The Fund That Is Only One Deal: Structuring SPVs, Co-Investment Vehicles, and Syndications for Emerging Managers

Alexander J. Davie
Alexander J. Davie | Riggs Davie PLC

Alexander J. Davie is a Co-Founder and Member of Riggs Davie PLC in Brentwood, Tennessee, where his practice centers on private funds, startup and venture capital, corporate and securities, and mergers and acquisitions. He represents managers of private investment funds, including private equity, venture capital, and hedge funds, and structures the vehicles those managers use to invest: private investment partnerships, co-investment vehicles, and the management compensation arrangements that sit behind them.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 6, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A single-asset SPV is still a fund, and every federal regime that reaches a fund reaches it too

Sponsors increasingly raise capital one deal at a time: single-asset SPVs, co-investment vehicles alongside a flagship fund, and series LLCs running dozens of vehicles under one umbrella. The ground has shifted under them. The SEC staff’s March 12, 2025 no-action letter set $200,000 and $1,000,000 minimums that make Rule 506(c) verification workable. The 2025 QSBS amendments changed the math on an SPV versus direct investment. A finder proposal is pending at the SEC.

Choose the wrong entity and the follow-on rights do not work. Count investors wrong across series and integration analysis pulls the vehicles together under Section 3(c)(1). Pay an introducer and you have created an unregistered broker-dealer. Admit plan investors without running ERISA’s 25 percent test and the vehicle trips the plan-asset limits. Run several SPVs and federal and state adviser registration comes into question.

You walk out with a working structure for the next vehicle. It covers the entity choice, the SPV-specific governing document terms, and a single-deal carry, fee, and expense design. It then runs the Rule 506(b) versus 506(c) decision, the Investment Company Act and adviser-status analysis, and the ERISA checkpoints, each tied to a choice the sponsor actually faces.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Entity and Document Design
    Choosing among a standalone LLC, an LP, or a series LLC, and drafting the SPV-specific governing document terms on management rights and rights to follow-on rounds.
  • Single-Deal Economics
    Designing single-deal carry, fees, and expense allocation, and managing the conflicts that arise when the SPV invests alongside the sponsor’s main fund.
  • QSBS Through the SPV
    Passing QSBS treatment through a partnership SPV after the 2025 amendments, and how those amendments bear on the choice between an SPV and direct investment.
  • Regulation D and Broker-Dealer Risk
    Choosing between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) after the SEC staff’s March 12, 2025 no-action letter, and keeping syndicate leads, platforms, and introducers clear of broker-dealer registration through the federal safe harbor and federal and state finder exemptions.
  • Investment Company Act Exemptions
    Applying Section 3(c)(1), Section 3(c)(7), and the qualifying venture capital fund exemption to deal-by-deal vehicles, with integration analysis across multiple vehicles.
  • Adviser Status and ERISA
    Determining federal and state adviser registration and exempt reporting adviser status for multiSPV sponsors, and applying ERISA’s 25 percent test and the venture capital operating company exception to single-asset vehicles.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 6, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Alexander J. Davie, Co-Founder & Member | Riggs Davie PLC

Alexander J. Davie is a Co-Founder and Member of Riggs Davie PLC in Brentwood, Tennessee, where his practice centers on private funds, startup and venture capital, corporate and securities, and mergers and acquisitions. He represents managers of private investment funds, including private equity, venture capital, and hedge funds, and structures the vehicles those managers use to invest: private investment partnerships, co-investment vehicles, and the management compensation arrangements that sit behind them. He also advises investment advisers on regulatory compliance and works with technology companies, from startups to emerging growth companies, on formation, capital raising, and commercial agreements.

  • Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. with high honors from Duke University School of Law in 2003, where he served as Managing Editor of the Duke Law & Technology Review, and holds an M.Ed. in Organizational Leadership from Vanderbilt University (2008) and a B.A. in Economics, magna cum laude, from the University of Pennsylvania (2000). He is admitted to practice in Tennessee and Pennsylvania.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He has been selected to Super Lawyers in Securities & Corporate Finance each year from 2019 through 2025. He is a co-founder and member of Riggs Davie PLC, where his practice areas are private funds, startup and venture capital, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate and securities.

  • Professional Involvement

He writes on private fund regulation; his published work includes “The Different Meanings of the Word ‘Registration’ for Private Funds” (January 31, 2019).

  • Experience

His fund work spans the formation documents for hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, and real estate partnerships, together with co-investment vehicles and management compensation structures. Representative fund matters include the formation of a technology-focused venture capital fund and its $25 million offering, the formation of the fund manager for a $100 million-plus syndication fund that provided a credit facility to a FinTech startup, and the formation of the fund manager for a $200 million-plus evergreen private credit fund. On the company side, he assists technology entrepreneurs with entity formation, seed, convertible note, and angel financings, and vendor and customer agreements, and has handled the sale of a software company at a $25 million valuation, an automotive technology company at $10 million, a healthcare technology company at $8 million, and the acquisition of a real estate development firm at $21 million.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Building the Vehicle: Entity Choice, SPV Structuring, and Economic Terms | Alexander J.

Davie | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session covers entity choice among a standalone LLC, an LP, or a series LLC, and SPV-specific governing document terms, including management rights and rights to follow-on rounds. It then turns to economic terms: single-deal carry, fees, and expense allocation, conflicts when the SPV invests alongside the sponsor’s main fund, and the effect of the 2025 QSBS amendments on the choice between an SPV and direct investment.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Regulatory Matters: Regulation D, Broker-Dealer Risk, the Investment Company Act, the Investment Advisers Act, and ERISA | Alexander J. Davie | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session covers the Rule 506(b) and 506(c) choice after the SEC staff’s March 12, 2025 no-action letter, including when its $200,000 and $1,000,000 minimums make it workable; broker-dealer risk for syndicate leads, platforms, and introducers, state finder exemptions, and the SEC’s pending finder proposal; exemptions under the Investment Company Act such as Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7), and qualifying venture capital fund exemptions; federal and state adviser registration and exempt reporting adviser status for sponsors running multiple SPVs; and ERISA plan-asset limits for single-asset vehicles.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses Tue, October 20, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Fri, October 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay