Copyright on Trial in the AI Era: Defending Companies, Protecting Creators, and Managing Litigation Risks

Chirag Shah
Catherine Stihler
Ana Juneja
Hemant Gupta
Chirag Shah | University of Washington
Catherine Stihler | Habitat for Humanity Monterey Bay
Ana Juneja | Ana Law
Hemant Gupta | Epstein Becker & Green, P.C

Live Video-Broadcast: September 18, 2025

2.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $245.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I - Copyright Litigation in the Age of Generative AI: Technical, Corporate, and Creator Perspectives - Hemant Gupta, Ana Juneja, Chirag Shah

This panel will provide a 360-degree view of copyright litigation in the age of generative AI. Chirag Shah will open with the technical foundation, explaining how generative AI tools create text, images, and other works, highlighting both their capabilities and limitations, and illustrating these issues with recent copyright challenges. Hemant Gupta will then bring the defense and corporate perspective, examining how doctrines such as substantial similarity, derivative works, and fair use are being tested, analyzing key pending cases, and outlining practical strategies for risk assessment and mitigation, from evaluating training data and negotiating vendor contracts to implementing corporate AI policies and response protocols. Finally, Ana will provide the plaintiff and creator perspective, exploring how rights holders frame copyright claims against AI platforms, why they argue training is not transformative and causes market harm, and the strategies they use to demonstrate infringement and lost licensing opportunities. She will also highlight the industries and creators most affected and share insights into the litigation and settlement dynamics that are emerging as creators challenge AI companies. Together, these perspectives will give attendees a balanced and practical understanding of how copyright law is evolving in response to generative AI.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • AI synopsis, its capabilities and limitations
  • Technical explanation of how generative AI tools produce content
  • Examples of creative content generation and legal challenges
  • Essential copyright concepts for AI context (substantial similarity, fair use, derivative works)
  • Key pending litigation and their potential implications
  • How traditional copyright doctrines are being tested by AI technology
  • Evaluating AI platforms based on training data sources
  • Contractual protection and red flags in vendor agreements
  • Proactive risk mitigation: Corporate AI usage policies, monitoring systems, and response protocols
  • How plaintiffs and rights holders frame copyright claims against AI developers and platforms
  • Fair use arguments from the plaintiff’s side (why training may not be transformative, market harm, etc.)
  • Strategies for demonstrating infringement, substantial similarity, or lost licensing opportunities
  • The kinds of creators and industries most directly affected (authors, artists, software developers, etc.)
  • Litigation and settlement dynamics when creators challenge AI companies

Session II - Reimagining Copyright in the Age of AI: A Path to Creative Renewal or Restriction? - Catherine Stihler

In this session, Catherine will explore the current landscape of copyright reform internationally as it intersects with generative artificial intelligence, sharing insights from her time working in open technology and open licensing. Drawing on recent policy shifts, stakeholder consultations, and global debates, Catherine will highlight strategies to ensure that copyright law supports innovation, upholds public interest, and maintains equitable access to knowledge. The discussion will spotlight approaches to balancing creator rights and the commons, and how thoughtful reform can help us navigate AI for the public good.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Copyright reform and AI
  • Public interest AI and community response
  • Navigating public Interest and innovation

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 18, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:50 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:50 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:50 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:50 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Chirag Shah | University of Washington

Chirag Shah is Professor of Information and Computer Science at University of Washington (UW) in Seattle. He is the Founding Director for InfoSeeking Lab and Founding Co-Director of Center for Responsibility in AI Systems & Experiences (RAISE). His research focuses on building, auditing, and correcting agentic information access systems. Shah is a Distinguished Member of ACM as well as ASIS&T, and a Senior Member of IEEE. He has published nearly 200 peer-reviewed articles and authored eight books, including textbooks on data science and machine learning. He also works closely with industrial research labs on cutting-edge problems, typically as a visiting researcher. The most recent engagements include Amazon, ByteDance, Getty Images, Microsoft Research, and Spotify.

 

Catherine Stihler | Habitat for Humanity Monterey Bay

Catherine Stihler is a distinguished international leader in open technology, advocacy, and affordable home ownership. Renowned for her ability to build strategic partnerships and lead transformative campaigns, she has guided global organizations to meaningful impact and long-term success.

Catherine has served as CEO of two major international nonprofits, the Open Knowledge Foundation and Creative Commons. Under her leadership, both organizations achieved significant growth, strengthened global reach, and advanced their missions through innovative partnerships and fundraising success.

A prominent voice in the field of public interest AI, Catherine has contributed to the Governor of Pennsylvania’s AI Task Force, collaborated with the World Economic Forum’s AI Alliance, and advised the U.S. National AI Committee. She also serves on the Filecoin Advisory Board and is a 2024 Global Blockchain Business Council (GBBC) Ambassador, positioning her at the intersection of AI, blockchain, and responsible governance.

In 2024, Catherine founded Veda Insights LLC, providing strategic advisory services to executives and boards navigating technology and regulatory disruption. She also advises Vero AI, the startup behind the Iris platform and Violet impact framework, helping to shape ethical, human-centered AI innovation.

With more than two decades of experience shaping European policy, Catherine brings unique expertise in bridging regulation and innovation. She helps organizations achieve bold, impactful goals while ensuring compliance with complex international frameworks.

In July 2024, Catherine became CEO of Habitat for Humanity Monterey Bay, where she leads efforts to expand affordable home ownership and strengthen community resilience in her adopted home.

 

Ana Juneja_FedBarAna Juneja | Ana Law

As an award-winning intellectual property attorney and the founder of Ana Law®, Ana Juneja helps celebrities, athletes, influencers, start-ups, entrepreneurs, and corporations secure + monetize their brands and ideas in the US and abroad.

Ana Law® is the first and only law firm that offers flat-fee, 100% guaranteed patent, trademark, and copyright services. Ana has a 100% success rate and often speaks on important topics such as emerging legal issues surrounding security, AI, and social media.

Additionally, Ana has extensive experience with social media intellectual property infringement issues. Ana’s insider connections with premier media agencies allow her to have direct access to key social media platforms, such as Meta (Facebook/Instagram), TikTok, and Twitter. These essential services are an important component of the brand protection strategy for Ana’s celebrity, athlete, & influencer clients.

 

Hemant Gupta | Epstein Becker & Green, P.C

When health care systems, AI health care innovators, and major brands face complex challenges in technology transactions, data ownership, and intellectual property (IP) protection, they turn to attorney Hemant Gupta. With a distinctive blend of technical experience and business acumen, Hemant advises clients at the intersection of health care, technology, and law—helping organizations commercialize digital health solutions while safeguarding their most valuable assets.

Hemant’s practice spans strategic IP portfolio management, brand protection, and health care technology transactions. He manages trademark and patent portfolios for major companies, guiding marketing teams and business leaders through IP acquisition, enforcement, and protection strategies that deliver real-world value.

In the health care technology space, Hemant structures and negotiates critical agreements, including AI integration contracts, IP clearances, data licensing and sharing arrangements, clinical collaboration agreements, and SaaS and cloud computing contracts. Drawing on his graduate training in molecular biology and prior career in cancer research at a leading children’s hospital, he brings unique insight into both the science and regulation of health care technology.

As AI reshapes health care delivery, Hemant counsels software vendors and health systems on legal frameworks for AI implementation, training data ownership, algorithm development, and compliance strategies. His experience as a programmer and systems administrator—combined with certifications in data privacy and cybersecurity—makes him a trusted advisor for clients deploying emerging technologies in sensitive regulatory environments.

Health care technology companies also rely on Hemant to structure their IP and technology assets for maximum value in strategic corporate transactions, investment, and acquisition. He has deep experience in designing commercialization programs, negotiating enterprise software agreements, and developing global IP strategies that align with corporate growth objectives.

Before joining Epstein Becker Green, Hemant served as a partner at a national technology law firm and as IP Group leader at an international firm. He is also active in the health care innovation ecosystem, working with accelerators in the digital health and medical device sectors.

Agenda

Session I – Copyright Litigation in the Age of Generative AI: Technical, Corporate, and Creator Perspectives | 1:00pm – 3:10pm

  • AI synopsis, its capabilities and limitations
  • Technical explanation of how generative AI tools produce content
  • Examples of creative content generation and legal challenges
  • Essential copyright concepts for AI context (substantial similarity, fair use, derivative works)
  • Key pending litigation and their potential implications
  • How traditional copyright doctrines are being tested by AI technology
  • Evaluating AI platforms based on training data sources

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

  • Contractual protection and red flags in vendor agreements
  • Proactive risk mitigation: Corporate AI usage policies, monitoring systems, and response protocols
  • How plaintiffs and rights holders frame copyright claims against AI developers and platforms
  • Fair use arguments from the plaintiff’s side (why training may not be transformative, market harm, etc.)
  • Strategies for demonstrating infringement, substantial similarity, or lost licensing opportunities
  • The kinds of creators and industries most directly affected (authors, artists, software developers, etc.)
  • Litigation and settlement dynamics when creators challenge AI companies

Break | 3:10pm – 3:20pm

Session II – Reimagining Copyright in the Age of AI: A Path to Creative Renewal or Restriction? | 3:20pm – 3:50pm

  • Copyright reform and AI
    • Understanding recent legal updates, the evolving standards for AI-generated works, and the flexibility of existing copyright law
  • Public interest AI and community response
    • How current discussions are shaping public interest policy, balancing creator agency with access to knowledge
  • Navigating public Interest and innovation
    • Frameworks for integrating AI with copyright law to serve cultural production, accessibility, and the broader public interest

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
3 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
150 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Contingent Fee Deferral: Strategies & Options
Contingent Fee Deferral: Strategies & Options Fri, September 5, 2025
Live Webcast
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court Tue, September 9, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Interpreting Financial Statements: What Attorneys Need to Know
Interpreting Financial Statements: What Attorneys Need to Know Thu, September 11, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
The Partition of Real Property Act and Probate, Trusts, and Estate
The Partition of Real Property Act and Probate, Trusts, and Estate Thu, September 11, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, September 12, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition)
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition) Fri, September 12, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts Thu, September 18, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using Copilot in Microsoft Word for Lawyers
Using Copilot in Microsoft Word for Lawyers Thu, September 18, 2025
Live Webcast