The Tripartite Relationship: A guide for insurance defense attorneys

Heather M. Beam
Jessica Ogin
Travis Hookham
Heather M. Beam | Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP
Jessica Ogin | Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP
Travis Hookham | Lanza Law Firm, PC

On-Demand: September 25, 2024

2 hour CLE

This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ live webinars.
Learn More

Program Summary

Session I - Tripartite Issues: Challenges and solutions for insurance defense attorneys – Heather M. Beam, Jessica Ogin

This session will cover the challenges and solutions when tripartite issues arise in insurance defense. This program is designed to equip insurance defense attorneys with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively manage the tripartite relationship between the insurer, insured, and defense attorney.

Key Topics

  • Legal and ethical foundations of the tripartite relationship, the roles and obligations of each party, and the potential challenges that can arise
  • Examples of conflicts of interest between insurers and insureds and strategies for managing and resolving these conflicts while adhering to legal and ethical standards
  • Effective communication and risk management strategies

Session II - Tripartite Issues in PI Cases – Travis Hookham

In a third-party insurance claim, there are three parties: The insured (first party), the insurance company (second party), and another individual, typically the claimant (third party). Be it third party payor or an “human counsel” type of case. This session sets out to outline common pitfalls and things to look out for along the way when considering a tripartite scope of representation.

Key Topics

  • Common issues in tripartite representation
  • Navigating the pitfalls of tripartite representation
  • Illustrated though Texas case law

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Heather M. Beam_FedBarHeather M. Beam | Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP

Heather Beam focuses her practice on complex design and construction litigation in arbitrations, state court, and federal court. She has successfully represented general contractors, subcontractors, architects, engineers, surveyors, realtors, and brokers in residential, commercial, and highway projects.

Her practice includes the defense of design and construction defects, construction site injuries and fatalities, and allegations of fraud and concealment of defects when properties are sold. Heather also has experience drafting contracts for design professionals and contractors at the beginning of projects, advising clients during ongoing construction projects when problems arise, and negotiating claims to help her clients avoid litigation.

She also handles representing clients in professional licensure board complaints. Heather prides herself on keeping her clients informed as a case develops. By actively communicating with her clients at each step of the litigation process, she fine-tunes her approach so that she is constantly focusing on the best interests of her clients. She is also an active member of several professional organizations in Travis County and enjoys speaking on issues that face contractors, subcontractors, and design professionals.

 

Jessica Ogin_FedBarJessica Ogin | Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP

Jessica Ogin focuses her practice primarily on complex construction and design defect litigation. Prior to joining the firm, Jessica was an assistant county attorney in Harris County where she represented county employees in a variety of matters including car accidents, premises liability claims, and employment matters. Jessica has experience in appellate work, motion practice, and mediation.

 

Travis Hookham_FedBarTravis Hookham | Lanza Law Firm, PC

Travis Hookham is an associate attorney and mediator at Lanza Law Firm, PC, a civil trial law firm serving the legal needs of businesses and individuals throughout the State of Texas. Travis specializes in insurance defense work, representing insurers and their insureds in a variety of litigation matters, including personal injury, property damage, premises liability, and professional liability.

Travis joined Lanza Law Firm in 2023 after graduating from the South Texas College of Law. Travis received his master’s degree in Global Affairs from Thunderbird School of Global Management, a unit of Arizona State university in 2017. Travis received his bachelor’s in business administration from the University of Houston in 2014.

Travis is admitted to practice law in Texas. He is a member of the State Bar of Texas and the Houston Bar Association.

Travis is committed to providing quality legal services to his clients, with a focus on achieving favorable results through effective advocacy and strategic counseling. He is also dedicated to staying abreast of the latest developments and trends in insurance law and civil litigation.

When he is not working, Travis enjoys spending time with his family and friends, and traveling.

Agenda

Session I – Tripartite Issues: Challenges and solutions for insurance defense attorneys | 11:00am – 12:00pm

  • Legal and ethical foundations of the tripartite relationship, the roles and obligations of each party, and the potential challenges that can arise
  • Examples of conflicts of interest between insurers and insureds and strategies for managing and resolving these conflicts while adhering to legal and ethical standards
  • Effective communication and risk management strategies

Break | 12:00pm – 12:10pm

Session II – Tripartite Issues in PI Cases | 12:10pm – 1:10pm

  • Common issues in tripartite representation
    • Conflicting Loyalties: The Insured vs. The Insurer
    • The “Empty Chair” defense
    • Ex Parte communications
    • Disclosure of confidential information
  • Navigating the pitfalls of tripartite representation
    • Identify conflicts early
    • Obtain informed consent
    • Maintain clear communication
    • Consider independent counsel
    • Document everything
  • Illustrated though Texas case law
    • Stowers demand and bad faith
    • Reservation of rights and non-waiver agreements
    • “Tilley” duties and the tripartite relationship

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 General, 1 Ethics

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 General, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 General, 1 Ethics

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 General, 1 Ethics

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Ethics credits can ONLY be earned through Live-Webcast programs, the Maine Board of Bar Examiners does not approve Ethics through On-Demand sessions.
Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 General, 1 Ethics

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General, 60 Ethics Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Attorney Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 General, 1 Ethics

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law and Legal, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Ethics credits can ONLY be earned through Live-Webcast programs, the Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners does not approve Ethics through On-Demand sessions.
West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Deposing the Financial Expert (2025 Edition)
Deposing the Financial Expert (2025 Edition) Fri, March 14, 2025
Live Webcast
Microsoft Copilot 365 AI tool for Lawyers (Part 1)
Microsoft Copilot 365 AI tool for Lawyers (Part 1) Fri, March 14, 2025
Live Webcast
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases Thu, March 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition)
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
Live Webcast
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition)
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts Mon, March 24, 2025
Live Webcast
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation Wed, March 26, 2025
Live Webcast
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, March 27, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay