Using Occam’s Razor to Resolve International Attorney–Client Privilege Choice of Law Issues

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal
Francesca Giannoni-Crystal | Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal is a dually qualified U.S. and Italian attorney whose practice bridges Civil Law and Common Law systems, with over two decades of experience advising multinational corporations, law firms, and financial institutions. She focuses on cross-border ethics, international professional responsibility, and multijurisdictional practice issues, often serving as a “lawyer for lawyers” on complex matters involving conflicts of interest, privilege, and professional-conduct compliance.

Live Video-Broadcast: April 16, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
All-Access Pass

Free access to all CLE programs w/active subscription. Annual subscription only $395/yr.

Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

What Will You Learn

Attorneys will learn to identify competing choice-of-law approaches governing attorney–client privilege in cross-border disputes, including lex fori, Restatement § 139, and the "touch base" test.

What Will You Gain

Attorneys will gain practical strategies for structuring international communications, managing cross-border teams, and minimizing waiver and disclosure risks in international disputes and investigations.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Privilege basics
    • Distinguish attorney–client privilege from confidentiality duties and work product protection.
  • Choice of law
    • Analyze six competing frameworks U.S. courts apply to cross-border privilege disputes.
  • Cross-Border patterns
    • Identify fact patterns involving foreign counsel, patent agents, and parallel proceedings.
  • In-House counsel
    • Evaluate privilege risks arising from communications involving foreign in-house lawyers.
  • Communication strategy
    • Structure international communications and documentation to preserve privilege across jurisdictions.
  • Occam's framework
    • Apply a modified lex fori approach to simplify privilege choice-of-law analysis.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: April 16, 2026 

  • 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 11:00 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal | Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal is a dually qualified U.S. and Italian attorney whose practice bridges Civil Law and Common Law systems, with over two decades of experience advising multinational corporations, law firms, and financial institutions. She focuses on cross-border ethics, international professional responsibility, and multijurisdictional practice issues, often serving as a “lawyer for lawyers” on complex matters involving conflicts of interest, privilege, and professional-conduct compliance. As co-founder of Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC, she provides guidance on navigating overlapping legal regimes, particularly in international transactions and cross-border representation. She also contributes to advancing education in this field through her work with Technethics, an initiative dedicated to ethics, technology, and global legal compliance.

  • Education & Credentials

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal is dually qualified as an attorney in both the United States and Italy, enabling her to operate across Civil Law and Common Law systems. Her credentials support a practice centered on international legal ethics, professional responsibility, and cross-border compliance.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal demonstrates leadership as co-founder of Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC and through her role in Technethics, an educational platform focused on ethics, technology, and cross-border legal compliance. Her work positions her as a key contributor to the development of best practices in multijurisdictional legal ethics.

  • Professional Involvement

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal is actively involved in advising law firms and legal professionals on cross-border ethics, conflicts of interest, international privileges, and professional-conduct compliance. Through her work with Technethics, she contributes to education and dialogue on the evolving challenges at the intersection of technology, ethics, and global legal practice.

  • Experience

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal has over 20 years of experience advising multinational corporations, law firms, and financial institutions on international legal and ethical issues. Prior to co-founding Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC in 2011 with Professor Nathan M. Crystal, she served as a legal consultant for the Italian Industrial Association and practiced with Deloitte Legal, handling transactional and regulatory matters for global enterprises. She later managed legal affairs for a publicly traded Italian company with subsidiaries across multiple jurisdictions, including the United States, United Kingdom, China, and Brazil, overseeing international contracts, data privacy, and corporate governance. Her work continues to focus on helping attorneys and firms manage risks associated with multijurisdictional professional-conduct rules.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Attorney–Client Privilege vs. Confidentiality and Work Product | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

This section provides a guide of attorney–client privilege, distinguishing it from ethical confidentiality duties and work product protection, while explaining its evidentiary nature under federal law, including Rule 501 and applicable state privilege rules in diversity jurisdiction cases.

SESSION 2 – Cross-Border Attorney–Client Privilege Issues | 1:10pm – 1:20pm

This section examines attorney–client privilege challenges in cross-border and international contexts, focusing on conflicts arising from differing legal standards, inconsistent protections, and the complexities created by communications spanning multiple jurisdictions with divergent privilege doctrines.

SESSION 3 – The Proliferation of Choice-Of-Law Approaches in U.S. Courts | 1:20pm – 1:30pm

This section reviews the proliferation of choice-of-law approaches used by U.S. courts, including lex fori, Restatement Section 139, most significant relationship tests, touch base analysis, law of the decision, and comity-based frameworks applied in privilege determinations.

SESSION 4 – Common Cross-Border Fact Patterns Raising Privilege Uncertainty | 1:30pm – 1:40pm

This section analyzes common cross-border scenarios creating privilege uncertainty, including communications with foreign in-house counsel, multinational transactions, involvement of foreign lawyers or consultants, and parallel proceedings involving cross-border discovery under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782.

SESSION 5 – Practical Guidance for Lawyers | 1:40pm – 1:50pm

This section provides practical guidance for attorneys, including strategies for structuring international communications, managing cross-border legal teams, maintaining documentation, and proactively addressing privilege risks, discovery disputes, and forum selection considerations in complex international matters.

SESSION 6 – Application of Occam’s Razor to Privilege Choice-Of-Law | 1:50pm – 2:00pm

This section explores applying Occam’s Razor to privilege choice-of-law analysis, proposing a modified lex fori approach to simplify competing doctrines, enhance predictability, and support more efficient and fair outcomes in cross-border privilege disputes.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 Dual

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 Ethics / Professionalism Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 Ethics / Professionalism

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars