Geospatial Technology and Spatial Thinking in IP and Trade Secret Litigation: Evidence, Analysis, and Risk

Paul Keller
Paul Keller
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP

Paul B. Keller is a partner at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, where he focuses on intellectual property litigation with an emphasis on trade secret disputes, complex technology matters, and cross-border enforcement.

Joseph Kerski
Joseph Kerski
Joseph Kerski, Ph.D. GISP

Joseph Kerski is a geographer with a focus on analyzing change over space and time across multiple fields of study. His research examines the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in education.

On-Demand: January 28, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – Geospatial Technology in IP and Trade Secret Litigation – Paul Keller

This session explores how location-based data, such as GPS records, mapping software, satellite imagery, and geofencing, has become increasingly relevant in intellectual property and trade secret disputes. This session will examine how geospatial evidence is created, preserved, and used in litigation, including its role in proving misappropriation, competitive conduct, access, and damages. Attendees will gain practical insights into evidentiary issues, discovery strategy, and risk management considerations when geospatial technology intersects with IP enforcement.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Use of geospatial data: GPS, mapping tools, satellite imagery, and geofencing in IP and trade secret litigation
  • Discovery, authentication, and admissibility issues: Considerations involving location-based evidence
  • Leveraging geospatial evidence: Establishing access, misappropriation, competitive activity, and damages
  • Risk mitigation and compliance considerations: Geospatial data collection and use

Session II – Spatial Thinking and Geospatial Data in Practice: Insights, Innovation, and Impact – Joseph Kerski

This session provides the geospatial and spatial-thinking foundation behind the location-based data increasingly used in high-stakes decision-making across industries. Focusing on geotechnologies such as GIS, GPS, remote sensing, and web mapping, the session explores how geospatial data are created, analyzed, validated, and communicated in real-world contexts. Participants will learn how spatial thinking reveals patterns, relationships, movement, and scale, and how these insights support operational, analytical, and strategic objectives. The session emphasizes data quality, ethical use, effective visualization, and interdisciplinary integration, equipping attendees with a deeper understanding of how geospatial technologies generate credible, actionable insights that later may appear in policy, regulatory, or legal settings.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What are the geospatial technologies?
  • Why do they matter to society?
  • What are the key forces and trends that have transformed and will continue to shape geospatial technologies in this decade?
  • What skills are needed for success in geospatial technologies and how can you gain these skills?

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Paul Keller | Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP

Paul B. Keller is a partner at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, where he focuses on intellectual property litigation with an emphasis on trade secret disputes, complex technology matters, and cross-border enforcement. He represents clients in federal and state courts across the United States in cases involving misappropriation, unfair competition, and emerging technology issues. Paul regularly advises companies on protecting proprietary information, managing litigation risk, and navigating disputes involving data-driven technologies. He is a frequent speaker on IP litigation trends and the intersection of technology and law.

 

Joseph Kerski | Joseph Kerski, Ph.D. GISP

Joseph Kerski is a geographer with a focus on analyzing change over space and time across multiple fields of study. His research examines the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in education. He has served as the president of the National Council for Geographic Education and has given two TED Talks on “The Whys of Where.” He holds three degrees in geography (BA, MA, PhD) and has worked as a geographer across five major sectors, including as an independent consultant; in government (NOAA, US Census Bureau, USGS); in academia (University of Minnesota, Harrisburg Area Community College, Penn State University, Sinte Gleska University, University of Denver, and others); in private industry (as Education Manager for Esri); and in nonprofit organizations (with roles in geography and education associations).

Joseph has authored over 100 chapters and articles and produced 200 podcasts on GIS, education, space, place, and related topics. He has visited more than 350 schools, and 400 universities worldwide and regularly conducts professional development for educators. He has created over 7,000 videos, 2,500 lessons, 1,500 blog essays, and authored 12 books, including Interpreting Our World, Spatial Thinking in Environmental Contexts, Essentials of the Environment, Spatial Mathematics, Tribal GIS, International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning, and The GIS Guide to Public Domain Data. As a lifelong learner, he continues to seek mentors, partners, and collaborators.

Agenda

Session I – Geospatial Technology in IP and Trade Secret Litigation | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • Use of geospatial data: GPS, mapping tools, satellite imagery, and geofencing in IP and trade secret litigation
  • Discovery, authentication, and admissibility issues: Considerations involving location-based evidence
  • Leveraging geospatial evidence: Establishing access, misappropriation, competitive activity, and damages
  • Risk mitigation and compliance considerations: Geospatial data collection and use

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Spatial Thinking and Geospatial Data in Practice: Insights, Innovation, and Impact | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • What are the geospatial technologies?
  • Why do they matter to society?
  • What are the key forces and trends that have transformed and will continue to shape geospatial technologies in this decade?
  • What skills are needed for success in geospatial technologies and how can you gain these skills?

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 General Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via Attorney Submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 General Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 General Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 General Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

The Federal Bar Association reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 General Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law and Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, February 18, 2026
Live Webcast
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Mon, February 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition)
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition) Wed, February 25, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86 Wed, February 25, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay