Representing College Athletes in the Private-Capital Era: NIL Deals and Revenue-Share Contracts

Joshua Frieser
John Long
Ken Witt
Joshua Frieser | Frieser Legal
John Long | Kutak Rock LLP
Ken Witt | Kutak Rock LLP

Live Video-Broadcast: August 7, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

The House v. NCAA settlement permits Division I institutions to compensate student-athletes directly. The cap begins at approximately $20.5 million for 2025–26 and rises over the settlement term. PE-backed spin-offs, conference credit facilities, and equity proposals are pushing college athletics from a donor-based model toward an investment model.

Every provision now carries regulatory weight. Structure a deal that fails Deloitte's FMV review, and it gets flagged. Draft payment terms carelessly, and you create Title IX, employment-status, wage-and-hour, or tax exposure. Accept overbroad exclusivity, transfer clawbacks, or perpetual IP rights, and your athlete-client pays for years. Two Executive Orders and pending federal legislation keep the ground moving.

Attendees leave with a practical framework for drafting, negotiating, and auditing NIL agreements. They gain the tools to evaluate revenue-share contracts against the House settlement framework and the CSC compliance regime. And they walk out with drafting protections that preserve flexibility while the regulatory framework continues to evolve.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • House Settlement Framework
    Apply the House v. NCAA settlement's approximately $20.5 million institutional cap — including cap allocation, adjustment, and escalation over the settlement term — to every agreement you evaluate.
  • Compliance Review Architecture
    Structure deals that survive Deloitte's FMV review and NIL Go, and keep clients inside the College Sports Commission's compliance regime.
  • Private-Capital Counterparties
    Negotiate against PE-backed collectives, school commercial entities, and multimedia rights companies — and price the payment-source risk behind PE-backed spin-offs, conference credit facilities, and equity proposals.
  • Contract Red Flags
    Identify and neutralize overbroad exclusivity, transfer clawbacks, perpetual IP rights, and exploitative agent fee structures before your athlete-client signs.
  • Core Contract Provisions
    Draft escalation, termination, and NIL-interaction clauses that hold up against transfer-related restrictions, liquidated damages, buyout enforceability, and emerging litigation.
  • Title IX, Employment, Tax
    Spot provisions that create Title IX, employment-classification, wage-and-hour, or tax-characterization exposure, and build in the drafting obligations each one requires.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 7, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Joshua Frieser, Principal Attorney | Frieser Legal

Joshua Frieser is a sports and business lawyer and the Principal Attorney at Frieser Legal, a boutique sports law practice based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He represents elite athletes, sports agents and agencies, sports industry businesses, and corporate sponsors, with a practice centered on NIL negotiations, licensing, intellectual property, business structuring, and regulatory compliance.

  • Education & Credentials

Josh earned his J.D. from Marquette University Law School in 2021 and holds a B.S. in Kinesiology, with Distinction, from Indiana University Bloomington (2018). He is admitted to practice in Wisconsin.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Josh is recognized as a leading voice on the legal and regulatory landscape of college athletics. He has been quoted by the Associated Press, Front Office Sports, and the Wisconsin State Journal, and he frequently speaks at CLE programs and industry panels on NIL and the business of college sports.

  • Professional Involvement

He serves on the American Arbitration Association’s Sports Advisory Committee and is a member of the Sports Lawyers Association and the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Sports & Entertainment Law Section. His recent presentations include programs for the Federal Bar Association, the American Arbitration Association, Strafford Publications (Barbri), and the State Bar of Wisconsin.

  • Experience

Josh advocates for sports clients in high-stakes settings, from athletics association regulatory proceedings to complex NIL negotiations, helping athletes capitalize on opportunities, maintain eligibility, and protect their brands. Before founding Frieser Legal, he gained experience at the NCAA’s Office of the Committees on Infractions and the National Sports Law Institute, and through judicial internships with judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

 

John Long, Transition Partner | Kutak Rock LLP

John Long has more than a decade of experience representing universities, coaches, and sports organizations in high-profile collegiate and professional sports matters. A member of Kutak Rock’s College Athletics Industry group, he focuses his practice on NCAA infractions and compliance, Title IX gender equity, sports wagering investigations, and name, image, and likeness (NIL) issues.

  • Education & Credentials

John earned his J.D. from Marquette University Law School, where he studied through the National Sports Law Institute, and his B.S. from the University of Texas. He is admitted to practice in Texas.

  • Recognition & Leadership

While practicing at a large labor and employment law firm, John obtained one of the largest appellate victories in the history of NCAA infractions appeals.

  • Professional Involvement

John serves as Chair of the American Bar Association’s Sports and Entertainment Planning Committee and is a member of the American Football Coaches Association.

  • Experience

John has served as lead counsel for numerous Division I institutions in NCAA major infractions matters and has advised conferences and universities on complex compliance and eligibility issues, including landmark waiver cases involving student-athletes at the University of North Carolina and West Virginia University. Before joining Kutak Rock, he was a member of the Collegiate Sports Practice Group at a large full-service law firm, where he represented Division I institutions and conferences on high-profile matters, including the NCAA House Settlement. Earlier in his career, he served as Executive of Athletics Compliance at Southeastern Louisiana University.

 

Kenneth S. Witt_FedBarKen Witt, Partner | Kutak Rock LLP

Ken Witt is an experienced corporate and securities attorney in Kutak Rock’s Scottsdale office. He represents commercial banks and other institutional clients, private investment funds, and companies across industry verticals including AI, quantum computing, and energy, with work spanning institutional investments, mergers and acquisitions, venture-backed companies, and securities regulation.

  • Education & Credentials

Ken is a graduate of Harvard University (A.B., 1980), where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, and Harvard Law School (J.D., 1983). He is admitted to practice in Arizona.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ken serves as Co-Chair of Kutak Rock’s Institutional Investment Group and is rated AV (Preeminent) by Martindale-Hubbell. Called “business friendly” by his clients, he emphasizes quality, value, and results.

  • Professional Involvement

Ken is a member of the Arizona Bar Association and a frequent CLE presenter, panelist, and author, with speaking engagements for the Arizona Bar Association, Strafford, and Kutak Rock CLE programs, and publications in Law360, Bloomberg Law, and the Denver Law Review.

  • Experience

Ken’s work runs from assisting major commercial banks with SBIC fund investments to M&A transactions and the representation of venture-backed clients developing AI and quantum computing technology. Representative matters include private fund investments for major commercial banks, venture financings for technology and ag-tech companies, public offerings and shelf registrations for energy companies, and private placements for real estate developers.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Representing College Athletes in Revenue Sharing and Third-Party NIL Deals Against PE-Funded and Well-Resourced Counterparties | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session examines the legal landscape an attorney must understand to effectively represent college athletes in NIL negotiations against sophisticated counterparties—PE-backed collectives, public, private, and now commercial university entities, and multimedia rights companies—under the post-House v. NCAA settlement framework. Attendees will learn how to structure contracts that survive Deloitte’s FMV review, identify and neutralize red-flag provisions including overbroad exclusivity, transfer clawbacks, perpetual IP rights, and exploitative agent fee structures, and advise clients on risks arising from an ever-changing regulatory landscape, two Executive Orders, and pending federal legislation. Attorneys will leave with a practical framework for drafting, negotiating, and auditing NIL agreements on behalf of individual athlete clients.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Drafting Athlete Revenue-Share Agreements with Schools Funded by Private Capital | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session addresses key compliance elements related to athlete revenue-share and NIL agreements in the post House v. NCAA settlement era. The settlement permits participating Division I institutions to compensate student-athletes directly, beginning with an approximately $20.5 million institutional cap for the 2025–26 academic year, with the cap increasing over the settlement term. Attendees will learn to identify the key drafting and counseling risks in this emerging market: cap allocation and adjustment, NIL rights grants and activation obligations, interaction with third-party NIL and associated-entity deals, Title IX uncertainty, employment-status and wage-and-hour exposure, tax characterization and reporting, transfer-related restrictions, termination rights, liquidated damages and buyout enforceability, state-law variation, and payment-source risk where schools or conferences use private-capital or commercial-rights structures to fund athletics operations. By the end of the session, attendees will be able to evaluate a revenue-share agreement against the House settlement framework and the CSC compliance regime, spot provisions that may create Title IX, antitrust, employment, tax, state-law, transfer, or enforceability risk, and draft contractual protections that preserve institutional and athlete flexibility while the regulatory framework continues to evolve.

Additionally, this session addresses the college athletics’ potential transition from a donor-based model to an investment model which has been fueled by private capital offerings and the possibility of major college football and basketball transitioning to a private-owned collective bargaining model. The session will address those transition possibilities, including public=private partnership, booster-led private ownership, PE-backed spin-offs, conference credit facilities, and equity proposals— which are reshaping the industry.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, July 9, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy Thu, July 16, 2026
Live Webcast
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, July 22, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, July 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay