Data Center Brownfields: Acquiring Contaminated Sites Without Inheriting the Liability

Lawrence P. Schnapf
Lawrence P. Schnapf
Schnapf LLC

Lawrence P. Schnapf is the principal of Schnapf LLC and an environmental attorney with more than 40 years of experience handling environmental issues in real estate, corporate, brownfield, financing, and redevelopment transactions.

Matthew J. Sinkman
Matthew J. Sinkman
FBT Gibbons LLP

Matthew J. Sinkman represents buyers, sellers, and developers of contaminated properties as well as plaintiffs and defendants in hazardous-site disputes, giving him experience with both the transactional and litigation consequences of environmental liabilities.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 23, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Discount on a Contaminated Site Is the Cleanup You Inherit

Data center development is pushing buyers toward properties that require more than a conventional real estate diligence review. Before a client acquires a contaminated or potentially contaminated site, counsel needs to understand which environmental assessment standard applies, what facts support CERCLA liability protection, and how state cleanup programs fit into the transaction.

This program takes a practical look at the federal and state frameworks that govern these acquisitions. You will learn how to evaluate whether a Phase I satisfies All Appropriate Inquiries under ASTM E1527-21 and how ASTM E2247-23 differs for rural properties, assess the requirements for maintaining Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser status, and evaluate how the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances affects site risk. You will also examine state brownfield and voluntary cleanup programs, including enrollment requirements, financial incentives, cleanup agreements, institutional controls, and regulatory closure.

The program concludes with a practical framework for sequencing environmental diligence, state program participation, cleanup agreements, and closure documents against acquisition and development milestones.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Environmental Due Diligence and AAI
    How to structure a Phase I ESA under ASTM E1527-21, how ASTM E2247-23 differs for rural properties, and what counsel should confirm before relying on the assessment for CERCLA liability protection.
  • CERCLA Liability Protections and BFPP Status
    The Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser framework, the requirements for qualifying before acquisition, and the continuing obligations counsel must address after closing.
  • PFAS and Acquisition Risk
    How the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances affects environmental diligence, potential liability exposure, and the evaluation of contaminated data center sites.
  • Brownfield vs. Greenfield Development
    Potential benefits and tradeoffs of siting data centers on brownfield properties instead of greenfield sites, including how existing site conditions can affect project planning.
  • State Brownfield Program Architecture
    How state brownfield and voluntary cleanup programs provide liability protections, tax credits, grants, and other incentives, and what counsel needs to evaluate before enrolling a site.
  • Institutional Controls and Development Compatibility
    How Activity and Use Limitations, institutional controls, and other regulatory requirements can affect the proposed construction and long-term operation of a data center.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 23, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Lawrence P. Schnapf, Principal | Schnapf LLC

Lawrence P. Schnapf is the principal of Schnapf LLC and an environmental attorney with more than 40 years of experience handling environmental issues in real estate, corporate, brownfield, financing, and redevelopment transactions. His geology training gives him a technical perspective on contaminated sites, which complements his legal practice in environmental due diligence, liability, and brownfield redevelopment. He also represents clients in environmental litigation, enforcement, and cost-recovery matters.

  • Education & Credentials

Larry has legal and geology training and serves as an adjunct professor of environmental law at New York Law School, where he teaches Environmental Law and Policy and Brownfield Redevelopment. He has also taught environmental courses through the Center for Christian Studies at Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Larry has been recognized by New York Super Lawyers, The International Who’s Who of Environmental Lawyers, and Chambers USA, and holds an AV® Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell. He is a past Chair of the Environmental Law Section of the New York State Bar Association and the ABA Business Law Section Committee on Environmental, Energy and Natural Resources Law, and a Vice Chair of the ABA Section of Environment, Energy and Resources.

  • Professional Involvement

Larry co-chairs the NYSBA Brownfield Task Force and has held leadership roles in hazardous-site remediation. He chaired the legal subcommittee of the ASTM E1527 task force responsible for the 2013 and 2021 revisions to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment standard and co-chaired the legal subcommittee of the ASTM Vapor Intrusion Task Group. He is also an emeritus board member of the New York Brownfield Partnership and the Brownfield Coalition of the Northeast and has authored and edited leading environmental law publications.

  • Experience

Larry focuses on environmental risk in corporate, real estate, and brownfield transactions, including contaminated-site acquisition, redevelopment, financing, and disposition. His practice also covers distressed debt, bankruptcy, workouts, environmental litigation, enforcement, administrative proceedings, and private cost-recovery actions. His combination of transactional and technical experience makes him particularly well suited to addressing how attorneys can identify, evaluate, and manage environmental liabilities before acquiring contaminated properties.

 

Matthew J. Sinkman, Partner | FBT Gibbons LLP

Matthew J. Sinkman is a partner at FBT Gibbons LLP whose environmental practice focuses on contaminated-property transactions, Superfund litigation, site remediation, and environmental enforcement. He represents buyers, sellers, and developers of contaminated properties as well as plaintiffs and defendants in hazardous-site disputes, giving him experience with both the transactional and litigation consequences of environmental liabilities.

  • Education & Credentials

Matthew earned his J.D. from Boston University School of Law and his B.A. from the University of Michigan. He is licensed in New York and New Jersey and admitted to practice before the federal district courts throughout New York and in the District of New Jersey.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Matthew was recognized by Best Lawyers in its 2026 editions for Environmental Law and Litigation – Environmental and previously named to the New York Metro Super Lawyers Rising Stars list for Business Litigation. He has served on the NYSBA Environmental & Energy Law Section’s Executive Committee since 2019 and has co-chaired its Enforcement and Compliance Committee.

  • Professional Involvement

Matthew is a member of the NYSBA Environmental & Energy Law Section’s Global Climate Change and Hazardous Waste/Site Remediation Committees and serves on the Board of Directors of the New York City Brownfield Partnership. He regularly speaks on Superfund, brownfield, cleanup, and environmental enforcement issues and has written on PFAS regulation, New York Superfund amendments, and NYSDEC brownfield and Superfund regulations.

  • Experience

Matthew is a former Assistant Attorney General in the Environmental Protection Bureau of the New York State Attorney General’s Office, where he handled Superfund and environmental enforcement matters, including litigation involving more than $50 million in claims for PFAS contamination at 69 sites. In private practice, he represents parties in Superfund litigation and advises buyers, sellers, and developers on contaminated properties and New York’s Brownfield Cleanup Program, bringing both government-enforcement and transactional perspectives to environmental risk.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Environmental Diligence and CERCLA Defenses for Data Center Site Acquisitions | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session examines the environmental due diligence framework and CERCLA liability defenses available to attorneys representing data center developers acquiring contaminated brownfield sites. Attendees will learn how to structure a Phase I ESA that satisfies All Appropriate Inquiries under ASTM E1527-21 or ASTM E2247 to satisfy one the CERCLA liability protections, how ASTM E2247 differs when the target site is rural or a large tract, and how to maintain post-closing appropriate care obligations and potential advantages of siting data centers on brownfield sites as opposed to greenfields. The session will also address how the PFOA and PFOS CERCLA hazardous substance designations affect diligence scope and acquisition risk. Attorneys will leave with a practical framework for evaluating environmental conditions and protecting a client’s position before and after closing.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – State Brownfield Programs and Redevelopment Agreements for Contaminated Site Reuse | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session examines how state brownfield and voluntary cleanup programs structure liability protection, financial incentives, and regulatory closure for contaminated site redevelopment, with a focus on sites being developed as data centers. Attorneys will learn about program enrollment, site cleanup agreements, institutional controls, and no-further-action letters or the equivalent across multiple jurisdictions, with an emphasis on New York. Attendees leave with a practical framework for sequencing state program participation relative to deal milestones, identifying compatibility issues between site controls and data center operations, and working with state agencies.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast