Recording the Police, Co-Workers, and Others: What attorneys need to know

Sophia Cope
Jeffrey D. Wohl
James Murray
Sophia Cope | Electronic Frontier Foundation
Jeffrey D. Wohl | Paul Hastings LLP
James Murray | Paul Hastings LLP

On-Demand: June 25, 2024

3 hour CLE

Tuition: $245.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I - The First Amendment Right to Record the Police – Sophia Cope

This presentation will provide an overview of the circuit decisions recognizing a First Amendment right to record the police and the doctrinal basis for these decisions. It will discuss the consensus rule amongst the circuits, as well as special circumstances such as audio recording and livestreaming. It will also discuss practical considerations when recording the police, including why citizen recording is critical for police accountability.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Legal Precedents and Circuit Decisions
  • Consensus Rule and Special Circumstances
  • Practical Considerations for Recording Police
  • Role of Citizen Recording in Police Accountability

Session II - Making a Record: Understanding surreptitious-recording laws – Jeffrey D. Wohl and James Murray

Your smart phone makes it easier than ever to record conversations surreptitiously. But when can you legally press the record button? This session will discuss the current landscape of surreptitious-recording laws, including examinations of recording interactions with law enforcement, recording in the workplace, the legal impacts of recording in public versus private settings, and a discussion of ethical considerations and best practices.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • First Amendment protections
  • One and two-party consent jurisdictions
  • Expectations of privacy, wiretapping, and workplace surveillance

Session III – Ethical Considerations and Best Practices - Jeffrey D. Wohl and James Murray

This session offers insights into recording conversations within legal contexts. It addresses ethical concerns surrounding recording practices and emphasizes the obligation to inform all parties involved. Participants will learn strategies for maintaining confidentiality and preserving attorney-client privilege. Practical guidance will be provided to help attorneys navigate recording-related challenges in their professional endeavors.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Ethical implications of recording conversations
  • Duty to inform parties about recording practices
  • Safeguarding confidentiality and attorney-client privilege
  • Practical guidance for attorneys navigating recording-related issues

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Sophia Cope_FedBarSophia Cope | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Sophia Cope is a Senior Staff Attorney on the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s civil liberties team, working on a variety of free speech and privacy issues. She has been a civil liberties attorney for two decades and has experience in both litigation and policy advocacy. She previously worked at the News Media Alliance, the Center for Democracy and Technology, and the First Amendment Project. She is a graduate of Santa Clara University and University of California College of the Law, San Francisco (UC Law SF, formerly UC Hastings).

 

Jeffrey D. Wohl_FedBarJeffrey D. Wohl | Paul Hastings LLP

Jeffrey Wohl is a partner in the Paul Hastings Employment Law Department in San Francisco. Over his four-decade career, Mr. Wohl has practiced every aspect of employment law, including litigation and client counseling in the areas of equal employment opportunity, harassment and retaliation, disability accommodation, wrongful termination, privacy, and wage-and-hour. Mr. Wohl is a frequent speaker on employment law topics and is a Fellow of the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers.

 

James Murray_FedBarJames Murray | Paul Hastings LLP

James Murray is an associate in the Paul Hastings Employment Law Department in Washington, D.C. Mr. Murray’s practice focuses on employment counseling and collective and class action litigation defense.

Before joining Paul Hastings, Mr. Murray served as the Vice Mayor of Ashland, Virginia, where he gained valuable, first-hand experience with organizational leadership, public relations, crisis planning and communications, and political lobbying.

Agenda

Session I – The First Amendment Right to Record the Police | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • Legal Precedents and Circuit Decisions | 1:00pm – 1:15pm
  • Consensus Rule and Special Circumstances | 1:15pm – 1:30pm
  • Practical Considerations for Recording Police | 1:30pm – 1:45pm
  • Role of Citizen Recording in Police Accountability | 1:45pm – 2:00pm

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Making a Record: Understanding surreptitious-recording laws | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Understanding Recording Laws | 2:10pm – 2:20pm
    • Definition of recording conversations
    • Federal and state laws governing recording practices
    • Distinction between one-party and two-party consent states
    • Discussion on wiretapping statutes and exceptions
  • Recording Interactions with Law Enforcement | 2:20pm – 2:35pm
    • Rights and limitations when recording encounters with police officers
    • Analysis of the First Amendment implications
    • Review of notable court cases shaping the legal landscape
    • Practical advice for individuals interacting with law enforcement
  • Recording in Public Spaces | 2:35pm –2:50pm
    • Understanding privacy expectations in public areas
    • Applicability of recording laws in public areas
    • Considerations for recording protests, demonstrations, and public gatherings
    • Balancing First Amendment rights with privacy concerns
  • Recording in Private Spaces | 2:50pm – 3:00pm
    • Understanding expectations of privacy in private residences, businesses, and others
    • Consent requirements for recording conversations in private spaces
    • Legal precedents regarding hidden cameras and audio recording devices
  • Recording in the Workplace | 3:00pm – 3:10pm
    • Legal framework for recording conversations in the workplace
    • Employee rights and employer obligations regarding workplace surveillance
    • Handling disputes arising from workplace recordings

Break | 3:10pm – 3:20pm

Session III – Ethical Considerations and Best Practices | 3:20pm – 4:20pm

    • Ethical implications of recording conversations
    • Duty to inform parties about recording practices
    • Safeguarding confidentiality and attorney-client privilege
    • Practical guidance for attorneys navigating recording-related issues

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Arkansas's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hour

Delaware

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Florida

Reciprocity
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Indiana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hour

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hour

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hour

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General, 1.2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Nevada

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General, 1.2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “A”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Oregon

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hour

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hour

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 Law and Legal, 1 Ethics

Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3.5 General

Ethics credits can ONLY be earned through Live-Webcast programs, the Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners does not approve Ethics through On-Demand sessions.
West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General, 1 Ethics

Wyoming

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition) Fri, April 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition)
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition) Fri, April 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives Fri, April 18, 2025
Live Webcast
Real Estate LLC Disputes
Real Estate LLC Disputes Wed, April 23, 2025
Live Webcast
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition)
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
Live Webcast
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition)
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Tue, April 29, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition)
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition) Wed, April 30, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay