Responsible AI for Lawyers: Ethical Limits, Judicial Scrutiny, and the Risks Attorneys Can’t Ignore (2026 Edition)

Jeffrey Cunningham
Jeffrey Cunningham
Cohen Vaughan

Jeff actively defends lawyers and acts as outside General Counsel to small and mid-sized law firms across the United States, while also serving as this firm’s General Counsel. Jeff defends industry professionals in a wide range of professional liability, ethics and professional disciplinary matters. With an emphasis on simple systems of risk management, Jeff brings a holistic approach of protecting our clients before problems occur.

Matthew H. Grady
Matthew H. Grady
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Matthew Grady brings significant industry experience in computer sciences to his practice. Clients both large and small turn to Matthew for tailored, strategic solutions that focus on valuable business goals and assets. He guides clients through the development of effective intellectual property-building strategies incorporating utility patents, design patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets.

Live Video-Broadcast: February 26, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – How Attorneys Are Using AI: Practical Tools, Ethical Guardrails, & Judicial Expectations – Jeffrey Cunningham

This session examines how lawyers are actually using AI in their day-to-day practice and where the ethical and professional risks commonly arise. From the perspective of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, we will explore practical use cases for AI in legal research, drafting, intake, and practice management, while distinguishing permissible assistance from impermissible delegation of professional judgment. The session will also address when AI use may require disclosure to clients, courts, or opposing counsel, how judges are responding to AI-assisted filings, and the emerging body of sanctions and standing orders governing AI use. Throughout, the focus will be on concrete risk-management strategies lawyers and law firms can implement now to use AI responsibly, competently, and in compliance with the rules of professional conduct and professional obligations.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Practical use by lawyers now
  • Ethics rules and risk management
  • Disclosure duties and transparency
  • Judicial treatment and danger

Session II – Generative AI and the Practice of Law: Practical Uses, Limits, and Strategic Adoption – Matthew H. Grady

This session provides a practical, experience-driven review of how generative artificial intelligence is being used by lawyers today and what attorneys should realistically expect from these tools in day-to-day practice. Rather than focusing on abstract theory, the program examines concrete legal workflows where GenAI can add value, as well as areas where its limitations create meaningful risk. Participants will gain a clear understanding of the current landscape of AI tools available to lawyers, how firms are piloting and implementing these technologies, and why human judgment remains essential. The session also addresses the competitive and client-expectation pressures driving AI adoption across the legal industry. By the end of the program, attorneys will be better equipped to evaluate GenAI tools, integrate them thoughtfully into their practice, and avoid common adoption mistakes that undermine accuracy and efficiency.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Review of generative AI and how lawyers are currently using it in legal research, drafting, summarization, and document review
  • Strengths and limitations of GenAI for law practice, including reliability concerns, hallucinations, and the need for human oversight
  • Categories of AI tools available to attorneys, including public vs. enterprise platforms and practice-focused legal AI solutions
  • Practical considerations for integrating GenAI into law firm workflows, training, and internal knowledge management
  • Common pitfalls and adoption challenges law firms encounter when deploying GenAI tools
  • Client expectations, competitive pressures, and the evolving role of lawyers in an AI-enabled legal marketplace

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: February 26, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Jeffrey Cunningham | Cohen Vaughan

Jeff actively defends lawyers and acts as outside General Counsel to small and mid-sized law firms across the United States, while also serving as this firm’s General Counsel. Jeff defends industry professionals in a wide range of professional liability, ethics and professional disciplinary matters. With an emphasis on simple systems of risk management, Jeff brings a holistic approach of protecting our clients before problems occur.

Jeff has an audience of over 30,000 followers on LinkedIn and other social media platforms. He produces a weekly newsletter on ethics and malpractice, a monthly law firm risk management newsletter and daily blog, Point One: A Bite of Ethics a Day Keeps Legal Malpractice Claims Away, as well as the world’s only ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct-based meme page, The Model-Rule-Meme-A-Day. A life-long learner and teacher, Jeff presents dozens of Continuing Legal Education courses per year on varying topics of law firm risk management and ethics.

A graduate of The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina, Jeff prepared for his legal practice serving as a Cadet Second Lieutenant/Platoon Leader, the First Battalion Honor Court Representative, and the Editor-in-Chief of The Brigadier newspaper.

Jeff is a Fulbright Scholar, and nurtured his love of travel and languages during his Fulbright fellowship in Germany. He also traveled extensively before and after school, relying on his fluency in German, Yiddish, and Hebrew and studying the law across Europe and in Israel.

At Fordham Law, Jeff was an Associate Editor of the Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law and earned the Archibald R. Murray Public Service Award magna cum laude for pro bono work. He also gained valuable early litigation experience as a legal intern with the Queens District Attorney’s Office and the US Attorney’s Office Southern District of New York Criminal Division.

Jeff has 15 years of large firm experience and defends professional liability cases on behalf of lawyers, law firms, and a myriad of other professionals. He also serves as outside General Counsel to numerous small and mid-sized law firms.

 

Matthew H. Grady | Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Matthew Grady brings significant industry experience in computer sciences to his practice. Clients both large and small turn to Matthew for tailored, strategic solutions that focus on valuable business goals and assets. He guides clients through the development of effective intellectual property-building strategies incorporating utility patents, design patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets.

Matthew works extensively in the US and foreign jurisdictions protecting innovation in the fields of artificial intelligence, encryption, authentication, database design, implementation, and optimization, as well as web-based services and augmentation (Web3.0). He has also developed IP strategies in cryptocurrency, blockchain technologies, medical imaging and devices, bioinformatics, communication systems, cloud computing, and application development and advises clients in quantum computing.

Matthew serves as the firm’s AI Task Force Lead, helping shape guidance and best practices around emerging AI technologies.

Matthew is a founding member of The Ordinary Observer® (for which he registered the trademark), a weekly blog dedicated to the interesting and evolving world of design patents.

Agenda

Session I – How Attorneys Are Using AI: Practical Tools, Ethical Guardrails, & Judicial Expectations | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • Practical use by lawyers now
  • Ethics rules and risk management
  • Disclosure duties and transparency
  • Judicial treatment and danger

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Generative AI and the Practice of Law: Practical Uses, Limits, and Strategic Adoption | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Review of generative AI and how lawyers are currently using it in legal research, drafting, summarization, and document review
  • Strengths and limitations of GenAI for law practice, including reliability concerns, hallucinations, and the need for human oversight
  • Categories of AI tools available to attorneys, including public vs. enterprise platforms and practice-focused legal AI solutions
  • Practical considerations for integrating GenAI into law firm workflows, training, and internal knowledge management
  • Common pitfalls and adoption challenges law firms encounter when deploying GenAI tools
  • Client expectations, competitive pressures, and the evolving role of lawyers in an AI-enabled legal marketplace

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1.2 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes, 60 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Dual

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours, 1 Ethics / Professionalism Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Mini-Med School for Lawyers (2026 Edition)
Mini-Med School for Lawyers (2026 Edition) Wed, February 4, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, February 18, 2026
Live Webcast
How to Launch a Token
How to Launch a Token Tue, March 3, 2026
Live Webcast