Ashish Joshi is the owner and managing partner of Joshi: Attorneys + Counselors. He serves as the lead counsel in high-stakes, complex family law and divorce cases, focusing on issues related to intimate partner violence, parental alienation, child psychological maltreatment, and international child abduction. He has counseled and/or represented clients in state and federal courts across the United States and internationally, including in India, United Kingdom, Canada, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, British Virgin Islands, and China.
Live Video-Broadcast: December 5, 2024
Select Your State Below to View CLE Credit Information
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
Parental alienation is a highly counterintuitive area. Family law professionals—judges, lawyers, children’s representatives, guardian’s ad litem, custody evaluators — are often confounded when dealing with PA cases. Seemingly good measures that may have worked in other family law cases do not work in an alienation situation. For instance, as one domestic relations judge realized: Giving a “speech” from the bench to “get through” to an alienating parent does not result in an epiphany or help the situation. Nor will sending off the kids to “therapy.” But such therapies are known to be ineffective. Not only that, they are known to be potentially harmful – they “validate” an alienated child’s distorted view of the world, encourage the child to express grievances, and give the child some “control” or choice while advising the rejected parent to “listen, empathize, validate, and apologize (or even to ‘find something to apologize for’).” Traditional therapy is contraindicated and typically makes things worse. Even when provided under court order, such therapies are of little benefit.
In addition, some jurisdictions — e.g., Colorado and California — have recently passed legislation that limits the court’s options when it comes to ordering reunification counseling. What are the options when one is faced with legislative or other restraints on reunification options? What interventions work?
It all begins by ensuring that the fact finder — whether a trial judge or a forensic custody evaluator — reaches a finding of PA. Without such finding, a claim of PA is simply a theory in search of facts.
In this 2-part presentation, the attendees will learn about basics of the PA theory, how family courts across the United States have defined the term, what evidence have the courts found persuasive when making findings of PA, and how to put together an effective case of PA in litigation. It all begins with the process of discovery and taking strategic and effective depositions.
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Key topics to be discussed:
Date / Time: December 5, 2024
Closed-captioning available
Ashish Joshi | Joshi Attorneys + Counselors
Ashish Joshi is the owner and managing partner of Joshi: Attorneys + Counselors. He serves as the lead counsel in high-stakes, complex family law and divorce cases, focusing on issues related to intimate partner violence, parental alienation, child psychological maltreatment, and international child abduction. He has counseled and/or represented clients in state and federal courts across the United States and internationally, including in India, United Kingdom, Canada, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, British Virgin Islands, and China.
Mr. Joshi has been admitted to the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States, state bars of New York, Michigan, the District of Columbia, and Gujarat, India. Mr. Joshi serves as a senior editor of Litigation, the flagship journal of the ABA’s Section of Litigation. He is a contributing author to Parental Alienation: Science and Law (Charles C. Thomas, 2020) and author of Litigating Parental Alienation: Evaluating and Presenting an Effective Case in Court (ABA, 2021).
In 2024, the Michigan Supreme Court appointed Mr. Joshi to serve on the Michigan Judicial Council.
I. Fundamentals of PA | 10:00am – 10:30am
II. How the Family Courts have defined the term | 10:30am – 11:00am
Break | 11:00am – 11:10am
III. Relevant and current legal cases | 11:10am – 11:40am
IV. Evidence that courts have found to be persuasive when making a finding of PA | 11:40am – 12:10pm