Advising Businesses on AI Agent Risk: Enforceable Policies Under Current Law

Kristie Prinz
Chiara Portner
Bushra Samimi
Kristie Prinz | The Prinz Law Office
Chiara Portner | Lathrop GPM
Bushra Samimi | Lathrop GPM

Live Video-Broadcast: June 25, 2026

1.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

AI agents are not the simple chatbots most vendor contracts were written for. They pull from internal databases, can leak confidential data through compromised tools, and can even enter into agreements on a company's behalf — all without a person approving each step. The legal risk is already here under today's laws. Feeding confidential information into a public AI tool can strip away trade secret protection under the DTSA. The FTC has already set expectations through its cases against Rite Aid and DoNotPay. A hiring tool that screens out protected groups can expose an employer under Title VII. New AI laws in Colorado, California, and Texas apply right now, and the December 2025 federal order does not pause them. Any lawyer whose client uses these agents without a clear policy is working from outdated templates. This class ties each risk to the failure behind it and gives you the practical pieces — approved-tool lists tied to data sensitivity, rules for when a person must sign off, vendor terms to insist on, and IP-ownership language after Thaler v. Perlmutter — so you can build a policy that holds up.

What Will You Learn

Attorneys will learn to identify governance gaps at deployment, map MCP vulnerabilities to breach-notification and negligence exposure, recognize where vendor contracts fail, and draft enforceable corporate AI use policies.

What Will You Gain

Attorneys will gain a practical framework for counseling clients on the full spectrum of AI-related legal risk and the drafting competencies to support a reasonable-care defense.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Agentic AI
    What agentic AI is and why it creates novel legal exposure.
  • MCP architecture
    MCP architecture, documented vulnerabilities, and the legal significance of each.
  • Contract formation
    Contract formation and binding authority under UETA, E-SIGN, and UCC.
  • Trade secrets
    Trade secret waiver under the DTSA from public LLM ingestion.
  • FTC enforcement
    FTC Section 5 enforcement: Rite Aid and DoNotPay consent orders.
  • AI policy
    Approved-tool lists and prohibited-use provisions keyed to data classification tiers.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: June 25, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 2:40 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 1:40 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 12:40 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 11:40 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Kristie Prinz, Founder | The Prinz Law Office

Kristie Prinz is an AI, software, technology, digital health, and intellectual property business lawyer in Silicon Valley who has advised early-stage start-ups and mid-market companies for 28 years. She founded The Prinz Law Office, a boutique Silicon Valley firm with offices in San Jose and Palo Alto. Her clients are primarily in the SaaS, AI, technology, and digital health industries, and she advises them on business transactions involving customers, resellers, suppliers and distributors, business partners, and buyers and sellers, while also maintaining an intellectual property and a privacy practice.

  • Education & Credentials

Kristie graduated from Furman University and Vanderbilt Law School and is licensed to practice law in California and Georgia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Kristie was selected as a Super Lawyer in Northern California in 2024 and 2025, a distinction determined by her peers in the profession.

  • Professional Involvement

A frequent speaker and media contributor on software, AI, technology, digital health, and IP law, Kristie authored “Managing the Legal Risks of Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property and Confidential Information” (Consulting Psychology Journal, 2025) and writes the Silicon Valley Software Law Blog and the Silicon Valley Digital Health Blog. She founded the Silicon Valley Software Advisors Group and the AI Advisors Group, leads the Silicon Valley Virtual I home group within ProVisors (more than 11,000 professionals), and is a member of the Business Section of the American Bar Association, the Business and Privacy Sections of the California Bar Association, and the Privacy and Technology Section of the Georgia Bar Association.

  • Experience

Kristie works with companies across California, in developing U.S. technology hubs, and in overseas markets including Canada, Mexico, Central America, Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, and serves as local IP counsel for a boutique IP firm in Paris, France. Before founding The Prinz Law Office, she practiced in the Palo Alto office of Pennie & Edmonds, LLP and began her career at Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP in Atlanta.

 

Chiara Portner, CIPP/US | Lathrop GPM

Chiara Portner is a Partner at Lathrop GPM, where she serves as outside corporate counsel and an outsourced member of her clients’ legal teams. She helps companies monetize and commercialize their technology, services, and products and advises on privacy and AI compliance. Her practice spans artificial intelligence, intellectual property, and privacy and data security, with a focus on technology transactions, licensing arrangements, and other complex commercial contracts. Chiara represents start-ups, emerging companies, and entrepreneurs as well as mid-market and public companies — including B2B, B2C, and B2B2C businesses ranging from software, AI, mobile app, IoT, and SaaS startups to e-tailers, retail clothing brands, and large public companies.

  • Education & Credentials

Chiara earned her J.D. from Santa Clara University School of Law and her B.A. in Political Science from the University of California, San Diego. She is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US) and has been admitted to the California bar since 2002.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Chiara is the Partner-in-Charge of Lathrop GPM’s Redwood Shores office and Co-Chair of the firm’s Cyber Security and Tech Transactions group.

  • Professional Involvement

Chiara is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and serves on the Licensing and AI Committees of the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO). A frequent author and presenter on privacy and AI, her recent work includes “Compliance with the New CCPA Regulations” (Data Protection Leader, 2026) and “Due Process for the Algorithmically Screened — Illinois Adds New Rules to the AI Hiring Playbook” (DataGuidance, 2026), along with presentations on California privacy law and emerging enforcement developments. She also serves as Philanthropy Liaison for the National Charity League.

  • Experience

Chiara has drafted AI product addenda for a cloud-based developer platform’s generative AI offerings, negotiated agreements licensing AI technologies to a global enterprise software provider, and advised companies on designing and implementing internal AI governance programs and usage policies. She counsels clients on compliant AI product use, data governance, and the protection of trade secrets associated with AI systems, and assists businesses with compliance under new state AI laws. Her broader transactional work includes enterprise SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, OEM, distributor, and reseller agreements, and she has prepared privacy and data security policies addressing the CCPA, GDPR, and other state, federal, and international requirements.

 

Bushra Samimi, CIPP/US | Lathrop GPM

Bushra Samimi is an Associate at Lathrop GPM who assists clients with commercial and technology-based transactions — including SaaS Master Service Agreements, Referral Partner Agreements, Terms of Service, and other related agreements — as well as privacy and data protection compliance matters.

  • Education & Credentials

Bushra earned her J.D. from the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, and her B.A. in Political Economy from the University of California, Berkeley. She holds the CIPP/US certification for U.S. private-sector privacy from the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), the global standard in privacy certification, and has been admitted to the California bar since 2021.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Bushra has contributed to Lathrop GPM’s 2026 Legal Guide to Privacy and Data Security, helping shape the firm’s published guidance on an expanding privacy and cybersecurity regulatory environment. Her CIPP/US certification — the global standard in privacy certification — reflects a recognized command of U.S. private-sector privacy law.

  • Professional Involvement

A member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals, Bushra writes on emerging privacy and data security issues. Her recent client-facing analyses include “CCPA 2026: Navigating the Expanded Consumer Privacy Compliance Requirements for Businesses” and “What Closely Held Businesses Need to Know About Data Privacy and Cybersecurity.”

  • Experience

Bushra is experienced in advising life sciences and technology companies on venture financing, mergers and acquisitions, and capital market transactions. Before joining Lathrop GPM, she served as a privacy consultant at a life sciences company and practiced as an associate at Goodwin Procter.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Drafting an Enforceable Corporate AI Use Policy | 1:00pm – 1:30pm

Draft enforceable AI use policy: approved-tool lists keyed to data classification, human-in-the-loop thresholds, IP-ownership rules after Thaler v. Perlmutter, vendor vetting standards, and incident response built to support a reasonable-care defense.

SESSION 2 – AI Liability: Emerging State Laws, FTC & Title VII Traps | 1:30pm – 2:00pm

This session maps the legal exposure businesses face without a sound AI use policy, covering FTC Section 5 enforcement, state AI compliance obligations, and Title VII risk from AI-driven hiring. Attorneys gain a practical framework for counseling clients on the full spectrum of AI risk.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 3 – Legal Risk from AI Agents and the Current Regulatory Landscape | 2:10pm – 2:40pm

Learn how autonomous agents and MCP turn internal data into third-party disclosures, when an agent binds your client under UETA, E-SIGN, and the UCC, and where privacy and preemption rules already apply.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Wed, June 10, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Professionalism and Civility (2026 Edition)
Professionalism and Civility (2026 Edition) Fri, June 19, 2026
Live Webcast
The AI Chatbot Wiretap Class Action Wave
The AI Chatbot Wiretap Class Action Wave Fri, June 26, 2026
Live Webcast