Crafting 24-3p into a Useful Tool for Representatives to Fight Against Job Numbers (Presented by the National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives)

Adam Sundling
Adam Sundling | Walker Firm, PC

Adam Sundling, based out of the Twin Cities Metro, has been practicing Social Security Disability for over 3 years. Over his time in the field, he has handled cases from all 50 states including some principalities and territories, such as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. His passion for providing the best possible chances of success for those that file for disability benefits leads him to push the field of Social Security Disability to empower other advocates

On-Demand: August 26, 2025

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
All-Access Pass

Free access to all CLE programs w/active subscription. Annual subscription only $395/yr.

Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

With the inclusion of SSR 24-3p, representatives have been given an additional burden to check the power of vocational experts. While this may seem like more work, in reality this creates a higher ceiling for success if the work is put into the process. In this specific instance, there are vocational experts within the Social Security Administration that utilize only SOC codes for providing significant numbers in the national economy and disguise this practice by hiding behind representative DOT occupations from the ONET crosswalk. Not only is this process duplicitous, it violates administration policy when looked through a closer lens. With this presentation, representatives will be able to identify vocational experts who are inflating their numbers through the use of SOC codes instead of relying upon data for each individual DOT occupation and eliminate problematic vocational experts that contribute to wrongful denials of benefits.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • SSR 24-3p actually empowers representatives to fight against VEs by allowing additional insight into their methods
  • There is a trend of experienced and inexperienced VEs, and SSR 24-3p makes it easier to identify which is which
  • SOC codes cannot be used to identify "other jobs" according to regulations
  • Catching and removing the inexperienced VEs to preserve the case

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Adam Sundling | Walker Firm, PC

Adam Sundling, based out of the Twin Cities Metro, has been practicing Social Security Disability for over 3 years. Over his time in the field, he has handled cases from all 50 states including some principalities and territories, such as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. His passion for providing the best possible chances of success for those that file for disability benefits leads him to push the field of Social Security Disability to empower other advocates to be the best representatives that they could possibly be. Adam now is with Walker Firm, PC out of California and still providing his best advocacy while continuing to develop creative methods for pushing back against the seemingly indestructible and never-ending walls that prevent claimants from receiving Social Security Disability benefits.

Agenda

I. SSR 24-3p actually empowers representatives to fight against VEs by allowing additional insight into their methods | 3:00pm – 3:15pm

II. There is a trend of experienced and inexperienced VEs, and SSR 24-3p makes it easier to identify which is which | 3:15pm – 3:30pm

III. SOC codes cannot be used to identify “other jobs” according to regulations | 3:30pm – 3:45pm

IV. Catching and removing the inexperienced VEs to preserve the case | 3:45pm – 4:00pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Settling Employment Claims: Keeping More
Settling Employment Claims: Keeping More Fri, November 7, 2025
Live Webcast
Ethical Duties When Representing an Organization
Ethical Duties When Representing an Organization Thu, November 13, 2025
Live Webcast
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts Thu, November 13, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Diagnosing and Proving Traumatic Brain Injuries and PTSD
Diagnosing and Proving Traumatic Brain Injuries and PTSD Tue, November 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Thu, November 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay