarMihai Vrasmasu | Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

Mihai Vrasmasu is a partner in the Miami, Florida, office of Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP. As one of the founders of Shook, Hardy & Bacon’s pharmaceutical and medical device practice in Miami, Mihai was instrumental in growing it into one of the top pharma practices in South Florida and gaining favorable results for clients such as Bausch & Lomb, Pfizer, Roche, Boston Scientific, Bayer, Zimmer and Stryker.

Mihai also provides litigation risk assessments and other consulting services to surgical robot manufacturers. Over the years, Mihai has taken and defended countless depositions of various witnesses—including medical experts and treating physicians—in high-stakes cases across the country.

 

Speaker_Lori-Ann Ridley_FedBarLori-Ann Ridley | Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

Lori-Ann Ridley is an associate attorney in the Miami, Florida, office of Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, focusing on product liability litigation. In her practice, she has gained valuable experience taking a variety of depositions, utilizing this critical discovery tool to strengthen her clients’ cases. Lori-Ann has conducted depositions of multiple fact witnesses, honing her skills and developing effective questioning strategies to uncover key information that supports her clients’ positions.

As an active participant in firm training and CLE programs, Lori-Ann is passionate about developing her deposition skills and sharing her insights with fellow attorneys. Her practical experience and commitment to continuous learning make her an emerging resource for those seeking to refine their litigation and deposition techniques.

 

Speaker_Paul Leopold_FedBarPaul Leopold | KoonsFuller, P.C

Paul M. Leopold is double board certified in both Family Law and Civil Appellate Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. While focusing his practice on family law appeals, he also helps trial counsel with all aspects of a case from beginning to end.

He has successfully represented clients in both state and federal trial and appellate courts.

Agenda

Session I – Practical Tips for Virtual and In-Person Depositions | 12:50pm – 1:50pm

  • Understanding the Deposition Landscape
    • The pros and cons of the three main deposition types (in-person, virtual, and telephonic)
    • Should you video record the deposition?
  • Pre-Deposition Preparation:
    • Deposition location consideration (in-person and virtual)
    • Technology considerations (platforms, connectivity, and backups)
    • Tips for creating a professional and functional remote environment
    • Effective witness preparation techniques
    • Preparing an outline: defining objectives
    • Preparing exhibits
  • Tips for Conducting an Effective Deposition
    • Who should be in the room with the witness?
    • Remote deposition specific instructions
    • Managing screen-sharing, digital exhibits, and recording testimony
    • Controlling the deposition: set the tone, listen actively, and stay on track
    • Using exhibits strategically
    • Structuring questions: avoid leading, compound, and confusing questions
    • Dealing with Objections: know the rules
    • Handling evasive or combative witnesses
    • Wrapping up effectively: review your outline, ask catch all questions, and clarify ambiguities
    • Exhibit management following conclusion of deposition
  • Post-Deposition Review
    • Review the transcript
    • Evaluate the witness
    • Plan next steps and follow up as necessary

Break | 1:50pm – 2:00pm

Session II – Digital Evidence Demystified: Navigating Smartphone Data in Court | 2:00pm – 3:00pm

  • How to introduce, admit, and object to this digital evidence in hearings and at trial
  • Knowing and understanding what data is on a smartphone
  • Presenting that data as evidence
  • Admitting and objecting to that evidence

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

All courses accredited in Utah must include both ethics credits.
Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal

Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases Thu, March 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition)
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
Live Webcast
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition)
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts Mon, March 24, 2025
Live Webcast
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation Wed, March 26, 2025
Live Webcast
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, March 27, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay