Modern Insurance Adjusting: Using and Countering AI-Powered Claim Valuation System

James Mathis
Kate Riordan
Marshall Gilinsky
James Mathis | Sequoia Visions, Inc
Kate Riordan | Verisk Analytics, Inc
Marshall Gilinsky | Anderson Kill P.C

Live Video-Broadcast: February 19, 2026

3 hour CLE

Tuition: $245.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I - Insurance Claims Practices and Procedures - James Mathis

This session examines modern insurance claims practices and procedures, focusing on how claims are evaluated, developed, and resolved. It covers the use of insurance software in claim evaluation, effective strategies for claim workup and drafting persuasive demand packages, and best practices for handling claims within 120 days up to policy limits. The session also highlights additional value drivers that can strengthen a claim and identifies common pitfalls to avoid in minor impact cases, including issues that may trigger Special Investigations Unit (SIU) scrutiny. Practitioners will gain practical tools to enhance claim outcomes and streamline the negotiation process.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Insurance software claim evaluation
  • Claim workup and demands
  • Claim handling 120 days to policy limits
  • Additional value drivers
  • Minor impacts and SIU issues to avoid

Session II - How AI Claim Valuation Engines Are Built, Trained & Governed - Kate Riordan

This session explains how insurers’ AI claim valuation engines are built, what data they rely on, and what their outputs actually mean in real claims practice. It covers confidence ranges, key severity drivers, and common failure modes such as bias, data gaps, and poor performance across jurisdictions or injury types. The session also addresses responsible AI governance, including audit trails, documentation, and compliance expectations. Attendees leave with a practical checklist of questions to ask carriers or vendors to assess reliability, oversight, and defensibility.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What data goes in/what outputs mean in practice
  • Confidence ranges, severity drivers, and common failure modes
  • Responsible-AI governance, audit trails, and compliance expectations
  • Practical “questions to ask the carrier/vendor” toolkit for adjusters and counsel

Session III - Intersection of Insurance and AI: An Eye on Claims Handling - Marshall Gilisky

This CLE session explores how insurers are using AI in claims handling and why carriers adopt these tools for faster processing, lower costs, and more consistent outcomes. It highlights the Colossus system as a cautionary example of how automated valuation tools can be calibrated in ways that suppress payouts and connects those risks to good-faith obligations and the duty to fairly handle claims and deliver the promise to pay. The session also summarizes key regulatory expectations reflected in the NAIC Model Bulletin, including concerns about inaccuracy, unfair discrimination, data vulnerability, and the need for transparency and explainability. It concludes with practical guidance on the governance controls and documentation adjusters and counsel should expect and request, including an AI systems program, validation and retesting practices, auditability, and monitoring for model drift.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • How AI is being used in insurance, especially claims, and why carriers adopt it such as speed, cost, consistency, and pricing accuracy
  • Colossus as the cautionary model for how valuation systems can be tuned to suppress payouts and what that implies for modern AI tools
  • When algorithmic reliance becomes a good-faith problem and the insurer obligation to fairly handle claims and deliver the promise to pay
  • Regulatory expectations from the NAIC Model Bulletin focusing on inaccuracy, unfair discrimination, data vulnerability, and transparency and explainability
  • Governance artifacts adjusters and counsel should expect and request including AIS program controls, documentation, validation and retesting, auditability, and monitoring for model drift

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: February 19, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 4:20 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 3:20 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 2:20 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 1:20 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

James Mathis | Sequoia Visions, Inc

James Mathis was employed with State Farm Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company in executive positions for many years. He was the named company executive on behalf of insurers in claims involving value, insurance fraud, insurance bad faith, insurance breach of contract and punitive damage litigation. He was responsible for implementing many of the claims practices and programs currently used by the insurance industry today. He is a nationally sought after speaker in the areas of claim handling, claim evaluation, claim litigation, insurance policies and Errors & Omission claims. He has testified in deposition, trial testimony and/or written professional opinions in more than 175 trials. He is often retained as a litigation consulate. He has spoken for Trial Lawyer Associations and Physician Associations in all states in the United States and in Canada.

 

Kate Riordan | Verisk Analytics, Inc

Kate Riordan is the vice-president of Analytics Initiatives and Compliance at Verisk. Kate began her career at Verisk as a Medicare Set Aside compliance attorney. In that role, she completed and obtained CMS approval of hundreds of Medicare Set Asides. She is fluent in Section 111 reporting requirements, the conditional payment recovery process, Medicare Advantage, Part D and Medicaid recovery. In addition to providing Medicare compliance Kate is oversaw the creation and go to market plan for Discovery Navigator, an AI powered tool that automatically enables identification and retrieval of key data points within large unstructured documents. In these roles she’s participated in numerous national presentations, client trainings and article writing.

Prior to joining Verisk, Kate worked in elder law and estate planning and brought significant experience in public policy and legislative initiatives to her role. Kate received her J.D. from Suffolk University Law School with a concentration in Health Care law and received her B.A. in Government Affairs and Legal Studies from Bowdoin College. Kate is Vice-President of the National Medicare Secondary Payer Network (MSP Network) and co-chairs the Policy & Legislative committee as well as a member of the Medicare Advocacy Recovery Coalition (MARC).

 

Marshall Gilinsky | Anderson Kill P.C

Marshall Gilinsky is a shareholder in Anderson Kill’s Boston office and practices in the firm’s Insurance Recovery and Commercial Litigation groups. Marshall is co-chair of the firm’s Sexual Harassment and Abuse Insurance Recovery Group and Sports, Media and Entertainment Group, and a member of the firm’s Banking and Lending Group and Restaurant, Retail & Hospitality Group.

During his nearly 30-year career representing policyholders, Marshall has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for his clients, successfully litigating disputed claims under a variety of insurance products, including property and business interruption insurance, commercial general liability (CGL) insurance, errors and omissions (E&O) insurance, directors and officers (D&O) insurance and life insurance. Marshall has represented clients on numerous high-stakes, complex insurance claims arising out of prominent losses such as 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, Superstorm Sandy and the “Big Dig” in Boston. He also focuses extensively on assisting clients that own and manage captive insurance companies, especially with respect to resolving coverage disputes between the captive and its reinsurers.

Marshall’s success in solving clients’ problems stems from his ability to understand their businesses, as well as their insurance programs in order to maximize the value of the clients’ insurance assets. He frequently writes and lectures on a variety of topics of interest to professionals and practitioners in the insurance arena, and is frequently quoted in the press, including appearance.

Agenda

Session I – Insurance Claims Practices and Procedures | 1:00pm – 3:10pm

  • Insurance software claim evaluation
  • Claim workup and demands
  • Claim handling 120 days to policy limits

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

  • Additional value drivers
  • Minor impacts and SIU issues to avoid

Break | 3:10pm – 3:20pm

Session II – How AI Claim Valuation Engines Are Built, Trained & Governed | 3:20pm – 3:50pm

  • What data goes in/what outputs mean in practice
  • Confidence ranges, severity drivers, and common failure modes
  • Responsible-AI governance, audit trails, and compliance expectations
  • Practical “questions to ask the carrier/vendor” toolkit for adjusters and counsel

Session III – Intersection of Insurance and AI: An Eye-on Claims Handling | 3:50pm – 4:20pm

  • How AI is being used in insurance, especially claims, and why carriers adopt it such as speed, cost, consistency, and pricing accuracy
  • Colossus as the cautionary model for how valuation systems can be tuned to suppress payouts and what that implies for modern AI tools
  • When algorithmic reliance becomes a good-faith problem and the insurer obligation to fairly handle claims and deliver the promise to pay
  • Regulatory expectations from the NAIC Model Bulletin focusing on inaccuracy, unfair discrimination, data vulnerability, and transparency and explainability
  • Governance artifacts adjusters and counsel should expect and request including AIS program controls, documentation, validation and retesting, auditability, and monitoring for model drift

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
3.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
3 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
180 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
3.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
3.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
3 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
3 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
3.6 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
3.6 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI-Powered Litigator: Real Tools, Real Cases, Real Results
The AI-Powered Litigator: Real Tools, Real Cases, Real Results Tue, December 30, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Video Game Law for the Non-Game Lawyer
Video Game Law for the Non-Game Lawyer Wed, January 7, 2026
Live Webcast
Wine, Spirits and Beer Law 101 (2026 Edition)
Wine, Spirits and Beer Law 101 (2026 Edition) Wed, January 21, 2026
Live Webcast