Good-Cause Eviction and Rent Caps for Landlord Counsel: Practical Considerations for New York & California

Shari S. Laskowitz
Shari S. Laskowitz
Tarter Krinsky & Drogin

Shari S. Laskowitz is a Partner and Co-Chair of the Landlord & Tenant Practice at Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP in New York, New York.

Tracey L. Merrell
Tracey L. Merrell
Law Office of Ada Cordero-Sacks

Tracey L. Merrell is a Los Angeles–based landlord-tenant attorney with the Law Office of Ada Cordero-Sacks, where she represents individual owners and multi-family residential property owners.

Live Video-Broadcast: December 17, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A Notice That Checks the Box Can Still Lose the Case

Since 2019, tenant-friendly states have passed a wave of good-cause eviction and rent-cap statutes. Two of the most stringent are New York's Good Cause Eviction Law (RPL 226-c and Article 6-A) and California's SB 567. They have forced owner-side counsel to rethink eviction and renewal practice from the ground up. New York Civil Courts are still splitting on how much specificity these notices require.

The risks start with the renewal cycle. Skip the RPL 231-c natural-person ownership schedule, and small-landlord status goes unproven. Exceed the cap without a justification file, and the increase has no support. Plead a holdover on bare “nonpayment,” and the RP Wimbledon/Wagab line invites dismissal. Demand use and occupancy instead of rent, and the predicate notice becomes the defect. Switch grounds midstream, and the case can be fatal.

You walk out with work product, not a doctrine survey: state-by-state cap and notice checklists for New York and California and sample predicate notice language built to withstand a motion to dismiss. You also get a working framework for the fatal-versus-curable call: oppose, amend, or discontinue and re-serve. These are judgment calls made before filing that no form or AI summary makes for you.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Exemption and Coverage Triage
    Sort each unit through the exemptions under both laws, New York's opt-in municipality overrides, and the RPL 231-c natural-person ownership schedule before pleading coverage or the commencement-date line.
  • Compliant Rent Increases
    Apply the definition of rent for increases, cap arithmetic, the notice calendar, and rent threshold requirements so every increase notice holds up.
  • Above-Threshold Justification Files
    Build New York's above-threshold justification file so it supports the increase at renewal and doubles as trial proof of good cause and exemption.
  • Predicate Notice Drafting
    Draft to the stricter standard in the particularity split—rent, not use and occupancy—and avoid the fatal errors that sink nonpayment-based holdovers.
  • Choosing the Right Proceeding
    Choose between a nonpayment holdover and a rent-demand proceeding, and plead intent-based, lease-change, owner-occupancy, and substantial-remodel grounds against affirmative defenses.
  • Fatal-Versus-Curable Decisions
    Decide when to oppose, amend, or discontinue and re-serve, and audit renewal-platform defaults to avoid liability for failing to comply with the ordinances.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 17, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Shari S. Laskowitz, Partner and Co-Chair, Landlord & Tenant Practice | Tarter Krinsky & Drogin

Shari S. Laskowitz is a Partner and Co-Chair of the Landlord & Tenant Practice at Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP in New York, New York. A seasoned litigator with more than 25 years of experience, she works closely with residential and commercial landlords on complex landlord-tenant disputes that arise throughout the development and management of their properties. Her clients include owners of multi-family residential properties, co-op and condo associations and owners, and landlords of office, retail, and restaurant properties.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Laskowitz earned her J.D. from New York Law School and her B.A. from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. She is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Laskowitz co-chairs the firm’s Landlord & Tenant Practice, and the New York Real Estate Journal featured her appointment to that role. She took part in “Lessons in Leadership: Industry Leaders Discuss Overcoming Challenges” at Green Pearl’s 2024 National Real Estate Women’s Forum.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Laskowitz speaks often on landlord-tenant law. She has presented “New York Evictions, Residential and Commercial” for Lorman Education Services, “Commercial Landlord & Tenant Overview” for the Madison Learning Center, and “Pets and the Law” for the New York Women’s Bar Association. Her firm profile also lists insights on New York’s rental market, including “New Legislation Affecting New York’s Rental Market: The Good Cause Eviction Law” (April 25, 2024) and “NYC Housing Providers Required to Conduct Bifurcated Screening for Criminal Background Checks on Prospective Tenants” (January 1, 2025).

  • Experience

Ms. Laskowitz handles a broad range of real estate disputes, including landlord-tenant and co-op/condo conflicts, and has deep experience with complex motion practice and trials in the New York State courts. For co-op boards, she advises on many matters, including terminating a shareholder’s proprietary lease because of nuisance conduct.

She also counsels landlords on breach of contract, real estate taxes, adjacent-property issues, community opposition, brokerage agreements, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Her practice includes business and partnership disputes, and she regularly represents clients in negotiations and arbitrations before the American Arbitration Association and JAMS.

 

Tracey L. Merrell, Attorney | Law Office of Ada Cordero-Sacks

Tracey L. Merrell is a Los Angeles–based landlord-tenant attorney with the Law Office of Ada Cordero-Sacks, where she represents individual owners and multi-family residential property owners. She is a frequent educator on California rent control and just cause eviction law.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Merrell earned her law degree, together with a Certificate on International and Comparative Law, from DePaul University College of Law, where she published two articles in the DePaul Rule of Law Journal in 2009. She graduated magna cum laude from CSUN with dual B.A. degrees in Deaf Studies and Political Science, and her languages include American Sign Language. She was admitted to the State Bar of California in 2009 and, in 2010, to the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Northern, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Before joining her current firm, Ms. Merrell served as Managing Partner of Education at Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP, where she trained clients and fellow attorneys on legal compliance with state and local laws throughout California. She serves as Advisory Director of Education for the Affordable Housing Management Association of Northern California and Hawaii (AHMA-NCH) and sat on its 2024 Board of Directors. She is also an Advisory Director of Cal NARPM and was named Volunteer of the Week by the Southern California Rental Housing Association.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Merrell is a sought-after speaker on landlord-tenant law, local rent control, fair housing, and legislative updates. She presented “Understanding State and Local Rent Control and Just Cause Eviction Laws” at NARPM Sacramento’s Residential Property Management Expo 2024, and has spoken at the Cal NARPM Conference, including a pre-conference legal workshop for property managers on habitability standards, tenant screening and applications, and contracts. She has also presented at the AOA Million Dollar Trade Show and Landlord Conference in Los Angeles. She has served as an editor of Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB) practice publications, including the CEB Evictions Guide and the Landlord Tenant Practice Guide. Since 2018, she has volunteered with the LA Law Library’s Ask a Lawyer sessions.

  • Experience

Ms. Merrell handles residential landlord-tenant matters from pre-trial strategy, discovery, and motion practice through bench and jury trials. She began her career handling high-volume post-foreclosure evictions for mortgage lenders in all 58 California counties before transitioning to individual-owner and multi-family residential litigation.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Exemption Triage and Above-Cap Increase Files Under Statewide Eviction Laws: New York & California | Shari S. Laskowitz & Tracey L. Merrell | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session shows owner-side counsel how to build each renewal cycle as an exemption and increase file under New York’s good-cause law and California’s rent caps. It walks through the exemptions under both laws, the practical considerations that shape each renewal, and the documentation owners need to support every notice and increase. Attendees will learn how to prove small-landlord status, how exemptions apply under both rent caps and just cause, and how the definition of rent affects the cap arithmetic and the notice calendar. The session also addresses when to advise owners to offer at the cap instead of defending a larger increase, with a focus on notices and files prepared for multistate portfolios, so counsel can make that call with confidence before a dispute ever begins.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Practical Aspects of Representing Landlords in New York & California | Shari S. Laskowitz & Tracey L. Merrell | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session covers owner-side New York Good Cause Eviction Law holdover practice for intermediate landlord counsel. It addresses pleading coverage and the commencement-date line, the RP Wimbledon/Wagab versus Bedrock/Inga particularity split, drafting the predicate notice to the stricter standard, and the fatal-versus-curable decision that follows when a notice is challenged. Attendees will examine withdrawal and owner-use grounds, the discovery exposure that intent-based grounds can open up, and the notice-drafting errors that can be fatal to a case. The session also explains when to re-serve rather than oppose, how to choose between a holdover based on nonpayment and a rent-demand proceeding, and how to prove good cause at trial, giving counsel a practical roadmap from the first notice through final judgment.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Tue, November 10, 2026
Live Webcast