Data Subject Requests Under the Microscope: Legal Frameworks, Operational Challenges, and Enforcement Risks Attorneys Must Know

Amber Thomson
Amber Thomson
Mayer Brown

Amber Thomson is a partner in Mayer Brown’s Cybersecurity and Privacy practice. She advises clients across industries on operationalizing privacy and cybersecurity compliance. She has deep experience helping organizations build scalable DSAR response programs, navigate complex data mapping challenges, and manage high-risk or sensitive requests.

Patrick J. Austin
Patrick J. Austin
Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC

Patrick focuses exclusively on cybersecurity and data privacy issues. His clients span industries such as banking, healthcare, manufacturing, high-tech, and energy. Patrick helps clients navigate complex and novel regulatory compliance issues associated with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and other information technology laws and frameworks.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 30, 2025

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – Understanding Personal Data Rights Under U.S. Consumer Data Privacy Laws – Patrick J. Austin

During the session, Mr. Austin will address best practices for reviewing and processing data subject requests (including examples of common data subject requests). He will discuss applicable legal and regulatory framework governing data subject requests, such as the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). He will also discuss potential penalties for failing to timely process data subject requests (along with applicable enforcement authorities). In addition, he is going to share tips and recommendations that organizations could use to develop data subject policies and protocols.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Basics of statutory data subject rights contained in various state consumer data privacy laws
  • The steps necessary to acknowledge and process a data subject request
  • Important processing timelines that must be followed
  • General strategies/tips for developing a data subject request compliance program

Session II – Operationalizing DSAR Compliance: Real-World Scenarios, Risk Management, and Internal Readiness – Amber Thomson

This session will offer a practical, operations-focused look at Data Subject Access Requests (DSARs), going beyond the legal requirements to explore how organizations can assess, manage, and streamline their response processes. Attendees will examine real-world scenarios, common pitfalls that lead to enforcement, and internal strategies for mapping data, assigning responsibilities, and handling sensitive or high-risk requests. The session also covers how to build effective DSAR protocols and response workflows that align with organizational risk tolerance and compliance goals.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What a DSAR really is and isn’t
  • Real-world DSAR scenarios and pitfalls
  • Organizational risk management
  • Enforcement trends and lessons learned
  • Assessing DSAR readiness
  • Designing effective DSAR response protocols

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 30, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Amber Thomson | Mayer Brown

Amber Thomson is a partner in Mayer Brown’s Cybersecurity and Privacy practice. She advises clients across industries on operationalizing privacy and cybersecurity compliance. She has deep experience helping organizations build scalable DSAR response programs, navigate complex data mapping challenges, and manage high-risk or sensitive requests. Amber also helps clients with privacy and data security due diligence and facilitates executive and board training on incident response, privacy legal compliance, and the US cybersecurity and privacy law landscape. She is a Certified AI Governance Professional (AIGP) through the IAPP and the Treasurer for the National Bar Association’s Privacy, Cybersecurity and Technology Section.

 

Patrick J. Austin | Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC

Patrick focuses exclusively on cybersecurity and data privacy issues. His clients span industries such as banking, healthcare, manufacturing, high-tech, and energy. Patrick helps clients navigate complex and novel regulatory compliance issues associated with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and other information technology laws and frameworks.

Patrick’s credentials in the field of cybersecurity and data privacy law are extensive. He is a Certified Information Privacy Professional in both U.S. and European law (CIPP/US & CIPP/E) by International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), which is accredited by the American Bar Association. Most recently, Patrick was designated as a Fellow of Information Privacy (FIP) and a Privacy Law Specialist (PLS) by the IAPP.

Patrick received his undergraduate degree from Old Dominion University and his law degree from George Mason University School of Law where he served as Editor-in-Chief of the National Security Law Journal.

Agenda

Session I – Understanding Personal Data Rights Under U.S. Consumer Data Privacy Laws | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • Basics of statutory data subject rights contained in various state consumer data privacy laws
  • The steps necessary to acknowledge and process a data subject request
  • Important processing timelines that must be followed
  • General strategies/tips for developing a data subject request compliance program

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Operationalizing DSAR Compliance: Real-World Scenarios, Risk Management, and Internal Readiness | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • What a DSAR really is and isn’t
  • Real-world DSAR scenarios and pitfalls
  • Organizational risk management
  • Enforcement trends and lessons learned
  • Assessing DSAR readiness
  • Designing effective DSAR response protocols

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86 Fri, October 10, 2025
Live Webcast
Using Copilot in Microsoft Excel for Lawyers
Using Copilot in Microsoft Excel for Lawyers Wed, October 15, 2025
Live Webcast