Crafting Effective IP Licensing Agreements: Key Insights from Licensor and Licensee Perspectives

Amy A. Abeloff
Sharre Lotfollahi
John Lynn
Lauren Schweitzer
Amy A. Abeloff | Kirkland & Ellis
Sharre Lotfollahi | Kirkland & Ellis
John Lynn | Kirkland & Ellis
Lauren Schweitzer | Kirkland & Ellis

Live Video-Broadcast: April 17, 2025

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

In this program, we will provide a detailed examination of intellectual property (IP) licensing agreements, catering to both foundational and advanced perspectives. We’ll begin by covering the essential elements of IP licensing agreements, highlighting the differences between patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret licenses. Key provisions will be discussed from both the licensor and licensee perspectives, with an emphasis on clarity and precision in drafting.

Building on these basics, we’ll delve into more complex provisions and special considerations, including the unique needs of licensors and licensees. We will explore common pitfalls to avoid, with a special focus on software licenses, cloud computing, and the nuances of tailoring agreements to specific types of IP rights. This comprehensive approach ensures participants gain both a solid understanding of the fundamentals and the ability to navigate advanced aspects of IP licensing agreements.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Patent vs. Trademark vs. Copyright vs. Trade Secret license agreements
  • The grant clause
  • Reservations and restrictions
  • Term and termination
  • Acknowledgment and maintenance of IP
  • Consideration and royalties
  • Confidentiality and infringement provisions
  • Indemnifications, representations, and warranties
  • Disputes, jurisdiction, and venue
  • Clauses specific to the type of IP rights license
  • Special issues with software licenses and cloud computing
  • Common drafting mistakes to avoid

Date / Time: April 17, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Amy Abeloff_FedBarAmy A. Abeloff | Kirkland & Ellis

Amy Abeloff is of counsel in Kirkland’s Los Angeles office. Amy counsels on intellectual property matters and has extensive experience in full-service global trademark portfolio management. Amy has extensive experience advising clients on the availability to use and register trademarks worldwide, preparing trademark filing strategies ranging from single trademarks to large, multijurisdictional projects, advocating for her clients offensively and defensively in pre-enforcement activity, and developing complex enforcement strategies incorporating online marketplace and social media takedowns as well as anti-counterfeiting activities. She also provides counsel to clients  regarding availability to use and register copyright protectable material.

Amy is active on multiple committees of the International Trademark Association. She also represents several small businesses and nonprofit organizations in various pro bono matters, including trademark and copyright advising and counseling, prosecution and enforcement strategy.

Amy has assisted multiple large-scale, international companies across the alcoholic beverage, healthcare, insurance, financial services and consumer goods industries with global trademark portfolio management matters, including prosecution, filing strategies, clearance, pre-enforcement, enforcement, domestic and international oppositions and cancellations, coexistence and settlement negotiations, license review and revisions, among other intellectual property matters.

 

speaker_Sharre LotfollahiSharre Lotfollahi | Kirkland & Ellis

Sharre Lotfollahi is a partner in Kirkland & Ellis’ Intellectual Property Litigation Group and focuses on disputes involving patent, trade secret, trademark, and copyright, including licensing disputes regarding intellectual property. She has represented clients in disputes involving various areas of technology, including semiconductor manufacturing, microprocessor design, athlete tracking, online ad creation and customer service software, medical devices and implants.

Sharre has been a member of 11 trial teams, including serving as a first chair on two trials. At trial, Sharre has conducted direct and cross examinations of fact and expert witnesses, including preparing witnesses on jury-related performance. She has argued numerous motions, including at trial, and managed numerous other trial activities. She successfully led a trial team on behalf of low-income tenants against slumlords in South Los Angeles.

Sharre also advises clients on matters before the Patent and Trademark Office, contractual and licensing issues, and commercial legal strategy.

 

speaker_John LynnJohn Lynn | Kirkland & Ellis

John Lynn co-leads Kirkland’s Technology & IP Transactions Practice and heads the practice on the West Coast out of the Bay Area office and in Texas out of the Austin office. John is on the forefront of understanding the complex relationships between intellectual property and technology, on the one hand, and business matters and risk, on the other hand.

John works on a wide variety of matters in which technology, data protection, and artificial intelligence play a key role, including private equity matters and other mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures (particularly in the software and high technology fields); financings, secured lending matters, liability management transactions; and bankruptcies and restructurings. In addition, John assists clients in connection with joint ventures and strategic alliances; intellectual property and technology transfers, licenses, and development agreements; royalty buy-outs; data transfer and license arrangements; and other commercial contracts (such as supply, distribution, and service agreements).

 

speaker_Lauren SchweitzerLauren Schweitzer | Kirkland & Ellis

Lauren Schweitzer is an intellectual property litigation partner in the Los Angeles office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Lauren concentrates her practice on copyright, trademark, internet, and advertising litigation.  Lauren has experience with various stages of litigation, including fact discovery, motion practice, trial, and appeal. She is also active in pro bono matters.

Won summary judgment for PepsiCo in trademark infringement suit brought by seller of ready-to-drink coffee Represented C&M Investment Group, Ltd. and Karlin Holdings, entities owned by Dr. Gary Michelson, in litigation stemming from interference with C&M’s efforts to collect on a $24 million judgment for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and civil racketeering. On May 17, 2019, following a week-long jury trial, Kirkland secured jury verdicts of roughly $2.5 million for the clients.

Agenda

I. Patent vs. Trademark vs. Copyright vs. Trade Secret license agreements | 1:00pm – 1:10 pm

  • Understanding the different types of IP rights and the unique considerations for each

II. The grant clause | 1:10pm – 1:20pm

  • Clearly define the scope of the license and the legal rights being transferred

III. Reservations and restrictions| 1:20pm – 1:30pm

  • Determining what rights are reserved and what limitations should be included in the agreement

IV. Term and termination | 1:30pm – 1:40pm

  • Setting clear terms of duration and termination clauses to protect both parties

V. Acknowledgment and maintenance of IP | 1:40pm – 1:50pm

  • Defining each party’s responsibilities related to IP maintenance, including upkeep of IP rights and registration

VI. Consideration and royalties | 1:50pm – 2:00pm

  • Structuring compensation terms, including upfront payments, royalties, and other forms of consideration

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

VII. Confidentiality and infringement provisions| 2:10pm – 2:20pm

  • Ensuring protection of sensitive information and addressing how infringement issues will be handled

VIII. Indemnifications, representations, and warranties | 2:20pm – 2:30pm

  • Key clauses for liability, ensuring that each party is protected from certain risks and responsibilities

IX. Disputes, jurisdiction, and venue | 2:30pm – 2:40pm

  • How to structure the dispute resolution process, including selecting jurisdiction and venue

X. Clauses specific to the type of IP rights license | 2:40pm – 2:50pm

  • Tailoring clauses based on the specific IP rights being licensed

XI. Special issues with software licenses and cloud computing | 2:50pm – 3:00pm

  • Addressing unique concerns with licensing software and cloud-based services

XII. Common drafting mistakes to avoid | 3:00pm – 3:10pm

  • Highlighting typical errors and oversights that can lead to costly issues for your clients

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win Wed, April 16, 2025
Live Webcast
The Convergence of the EU AI Act and ISO Requirements
The Convergence of the EU AI Act and ISO Requirements
Rachel V. Rose – Attorney at Law, PLLC
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition) Fri, April 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition)
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition) Fri, April 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Real Estate LLC Disputes
Real Estate LLC Disputes Wed, April 23, 2025
Live Webcast
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition)
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
Live Webcast
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition)
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay