Terrell A. Ratliff, Esq. is co-founding managing partner of Ratliff Jackson LLP, with offices in Cherry Hill, NJ and Philadelphia, PA. He concentrates in Title IX, student discipline, and education law, representing students, families, and institutions across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and both federal districts. His practice pairs criminal defense experience, including digital-evidence and mandatory-reporting issues, with school-related litigation, a combination directly suited to student AI-image incidents.
Kyle Anthony Adams is the Pennsylvania Managing Attorney at Ratliff Jackson LLP, where he leads the firm's Pennsylvania practice with a focus on education law, civil litigation, and regulatory matters. He represents students, parents, educators, educational institutions, and businesses throughout Pennsylvania in administrative proceedings, state courts, and federal courts.
Live Video-Broadcast: September 25, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
The district's first fourteen days build the record that decides the lawsuit
Students are using AI tools to generate nude images of classmates, and most districts are unprepared. The TAKE IT DOWN Act and rapidly shifting state legislation have changed what intake requires, while federal Title IX enforcement remains uncertain. The Lancaster Country Day School federal complaint now shows exactly how these incidents become litigation.
The exposure compounds fast. Miss a mandatory child-abuse report and the district creates its own liability. Retain the images as evidence and the district may violate federal CSAM law. Respond slowly and victim families file Title IX, state negligence, and Section 1983 claims under Davis v. Monroe's deliberateindifference standard.
Attendees leave with a jurisdiction-specific checklist for the first two weeks, a 14-day incident-response playbook, and a practical framework for evaluating exposure and positioning the district's response record as its primary defense. Sovereign immunity, superseding cause, Monell doctrine, and contribution claims against AI platform operators complete the defense toolkit.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: September 25, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Terrell A. Ratliff, Esq., Co-Founding Managing Partner | Ratliff Jackson LLP
Terrell A. Ratliff, Esq. is co-founding managing partner of Ratliff Jackson LLP, with offices in Cherry Hill, NJ and Philadelphia, PA. He concentrates in Title IX, student discipline, and education law, representing students, families, and institutions across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and both federal districts. His practice pairs criminal defense experience, including digital-evidence and mandatory-reporting issues, with school-related litigation, a combination directly suited to student AI-image incidents.
Mr. Ratliff earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Toledo College of Law. He is admitted to practice in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, before the U.S. District Courts for the District of New Jersey, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the Eastern District of Michigan, and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mr. Ratliff was recognized by Lawyers of Distinction in 2023, and Ratliff Jackson LLP was named a 2025 Top 10 firm in both criminal defense and education law by the American Association of Attorney Advocates.
He is an active member of the Association of Title IX Administrators (ATIXA), which informs his understanding of how institutional Title IX investigations are designed to be conducted.
Mr. Ratliff’s student defense and license defense work is grounded in over a decade of active criminal defense practice across New Jersey and Pennsylvania state courts and federal courts in the Third Circuit. He represents students and families in Title IX investigations, academic integrity charges, emergency suspensions, expulsion hearings, and code of conduct proceedings nationwide, and he leads the firm’s professional license defense practice, representing physicians, nurses, educators, and other state-licensed practitioners in board investigations and disciplinary proceedings.
Kyle Anthony Adams, Pennsylvania Managing Attorney | Ratliff Jackson LLP
Kyle Anthony Adams is the Pennsylvania Managing Attorney at Ratliff Jackson LLP, where he leads the firm’s Pennsylvania practice with a focus on education law, civil litigation, and regulatory matters. He represents students, parents, educators, educational institutions, and businesses throughout Pennsylvania in administrative proceedings, state courts, and federal courts.
Before entering private practice, Kyle earned his Bachelor of Arts from Seton Hall University and commissioned as an officer in the United States Army Chemical Corps, serving in the New Jersey Army National Guard. He received his Juris Doctor from Mitchell Hamline School of Law. His military background has shaped his disciplined, strategic approach to legal advocacy, leadership, and problem-solving.
Mr. Adams has served as Chairman of a local nonprofit organization and as a member of the Chester County Veterans Advisory Council, reflecting a longstanding commitment to civic leadership.
Beyond the practice of law, Mr. Adams is an active member of the volunteer fire service and serves as a Hazardous Materials Technician with the Chester County HAZMAT Team, supporting emergency response efforts in critical situations.
Kyle’s education law practice encompasses student discipline, special education, disability accommodations, Title IX and civil rights matters, academic integrity proceedings, school governance, administrative appeals, and education-related litigation. He regularly advises families, schools, and educational organizations on navigating complex legal and regulatory issues while developing practical strategies to resolve disputes efficiently and effectively.
In addition to his education law practice, Kyle maintains an active litigation practice representing clients in complex civil and criminal matters. His experience before administrative agencies and trial courts provides a practical perspective on advocacy, due process, evidentiary issues, and litigation strategy that informs his presentations on education law.
SESSION 1 – The First Two Weeks: Advising a District Through a Student AI Nude-Image Incident | 1:00pm – 2:00pm
When a student uses AI to generate nude images of classmates, the district’s first fourteen days decide whether the incident is contained or becomes a federal lawsuit. This session gives district counsel a working playbook for that window: navigating mandatory child-abuse reporting, recognizing what Title IX and the TAKE IT DOWN Act require in the first 24 hours, preserving evidence without unlawfully retaining CSAM, and managing family notification and discipline. Drawing on real incident failures, including Lancaster Country Day School, we show where districts create their own liability, and how counsel prevents it.
BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm
SESSION 2 – Defending Districts Against Deepfake-Harassment Claims by Victim Families | 2:10pm – 3:10pm
When victim families sue, the district’s exposure turns on the record built in the first days of the incident. This session walks defense counsel through the Title IX deliberate-indifference, state negligence, and Section 1983 claims now being filed over student-generated deepfakes, using the Lancaster Country Day School federal complaint as a live template. We examine how Davis v. Monroe applies to AI imagery, the sovereign immunity, superseding-cause, and Monell defenses available to public districts, and how to position the district’s response record as its primary defense.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General