What Qualifies as Legal Hemp Under the New Federal Rules: Business, Compliance, and Litigation Risks

Shawn Hauser
Shawn Hauser
Vicente LLP

Shawn Hauser is a partner at Vicente LLP, where she co-chairs the firm's Hemp and Cannabinoids Department and Federal and International Law Group. She helps cannabis, hemp, and psychedelics businesses navigate the intersections between state and federal law and ensure compliance as laws evolve. Her practice focuses on regulatory compliance, licensing, general business representation, policy reform and strategic guidance to best position businesses for success at the state, national, and international levels.

Todd A. Harrison
Todd A. Harrison
Venable LLP

Todd A. Harrison is a partner in Venable LLP’s Food and Drug Law Group who counsels companies on the regulation, labeling, marketing, and risk profile of consumer products, especially foods, beverages, dietary supplements, and emerging botanical/cannabinoid products. He is widely recognized for guiding hemp and CBD stakeholders through the evolving federal framework, including the 2018 Farm Bill hemp definition, FDA jurisdiction over ingestible cannabinoids, and the compliance and enforcement risks that arise when products drift into Controlled Substances Act territory.

Live Video-Broadcast: January 16, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – The Farm Bill Framework and the Updated Federal Overhaul of “Hemp” – Shawn Hauser

This session re-establishes the legal baseline under the 2018 Farm Bill and analyzes the recent federal amendment that fundamentally reshapes what qualifies as lawful hemp. Attendees will gain a clear understanding of how the prior definition operated, how derivative and intoxicating hemp products exploited the statutory structure, and how Congress has now closed that pathway.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The 2018 Farm Bill’s legalization model and statutory definition of hemp
  • The role of delta-9 THC dry-weight testing and its compliance implications
  • How the “intoxicating hemp loophole” developed in the market
  • The new federal funding bill: Scope and purpose of the amendment
  • Transition from delta-9-only analysis to a “total THC” federal standard
  • Inclusion of THCA and other tetrahydrocannabinols in the hemp calculation
  • New finished-product THC cap and its legal effect on consumer products
  • Exclusion of synthetically derived/converted cannabinoids from hemp status
  • Effective date and the 12-month federal compliance runway

Session II – Business, Compliance, and Litigation Consequences for Hemp and Derivative Products – Todd A. Harrison

This session focuses on client counseling and risk management in light of the new federal standard. Attendees will examine how the revised definition impacts current business models, product lines, retail distribution, and enforcement exposure. The discussion will emphasize compliance pathways, contract and supply-chain considerations, and where civil or regulatory liability is most likely to arise.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Product categories likely to lose hemp status under the new definition
  • Controlled Substances Act implications once products fall outside “hemp”
  • Compliance strategies for manufacturers during the transition period
  • Exposure for retailers and distributors
  • Anticipated agency guidance and unresolved interpretive issues
  • Near-term enforcement, litigation, and transactional issues to watch

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: January 16, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Shawn Hauser | Vicente LLP

Shawn Hauser is a partner at Vicente LLP, where she co-chairs the firm’s Hemp and Cannabinoids Department and Federal and International Law Group. She helps cannabis, hemp, and psychedelics businesses navigate the intersections between state and federal law and ensure compliance as laws evolve. Her practice focuses on regulatory compliance, licensing, general business representation, policy reform and strategic guidance to best position businesses for success at the state, national, and international levels.

With more than a decade of experience in cannabis law and policy, Shawn is a go-to source for businesses, industry groups, governments, and reporters seeking opinions, analysis, and guidance. She has presented on cannabis law and policy to many local, federal, and international agencies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and UK Parliament.

Since directing Sensible Colorado’s local government implementation team following the passage of Amendment 64, Shawn remains active in policy work with local and state governments in Colorado and Texas as well as advocating for federal reforms. She is passionate in supporting the development and implementation of cannabis, hemp, and psychedelics regulations that advance the industries responsibly and in support of public health. Active in the community, Shawn currently serves on the Board of Directors of United States Cannabis Council, and previously served on boards of the International Cannabis Bar Association and on the steering committee of the American Hemp Campaign—a project of Vote Hemp—which was instrumental in legalizing hemp in Texas in 2019.

Well-regarded in her field, Shawn has received many accolades. She was named one of the top cannabis lawyers in the United States Chambers and Partners and was recognized by her peers in The Best Lawyers in America® for her work in cannabis law. Additionally, Shawn has been listed in 5280 magazine’s “Denver’s Top Lawyers” list since 2015 and was included in Denver Business Journal’s “40 Under 40” in 2021.

 

Todd A. Harrison | Venable LLP

Todd A. Harrison is a partner in Venable LLP’s Food and Drug Law Group who counsels companies on the regulation, labeling, marketing, and risk profile of consumer products, especially foods, beverages, dietary supplements, and emerging botanical/cannabinoid products. He is widely recognized for guiding hemp and CBD stakeholders through the evolving federal framework, including the 2018 Farm Bill hemp definition, FDA jurisdiction over ingestible cannabinoids, and the compliance and enforcement risks that arise when products drift into Controlled Substances Act territory.

Todd has been at the center of the national hemp conversation for years. When the 2018 Farm Bill removed hemp from Schedule I, he was quoted in industry coverage emphasizing that the legislation preserved FDA authority over foods and supplements containing CBD and forecasting the need for robust THC testing and compliant destruction protocols for “hot” extracts. Most recently, he co-authored Venable’s November 2025 analysis of Congress’s new federal funding bill amendment redefining hemp around a “total THC” standard, expressly counting THCA and other tetrahydrocannabinols, imposing a 0.4 mg per-container finished-product cap, and excluding chemically converted/synthetic cannabinoids, exactly the regulatory pivot at the core of this program.

In addition to cannabinoid work, Todd regularly defends and advises clients facing FDA and FTC scrutiny over safety, labeling, structure/function claims, and advertising, and he is a frequent speaker on high-stakes regulatory developments affecting the supplement and novel-ingredient marketplace. His practice experience makes him especially well-suited to address the webinar’s practical questions: which hemp-derived products will lose lawful status under the new definition, how manufacturers and retailers should manage the one-year compliance runway, and where enforcement and private litigation exposure is most likely to surface as federal and state rules diverge.

Agenda

Session I – The Farm Bill Framework and the Updated Federal Overhaul of “Hemp” | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • The 2018 Farm Bill’s legalization model and statutory definition of hemp
  • The role of delta-9 THC dry-weight testing and its compliance implications
  • How the “intoxicating hemp loophole” developed in the market
  • The new federal funding bill: Scope and purpose of the amendment
  • Transition from delta-9-only analysis to a “total THC” federal standard
  • Inclusion of THCA and other tetrahydrocannabinols in the hemp calculation
  • New finished-product THC cap and its legal effect on consumer products
  • Exclusion of synthetically derived/converted cannabinoids from hemp status
  • Effective date and the 12-month federal compliance runway

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Business, Compliance, and Litigation Consequences for Hemp and Derivative Products | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Product categories likely to lose hemp status under the new definition
    • Intoxicating hemp derivatives (e.g., delta-8/delta 10/HHC-type products)
    • High-THC hemp beverages and edibles
    • Full-spectrum CBD products exceeding the federal cap
  • Controlled Substances Act implications once products fall outside “hemp”
  • Compliance strategies for manufacturers during the transition period
    • Reformulation and testing protocols
    • Labeling, COA documentation, and audit preparedness
    • Vendor representations, warranties, and allocation of risk
  • Exposure for retailers and distributors
    • Inventory wind-down and recall preparation
    • Federal vs. state law divergence and multi-jurisdictional risk
  • Anticipated agency guidance and unresolved interpretive issues
  • Near-term enforcement, litigation, and transactional issues to watch

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Law & Legal

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition)
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition) Wed, January 14, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Diagnosing and Proving Traumatic Brain Injuries and PTSD
Diagnosing and Proving Traumatic Brain Injuries and PTSD Wed, January 14, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Wine, Spirits and Beer Law 101 (2026 Edition)
Wine, Spirits and Beer Law 101 (2026 Edition) Wed, January 21, 2026
Live Webcast
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Tue, January 27, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
AI Disclosures: Wording, Liability & Litigation Risks
AI Disclosures: Wording, Liability & Litigation Risks Thu, January 29, 2026
Live Webcast
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, January 29, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay