Shari S. Laskowitz is a Partner and Co-Chair of the Landlord & Tenant Practice at Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP in New York, New York.
Tracey L. Merrell is a Los Angeles–based landlord-tenant attorney with the Law Office of Ada Cordero-Sacks, where she represents individual owners and multi-family residential property owners.
Live Video-Broadcast: December 17, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
A Notice That Checks the Box Can Still Lose the Case
Since 2019, tenant-friendly states have passed a wave of good-cause eviction and rent-cap statutes. Two of the most stringent are New York's Good Cause Eviction Law (RPL 226-c and Article 6-A) and California's SB 567. They have forced owner-side counsel to rethink eviction and renewal practice from the ground up. New York Civil Courts are still splitting on how much specificity these notices require.
The risks start with the renewal cycle. Skip the RPL 231-c natural-person ownership schedule, and small-landlord status goes unproven. Exceed the cap without a justification file, and the increase has no support. Plead a holdover on bare “nonpayment,” and the RP Wimbledon/Wagab line invites dismissal. Demand use and occupancy instead of rent, and the predicate notice becomes the defect. Switch grounds midstream, and the case can be fatal.
You walk out with work product, not a doctrine survey: state-by-state cap and notice checklists for New York and California and sample predicate notice language built to withstand a motion to dismiss. You also get a working framework for the fatal-versus-curable call: oppose, amend, or discontinue and re-serve. These are judgment calls made before filing that no form or AI summary makes for you.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: December 17, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Shari S. Laskowitz, Partner and Co-Chair, Landlord & Tenant Practice | Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Shari S. Laskowitz is a Partner and Co-Chair of the Landlord & Tenant Practice at Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP in New York, New York. A seasoned litigator with more than 25 years of experience, she works closely with residential and commercial landlords on complex landlord-tenant disputes that arise throughout the development and management of their properties. Her clients include owners of multi-family residential properties, co-op and condo associations and owners, and landlords of office, retail, and restaurant properties.
Ms. Laskowitz earned her J.D. from New York Law School and her B.A. from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. She is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.
Ms. Laskowitz co-chairs the firm’s Landlord & Tenant Practice, and the New York Real Estate Journal featured her appointment to that role. She took part in “Lessons in Leadership: Industry Leaders Discuss Overcoming Challenges” at Green Pearl’s 2024 National Real Estate Women’s Forum.
Ms. Laskowitz speaks often on landlord-tenant law. She has presented “New York Evictions, Residential and Commercial” for Lorman Education Services, “Commercial Landlord & Tenant Overview” for the Madison Learning Center, and “Pets and the Law” for the New York Women’s Bar Association. Her firm profile also lists insights on New York’s rental market, including “New Legislation Affecting New York’s Rental Market: The Good Cause Eviction Law” (April 25, 2024) and “NYC Housing Providers Required to Conduct Bifurcated Screening for Criminal Background Checks on Prospective Tenants” (January 1, 2025).
Ms. Laskowitz handles a broad range of real estate disputes, including landlord-tenant and co-op/condo conflicts, and has deep experience with complex motion practice and trials in the New York State courts. For co-op boards, she advises on many matters, including terminating a shareholder’s proprietary lease because of nuisance conduct.
She also counsels landlords on breach of contract, real estate taxes, adjacent-property issues, community opposition, brokerage agreements, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Her practice includes business and partnership disputes, and she regularly represents clients in negotiations and arbitrations before the American Arbitration Association and JAMS.
Tracey L. Merrell, Attorney | Law Office of Ada Cordero-Sacks
Tracey L. Merrell is a Los Angeles–based landlord-tenant attorney with the Law Office of Ada Cordero-Sacks, where she represents individual owners and multi-family residential property owners. She is a frequent educator on California rent control and just cause eviction law.
Ms. Merrell earned her law degree, together with a Certificate on International and Comparative Law, from DePaul University College of Law, where she published two articles in the DePaul Rule of Law Journal in 2009. She graduated magna cum laude from CSUN with dual B.A. degrees in Deaf Studies and Political Science, and her languages include American Sign Language. She was admitted to the State Bar of California in 2009 and, in 2010, to the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Northern, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California.
Before joining her current firm, Ms. Merrell served as Managing Partner of Education at Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP, where she trained clients and fellow attorneys on legal compliance with state and local laws throughout California. She serves as Advisory Director of Education for the Affordable Housing Management Association of Northern California and Hawaii (AHMA-NCH) and sat on its 2024 Board of Directors. She is also an Advisory Director of Cal NARPM and was named Volunteer of the Week by the Southern California Rental Housing Association.
Ms. Merrell is a sought-after speaker on landlord-tenant law, local rent control, fair housing, and legislative updates. She presented “Understanding State and Local Rent Control and Just Cause Eviction Laws” at NARPM Sacramento’s Residential Property Management Expo 2024, and has spoken at the Cal NARPM Conference, including a pre-conference legal workshop for property managers on habitability standards, tenant screening and applications, and contracts. She has also presented at the AOA Million Dollar Trade Show and Landlord Conference in Los Angeles. She has served as an editor of Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB) practice publications, including the CEB Evictions Guide and the Landlord Tenant Practice Guide. Since 2018, she has volunteered with the LA Law Library’s Ask a Lawyer sessions.
Ms. Merrell handles residential landlord-tenant matters from pre-trial strategy, discovery, and motion practice through bench and jury trials. She began her career handling high-volume post-foreclosure evictions for mortgage lenders in all 58 California counties before transitioning to individual-owner and multi-family residential litigation.
SESSION 1 – Exemption Triage and Above-Cap Increase Files Under Statewide Eviction Laws: New York & California | Shari S. Laskowitz & Tracey L. Merrell | 2:30pm – 3:30pm
This session shows owner-side counsel how to build each renewal cycle as an exemption and increase file under New York’s good-cause law and California’s rent caps. It walks through the exemptions under both laws, the practical considerations that shape each renewal, and the documentation owners need to support every notice and increase. Attendees will learn how to prove small-landlord status, how exemptions apply under both rent caps and just cause, and how the definition of rent affects the cap arithmetic and the notice calendar. The session also addresses when to advise owners to offer at the cap instead of defending a larger increase, with a focus on notices and files prepared for multistate portfolios, so counsel can make that call with confidence before a dispute ever begins.
BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm
SESSION 2 – Practical Aspects of Representing Landlords in New York & California | Shari S. Laskowitz & Tracey L. Merrell | 3:40pm – 4:40pm
This session covers owner-side New York Good Cause Eviction Law holdover practice for intermediate landlord counsel. It addresses pleading coverage and the commencement-date line, the RP Wimbledon/Wagab versus Bedrock/Inga particularity split, drafting the predicate notice to the stricter standard, and the fatal-versus-curable decision that follows when a notice is challenged. Attendees will examine withdrawal and owner-use grounds, the discovery exposure that intent-based grounds can open up, and the notice-drafting errors that can be fatal to a case. The session also explains when to re-serve rather than oppose, how to choose between a holdover based on nonpayment and a rent-demand proceeding, and how to prove good cause at trial, giving counsel a practical roadmap from the first notice through final judgment.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General