False Advertising Litigation: Affirmative Challenges, Defense Strategies, and Risk Mitigation

Andrew Lustigman
Andrew Lustigman
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP

Andrew Lustigman offers comprehensive counsel to domestic and international clients on advertising, marketing and promotions matters and represents them in regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, and litigation. He chairs Olshan’s Advertising, Marketing & Promotions Group and co-chairs its Brand Management & Protection Group.

Barry Benjamin
Barry Benjamin
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

Barry M. Benjamin chairs Kilpatrick’s Advertising and Marketing group and is the managing partner of the firm’s New York office. His practice focuses on advertising, technology, and privacy, advising clients small and large, from multinational corporations to start-up ventures, across numerous industries including retail, fashion, gaming, telecommunications, cosmetics, food and beverage, consumer products, and technology.

On-Demand: January 14, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Unlock the strategies and insights you need to excel in today’s fast-evolving marketplace with our dynamic two-hour continuing legal education program on false advertising litigation. Designed for legal professionals seeking to stay ahead of the curve, this essential session dives deep into the latest trends and case law shaping false advertising disputes, including the interplay between federal and state regulations, Lanham Act claims, substantiation requirements, comparative advertising, and enforcement priorities by the FTC and NAD. Our expert presenters will guide you through practical approaches to pre-litigation counseling, effective motion practice, class action risks, and the nuances of evidentiary challenges, all illustrated by real-world scenarios and recent verdicts. Whether you represent brands, agencies, or consumers, you’ll leave armed with actionable tools to advise clients, mitigate liability, and achieve favorable outcomes in this complex and high-stakes area of law. Don’t miss your chance to elevate your practice and connect with peers at the forefront of false advertising litigation.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Plaintiff side pre-litigation strategies and alternatives to consider
  • Plaintiff considerations in choice of forum, developing the complaint and satisfying the varying burdens of proof
  • Plaintiff analysis of whether a survey is necessary
  • Defendant side substantiation considerations, including pre-campaign and internal game-planning, puffery v. claims substantiation
  • Defendant response strategies, including involving experts
  • Defendant evaluation of forums and burdens of proof: NAD versus Federal Court versus regulatory complaint, as well as the impact of an adverse decision and remedies

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Andrew Lustigman | Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP

Andrew Lustigman offers comprehensive counsel to domestic and international clients on advertising, marketing and promotions matters and represents them in regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, and litigation. He chairs Olshan’s Advertising, Marketing & Promotions Group and co-chairs its Brand Management & Protection Group.

Marketers, advertisers, agencies and suppliers, among others, regularly seek Andy’s counsel regarding legal aspects of their advertising and promotional marketing businesses. He’s pragmatic and always looks for solutions that meet each client’s specific needs.

Andy advises them on the clearance of advertising, promotions, and marketing materials, and structures some of the most creative sweepstakes, games of skill, fundraising promotions, and other contests, development of social media programs, and direct marketing campaigns from both legal and compliance standpoints. He also conducts advertising and marketing due diligence in the context of mergers, acquisitions and investments. He is frequently called upon to help clients navigate the nation’s complex subscription marketing laws.

Andy advises clients across all media channels—social media, Internet, television, print, radio, direct mail, mobile, telemarketing, and other electronic media. He has significant experience with FTC and FDA regulatory requirements regarding health claims, advertising, labeling and distributing health-related products including OTC products, dietary supplements, medical devices, cosmetics, and medical foods. Clients also rely on Andy’s pragmatic approach in representing them in investigations, enforcement actions, and litigation brought by those agencies, the United States Department of Justice, the FCC, the U.S. Postal Service, state attorneys general, district attorneys, and other governmental authorities. Andy’s experience also extends to single-plaintiff, multiparty and class action cases and related commercial litigation alleging false and deceptive advertising, intellectual property-related claims, and corporate disputes, as well as a wide array of competitor advertising, IP and privacy challenges.

Proactive and strategic, Andy takes on emerging threats and conceives creative and aggressive defense theories to protect his client’s interests both in and out of court, including in alternative dispute venues. In prosecuting and defending his clients’ cases, he frequently appears in federal and state court and before the National Advertising Division of the Better Business Bureau.

Repeatedly recognized as a leader in his field and as an authority on advertising and promotional marketing law, Andy regularly appears on television, radio, and in publications such as The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, The National Law Journal, New York Law Journal, Inside Counsel, Bloomberg BNA, Law360, Mobile Marketer, and Luxury Daily, discussing important new cases and trends that advertisers and marketers need to know about. He has testified as an expert witness on advertising compliance in federal court.

A growing area of work Andy handles includes advising on and structuring a broad range of international business transactions. He also is retained by Am Law 100 and other leading firms as special counsel on advertising compliance matters in connection with their clients’ business investments.

In addition to maintaining his active practice, Andy is a co-managing partner of the firm and a member of its Executive Committee. He frequently speaks on advertising and promotional marketing law topics throughout the country and has been the publisher of Olshan’s Advertising Law Blog since its inception in the early 2000s.

 

Barry Benjamin | Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

Barry M. Benjamin chairs Kilpatrick’s Advertising and Marketing group and is the managing partner of the firm’s New York office. His practice focuses on advertising, technology, and privacy, advising clients small and large, from multinational corporations to start-up ventures, across numerous industries including retail, fashion, gaming, telecommunications, cosmetics, food and beverage, consumer products, and technology. He regularly drafts and negotiates advertising, technology, and commercial contracts, assists clients with advertising review, social media engagement, and promotions marketing, represents companies in court, in competitor challenges and investigations through the self-regulatory advertising industry process (NAD, CARU), and in governmental and regulatory (FTC, State AG) inquiries and investigations.

Agenda

I. Plaintiff side pre-litigation strategies and alternatives to consider | 1:00pm – 1:20pm

II. Plaintiff considerations in choice of forum, developing the complaint and satisfying the varying burdens of proof | 1:20pm – 1:40pm

III. Plaintiff analysis of whether a survey is necessary | 1:40pm – 2:00pm

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

IV. Defendant side substantiation considerations, including pre-campaign and internal game-planning, puffery v. claims substantiation | 2:10pm – 2:30pm

V. Defendant response strategies, including involving experts | 2:30pm – 2:50pm

VI. Defendant evaluation of forums and burdens of proof: NAD versus Federal Court versus regulatory complaint, as well as the impact of an adverse decision and remedies | 2:50pm – 3:10pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, February 18, 2026
Live Webcast
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Mon, February 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition)
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition) Wed, February 25, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86 Wed, February 25, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay