False Claims Act Materiality: Beyond Escobar and Into New Frontiers

Rachel V. Rose
Rachel V. Rose | Rachel V. Rose – Attorney at Law, PLLC

Rachel V. Rose's background is distinctively multidisciplinary — she worked on Capitol Hill when HIPAA was enacted in 1996 and at HHS during the implementation of the HITECH Act in 2009, giving her firsthand legislative and regulatory insight that few practitioners can claim.

Live Video-Broadcast: May 1, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
All-Access Pass

Free access to all CLE programs w/active subscription. Annual subscription only $395/yr.

Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

What will an attorney learn?

Attorneys will learn how Escobar's holistic materiality standard has been interpreted across federal circuits and applied in a 2026 DOJ indictment.

What will they gain?

Attorneys will gain a framework for analyzing materiality through Supreme Court precedent, circuit court rulings, and live oral arguments.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • FCA Materiality
    The Escobar decision established a holistic approach to materiality under the False Claims Act.
  • Circuit Splits
    Post-Escobar circuit courts have developed competing interpretations of the materiality standard.
  • Oral Arguments
    The Third Circuit heard arguments in U.S. ex rel. Penelow v. Janssen Products LP.
  • Dismissal Motions
    Motions contesting materiality have been used to seek dismissal of False Claims Act cases.
  • DOJ Indictment
    A March 17, 2026 indictment of an Anchorage doctor implicates one prong of materiality.
  • Civil Penalties
    The March 2026 indictment also applied civil penalties under the False Claims Act.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: May 1, 2026

  • 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Eastern
  • 10:00 am – 11:00 am Central
  • 9:00 am – 10:00 am Mountain
  • 8:00 am – 9:00 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Rachel-V.-Rose_Principal-with-Rachel-V.-Rose-–-Attorney-at-Law,-P.L.L.C.Houston,-TX_FedBarRachel V. Rose | Rachel V. Rose – Attorney at Law, PLLC

Rachel V. Rose, JD, MBA is a Houston-based attorney and consultant whose practice spans transactional, compliance, and litigation matters in cybersecurity, healthcare, securities, and Dodd-Frank and False Claims Act whistleblower claims. Her background is distinctively multidisciplinary — she worked on Capitol Hill when HIPAA was enacted in 1996 and at HHS during the implementation of the HITECH Act in 2009, giving her firsthand legislative and regulatory insight that few practitioners can claim. She holds a law degree from Stetson University College of Law, an MBA with minors in healthcare and entrepreneurship from Vanderbilt University, and an Executive Certification in Leadership and Negotiation from Harvard Law School. She is an extensively published author, a sought-after speaker, a recognized expert in healthcare compliance and cybersecurity law, and an Affiliated Member at Baylor College of Medicine’s Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, where she teaches bioethics.

  • Education & Credentials

Rachel holds a Juris Doctor from Stetson University College of Law, a Master of Business Administration with minors in healthcare and entrepreneurship from Vanderbilt University, and an Executive Certification in Leadership and Negotiation from Harvard Law School. This combination of legal, business, and leadership credentials reflects the multidisciplinary foundation of a practice that spans healthcare compliance, cybersecurity, securities law, and whistleblower representation. She is co-editor of the American Health Lawyers Association’s Enterprise Risk Management Handbook for Healthcare Entities (2nd Edition) and coauthor of two ABA publications — The ABCs of ACOs and What Are International HIPAA Considerations? — as well as contributing author to multiple legal and medical reference books.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Rachel has received a remarkable breadth of professional recognition, including consecutive listing in the Texas Bar College, the National Women Trial Lawyers Association’s Top 25, Houstonia Magazine’s Top Lawyers in healthcare, the National Trial Lawyers Association’s Top 100, and SuperLawyers in healthcare. She has also been named 1st Healthcare Compliance’s Top Presenter in both 2019 and 2022. As an Affiliated Member of Baylor College of Medicine’s Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy — where she teaches bioethics — she occupies a distinctive position at the intersection of law, medicine, and ethics. Her Capitol Hill experience during HIPAA’s passage and her HHS tenure during HITECH implementation reflect an early and sustained engagement with the legislative foundations of healthcare privacy law that few practitioners can match.

  • Professional Involvement

Rachel is extensively published, a sought-after conference presenter, and a frequently quoted expert on cybersecurity, healthcare compliance, and whistleblower law. She serves as co-editor of the AHLA’s Enterprise Risk Management Handbook for Healthcare Entities and has co-authored books for the American Bar Association on ACOs and international HIPAA considerations, as well as contributing chapters to legal and medical reference works. She teaches bioethics at Baylor College of Medicine’s Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, bridging legal and clinical perspectives for healthcare professionals. Her work conducting HIPAA Risk Analyses for domestic and international organizations and representing clients in government enforcement matters reflects active engagement with the compliance challenges healthcare and technology organizations face in an evolving regulatory landscape.

  • Experience

Rachel Rose’s career is defined by a rare combination of legislative, regulatory, and private practice experience that spans more than two decades at the intersection of healthcare, cybersecurity, and the law. She was present at two defining moments in U.S. healthcare privacy law — working on Capitol Hill when HIPAA was enacted in 1996 and at HHS when the HITECH Act was being implemented in 2009 — and has built a practice that applies that institutional knowledge to transactional, compliance, and litigation matters for domestic and international clients. Her work includes HIPAA Risk Analyses, government enforcement representation, securities and whistleblower matters, and cybersecurity compliance counseling. Her ABA and AHLA publications, her bioethics teaching at Baylor College of Medicine, her Harvard Executive Certification, and her consecutive national and regional recognition across legal, trial, and compliance communities reflect a career of exceptional depth, versatility, and sustained professional impact.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Materiality, Holistic Approach & Escobar (U.S. Supreme Court) | 2:00pm – 2:25pm

Explore the foundational framework of False Claims Act materiality, including the Supreme Court’s landmark Escobar decision establishing the holistic approach courts use to evaluate government payment decisions in FCA litigation.

SESSION 2 – Post-Escobar Circuit Court Interpretations of Materiality | 2:25pm – 2:35pm

Examine how federal circuit courts have diverged in applying Escobar’s materiality standard, and identify the emerging splits and trends reshaping FCA defense and prosecution strategies across jurisdictions.

SESSION 3 – U.S. ex rel. Penelow et al. v. Janssen Products LP (3rd Cir.) | 2:35pm – 3:45pm

Analyze this pivotal Third Circuit case and its implications for pharmaceutical FCA liability, dissecting how the court applied post-Escobar materiality principles to complex healthcare fraud allegations against a major drug manufacturer.

SESSION 4 – March 17, 2026 DOJ Press Release – Indictment of Anchorage Doctor & Her Husband | 2:45pm – 2:55pm

Unpack how this recent federal indictment illustrates one prong of the materiality standard in action, offering critical insight into DOJ enforcement priorities and real-world FCA exposure for healthcare practitioners and their counsel.

SESSION 5 – Conclusion | 2:55pm – 3:00pm

Synthesize the session’s key materiality principles, circuit court trends, and enforcement developments into a practical framework attorneys can immediately apply when advising clients facing FCA exposure or litigation.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, May 7, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Fri, May 8, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Settlement Ethics in Personal Injury Cases
Settlement Ethics in Personal Injury Cases Thu, May 14, 2026
Live Webcast
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Thu, May 14, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay