Investigating Suspected FMLA Abuse and Defending the Termination in 2026

Lisa C. Hamasaki
Lisa C. Hamasaki
Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C

Lisa C. Hamasaki is a Partner in the San Francisco office of Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C., where she represents employers across California in labor and employment matters. Over a career of more than 25 years, she has counseled companies on California and federal employment law and defended them in state and federal courts, in arbitration, and before administrative agencies. Before joining the firm, she spent more than five years leading her prior firm's San Francisco office as its Managing Shareholder while maintaining an active employment law practice.

Nivritha C. Ketty
Nivritha C. Ketty
Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C

Nivritha (“Nivi”) C. Ketty is a Partner at Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C., bringing both law firm and in-house experience in employment law for clients across a range of industries. Before joining the firm, she served as Associate General Counsel, Employment Law at University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey, where she advised on compliance with employment and labor laws including the FMLA, ADA, FLSA, and USERRA, supervised workplace investigations and outside litigation counsel, and represented her employer before state and federal regulatory agencies

Live Video-Broadcast: September 25, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Honest-Belief Defense Now Rises or Falls on the Quality of the Investigation

Personnel decisions after protected leave are no longer judged by yesterday's rules. The Sixth Circuit's honest-belief ruling in Porter v. Jackson Township Highway Department ties the defense to the quality of the investigation behind it. State-level presumption regimes are spreading, and the circuit split over the standard of proof for retaliation claims continues.

Question protected leave carelessly and you invite interference, retaliation, and discrimination claims. Skip the FMLA's certification and recertification tools and the record thins. Apply policy inconsistently and comparators turn against you. Build a weak file and juries respond — Boyle v. Wayfair produced a $4.7 million PFMLA retaliation verdict.

This program delivers a working framework: when an investigation is warranted, which methods — interviews, surveillance, social media review — are permissible, and how to evaluate evidence before acting. Attendees leave with guidance on causation standards, timing and comparator evidence, and documentation that supports the termination decision and withstands scrutiny in litigation.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Deciding to Investigate
    How to distinguish legitimate indicators of FMLA leave abuse from assumptions, frustration, or conduct that remains protected before opening an investigation.
  • Permissible Investigative Methods
    Which tools — employee interviews, social media review, surveillance, and attendance records — are lawful, and the interference and retaliation risks each one creates.
  • FMLA Compliance Tools
    When the FMLA's certification and recertification procedures should replace, or run alongside, other investigative measures in a leave-abuse inquiry.
  • Building a Defensible Record
    What evidence supports a good-faith determination of leave abuse, and how documentation, consistency, comparators, and timing hold up before termination or other personnel action.
  • Honest Belief and Causation
    How Porter v. Jackson Township Highway Department frames the honest-belief defense, and how the but-for versus motivating-factor circuit split changes retaliation proof.
  • Presumptions and Verdict Lessons
    How state-law retaliation presumption regimes and the $4.7 million Boyle v. Wayfair PFMLA verdict reshape post-leave litigation risk and defense strategy.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 25, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Lisa C. Hamasaki, Partner | Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C

Lisa C. Hamasaki is a Partner in the San Francisco office of Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C., where she represents employers across California in labor and employment matters. Over a career of more than 25 years, she has counseled companies on California and federal employment law and defended them in state and federal courts, in arbitration, and before administrative agencies. Before joining the firm, she spent more than five years leading her prior firm’s San Francisco office as its Managing Shareholder while maintaining an active employment law practice.

  • Education & Credentials

Lisa earned her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1998 and her B.A. from Bates College in 1995, and studied at St. Peter’s College, Oxford University, in 1993. She is admitted to practice in California and before the United States District Courts for the Northern, Central, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Lisa received the National Association of Women Lawyers’ Virginia S. Mueller Outstanding Member Award and was selected to the Northern California Super Lawyers list from 2012 through 2024. San Francisco Magazine has named her among the Top Attorneys in Northern California (2015–2024) and the Top Women Attorneys in Northern California (2014–2024). At Ogletree Deakins, she served as San Francisco Office Managing Shareholder from 2020 to 2025.

  • Professional Involvement

Lisa co-chaired regional conferences for the National Employment Law Council from 2018 to 2025 and serves on its Annual Meeting Host Committee. Within the National Association of Women Lawyers, she co-chaired the Annual Meetings in 2023 and 2024, served on the Annual Meeting Host Committee, and has co-chaired NAWL Research since 2025. She previously co-chaired the Labor & Employment Practice Area Committees of the National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms from 2014 to 2018, and authored “Reframing the Thinking Around Workplace Harassment” for Bloomberg Big Law in June 2018.

  • Experience

Lisa litigates claims involving harassment, discrimination, retaliation, disability accommodations, leaves of absence, wrongful termination, defamation, and wage and hour matters for employers across a wide range of industries. She advises on workplace disputes, employment policies, employee discipline and separations, wage and hour compliance, disability accommodations, and leave management, and regularly conducts workplace investigations. A frequent speaker and trainer at conferences and industry events nationwide, her recent programs address managing performance after a complaint, California leaves of absence, and challenging accommodation issues. Her career spans Reed Smith (1998–2006),
Miller Law Group (2006–2018), and Ogletree Deakins, where she was a Shareholder (2018–2026) before joining Nukk-Freeman & Cerra.

 

Nivritha C. Ketty, Partner | Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C.

Nivritha (“Nivi”) C. Ketty is a Partner at Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C., bringing both law firm and in-house experience in employment law for clients across a range of industries. Before joining the firm, she served as Associate General Counsel, Employment Law at University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey, where she advised on compliance with employment and labor laws including the FMLA, ADA, FLSA, and USERRA, supervised workplace investigations and outside litigation counsel, and represented her employer before state and federal regulatory agencies.

  • Education & Credentials

Nivi earned her J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2007 and her B.A. in Political Science from Stanford University in 2002. She is admitted to practice in New Jersey and New York and before the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. From 2015 to 2016 she clerked for the Honorable Michael A. Shipp, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Nivi was named an NJBIZ Leader in Law honoree in 2025 and was selected to the New Jersey Rising Stars list in 2020. She received the Legal Aid Society’s Pro Bono Publico Award in 2013 and the Thurgood Marshall Award in 2008. She serves as a member of her firm’s DEI Council.

  • Professional Involvement

Nivi co-chairs the Labor & Employment Practice Area Committee of the National Association of Women Owned Law Firms and is involved with Volunteer Lawyers for Justice. She speaks regularly on employment law, with recent programs addressing cultural competence in the workplace, tricky terminations, difficult disability scenarios, DEI legal risk, and how workplace investigations are used in litigation.

  • Experience

At Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, Nivi works closely with senior management, human resources professionals, and business owners on advice and risk analysis spanning employment law from hiring to termination, with particular depth in restructures and reductions in force, leaves and accommodations, and wage and hour compliance. She regularly conducts both privileged and nonprivileged workplace investigations into allegations of harassment, misconduct, compliance, and discrimination, has served as an independent investigator on dozens of investigations, and assists clients in developing internal investigation policies and processes and in training investigators. Earlier in her career, she practiced as an associate at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP in New York from 2007 to 2015.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – From Suspicion to Action: Planning and Conducting a Defensible FMLA or Leave Abuse Investigation | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

Investigating suspected FMLA and leave abuse requires careful judgment, disciplined documentation, and a clear understanding of the legal risks involved. Because questioning or investigating protected leave can expose employers to serious interference, retaliation, and discrimination claims, employers must be able to distinguish legitimate concerns from assumptions, frustration, or inconsistent application of policy.

This session will address best practices for determining when an FMLA or leave abuse investigation is warranted, how to structure and conduct an investigation without undermining protected rights, and how to evaluate evidence before taking action. Attendees will also learn key considerations employers should assess before making a termination decision or imposing other personnel-related consequences, including documentation, consistency, timing, decision-maker involvement, and risk mitigation strategies.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Post-Leave Terminations: Litigation Risks, Recent Developments, and Practical Strategies | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

Post-leave termination decisions continue to present significant litigation risk for employers, particularly as courts refine the standards governing retaliation, causation, and employer decision-making following protected leave. This session will examine the evolving litigation landscape for employers defending post-leave terminations, with a focus on the impact of recent court decisions and emerging legal theories that may affect how these cases are evaluated and defended.

The discussion will include analysis of the Sixth Circuit’s honest-belief ruling in Porter v. Jackson Township Highway Department, discussion of recent leave related verdicts (including the $4.7 million PFMLA retaliation verdict in Boyle v. Wayfair), and issues including the trend toward state-level presumption regimes, and the continuing circuit split over the standard of proof for retaliation claims. Against this developing legal backdrop, the speakers will provide practical guidance on best practices for deciding upon, evaluating, and documenting termination decisions involving employees who have recently taken protected leave, as well as guidance related to defending against such claims in litigation and otherwise. The goal is to provide attorneys with a practical framework for assessing risk and strengthening the defensibility of personnel decisions both before they are made and after the case is filed.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast