Piercing and Protecting the Corporate Veil and Alter Ego Liability (2024 Edition)

Nelson C. Bellido
Mishell B. Kneeland
Sandy L. Morris
James R. Mozingo
Nelson C. Bellido | ROIG Lawyers
Mishell B. Kneeland | Culhane Meadows Haughian & Walsh PLLC
Sandy L. Morris | Valentine Austriaco & Bueschel, P.C.
James R. Mozingo | Mozingo | Quarles, PLLC

On-Demand: February 20, 2024

2.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $245.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I - Mastering Corporate Veil Dynamics: Strategies, Governance, and Legal Precedents – Nelson Bellido, Mishell Kneeland, and Sandy Morris

This comprehensive exploration delves into the intricate process of piercing and protecting the corporate veil, utilizing both the Alter Ego Theory and Common Factors. Participants will gain insights into the best corporate governance practices essential for avoiding claims to "pierce the corporate veil." The session will also dissect pivotal legal cases, such as Mortimer v. McCool and Segal v. Forastero, offering a nuanced understanding of their impact on corporate law. Reviewing these cases and examining the Alter Ego Theory and Common Factors will equip legal professionals with the tools to navigate the complexities of corporate veil piercing and strategies to safeguard corporate integrity.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What is corporate veil protection?
  • The process of piercing & protecting the corporate veil – using the Alter Ego Theory & Common Factors
  • Best corporate governance practices to avoid a claim to "pierce the corporate veil"
  • Revisiting seminal case Mortimer v. McCool – the adoption of the enterprise theory and impact on other courts’ view of corporate veil piercing
  • Segal v. Forastero – how a trial court ruled in favor of a jilted seller and pierced the corporate veil, but the appellate court overturned the ruling
  • Lessons Learned - Other Key Cases that the Business Lawyer can learn from

Session II - Strategic Maneuvers: Navigating Corporate Veil Limits and Liabilities – James Mozingo

This comprehensive session provides a strategic examination of ways to limit corporate veil liability, offering practical insights into risk mitigation strategies. Participants will receive detailed guidance on piercing the corporate veil under the single business enterprise theory, unraveling the complexities surrounding this legal concept. Additionally, the session delves into the heightened potential liability for related businesses, shedding light on the nuanced interplay of corporate structures. Further, it explores the expanded circumstances under which the court may choose to disregard the corporate form, providing a comprehensive understanding of the evolving legal landscape. This session is essential for legal professionals seeking a nuanced grasp of corporate liability management and the intricate factors influencing judicial decisions in this realm.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Ways to limit corporate veil liability
  • Detailed guidance on piercing the corporate veil under the single business enterprise theory
  • The increased potential liability for related businesses
  • The expanded circumstances under which the court may disregard the corporate form

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Nelson C. Bellido_FedBarNelson C. Bellido | ROIG Lawyers

Nelson Bellido is the managing partner of the Miami office of Roig Lawyers – a Florida statewide law firm with offices in Jacksonville, Orlando, Tampa, Deerfield Beach, West Palm Beach, and Miami. He chairs the Business Litigation Practice Group. Nelson is an accomplished first-chair trial lawyer with 31 years of experience in state, federal and arbitration tribunals.

His main areas of practice are in complex commercial litigation, products liability, insurance defense, finance law, and premises liability defense. Nelson represents clients on a local, state, national and international scale in a range of individual and corporate disputes, including defending and prosecuting disputes related to fraud, RICO, TCPA, ADA, warranty claims, unfair and deceptive trade practices, and trade secret matters.

He often lectures on a variety of legal topics, including litigation techniques and serves annually as a visiting lecturer at Duke University Law School. Nelson can be reached at [email protected].

 

Mishell B. Kneeland_FedBarMishell B. Kneeland | Culhane Meadows Haughian & Walsh PLLC

Mishell Kneeland is a commercial and employment litigator with more than two decades of experience representing clients in state and federal courts across the country. She has tried dozens of cases to verdict and has successfully obtained judgment for her clients on motions to dismiss and for summary judgment.

One of Mishell’s key skills is conducting early assessment to evaluate risk and determine whether her client’s goals are best served by crafting a solution outside of the courtroom or taking a case to trial. In addition to working in private practice, Mishell has served as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Texas and an Assistant City Attorney for the City of Austin.

Mishell frequently serves as a faculty member for the National Institute of Trial Advocacy’s Trial Skills and Deposition Skills courses, served as an Adjunct Professor of Trial Simulation at Texas Southern University’s Thurgood Marshall School of Law, and is very active in the National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms.

 

Sandy L. Morris_FedBar

Sandy L. Morris | Valentine Austriaco & Bueschel, P.C.

A partner in the certified women-owned Chicago firm of Valentine Austriaco & Bueschel, P.C., Sandy litigates complex business disputes and represents employers in cases involving restrictive covenants and alleged discrimination and retaliation. In addition to her active litigation practice, she assists employers with workplace investigations into discrimination and harassment complaints and potential violations of other corporate policies. She also regularly provides real-time employment counseling, assisting with implementation of best practices in hiring, discipline, and termination decisions and crafting effective and compliant employment policies. Sandy is a member of the Northern District of Illinois Trial Bar.

 

James R. Mozingo_FedBarJames R. Mozingo | Mozingo | Quarles, PLLC

James R. Mozingo is the managing member of MOZINGO|QUARLES, PLLC, headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi, where he has practiced for over 40 years. Jim is an AV, peer rated, lawyer in the Martindale-Hubbell listings and for a number of years has been found in the listings of Mid-South Super Lawyers.

A Fellow of the Mississippi Bar Foundation, in 2011 the Mississippi Business Journal named Jim as one of Mississippi’s 50 Leading Attorneys. A 1975 graduate of Washington & Lee University, he received his Juris Doctor “with distinction” from Mississippi College School of Law in 1978, serving as Associate Editor of the Mississippi College Law Review. Mozingo is a former member and of the Mississippi Board of Bar Admissions, examining in the fields of business organizations and bankruptcy, also serving on various committees with the National Conference of Bar Examiners.

Jim focuses his practice on business and commercial transactions and in the areas of business and commercial litigation, bankruptcy and debtor/creditor relations. Jim has handled a wide variety of transactions throughout the South and in various other parts of the country, as well as in Canada, Italy and Spain and with companies in the Far East. He has appeared in state and Federal courts throughout Mississippi and in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Tennessee and Texas, as well as handling significant commercial arbitration proceedings in St. Louis, Atlanta, Nashville and Knoxville.

Agenda

Session I – Mastering Corporate Veil Dynamics: Strategies, Governance, and Legal Precedents | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

  • What is corporate veil protection? | 12:00pm – 12:10pm
  • The process of piercing & protecting the corporate veil – using the Alter Ego Theory & Common Factors | 12:10pm – 12:20pm
  • Best corporate governance practices to avoid a claim to “pierce the corporate veil” | 12:20pm – 12:30pm
  • Revisiting seminal case Mortimer v. McCool -the adoption of the enterprise theory and impact on other courts’ view of corporate veil piercing | 12:30pm – 12:40pm
  • Segal v. Forastero – how a trial court ruled in favor of a jilted seller and pierced the corporate veil, but the appellate court overturned the ruling | 12:40pm – 12:50pm
  • Lessons Learned – Other Key Cases that the Business Lawyer can learn from | 12:50pm – 1:00pm

Break | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

Session II – Strategic Maneuvers: Navigating Corporate Veil Limits and Liabilities | 1:10pm -2:50pm

  • Ways to limit corporate veil liability | 1:10pm – 1:40pm
  • Detailed guidance on piercing the corporate veil under the single business enterprise theory | 1:40pm – 2:10pm

Break | 2:10pm – 2:20pm

  • The increased potential liability for related businesses | 2:20pm – 2:35pm
  • The expanded circumstances under which the court may disregard the corporate form | 2:35pm – 2:50pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Arkansas's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Colorado

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2.5 General hours

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Florida

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Certification Credits Approved:
3 Business Litigation

To request these credits, attorneys must contact us to issue a manual certificate.
Phone: (877) 406-8636
Email: [email protected]
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Iowa

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Indiana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Kansas

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Louisiana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2.5 General hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2.5 General hours

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2.5 General hours

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Montana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General hours

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “A”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2.5 General hours

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Texas

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2.5 General hours Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Washington

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 Law and Legal

For CLE course attendance credit, Washington state attorneys must self-apply to the Washington State Bar. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with the self-application package and instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

West Virginia

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Wyoming

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate Wed, April 2, 2025
Live Webcast
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition)
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition) Thu, April 3, 2025
Live Webcast
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition)
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition) Thu, April 10, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific)
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific) Fri, April 11, 2025
Live Webcast
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win Wed, April 16, 2025
Live Webcast
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives Fri, April 18, 2025
Live Webcast
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition)
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
Live Webcast