The Overlay Trap in U.S. Website Accessibility Litigation

Ashley S. Jenkins
Ashley S. Jenkins
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Ashley S. Jenkins is an Associate in Seyfarth's Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm's ADA Title III & Public Access team, where her practice focuses on advising and defending clients facing accessibility-related challenges under federal, state, and local nondiscrimination laws. She regularly represents businesses in litigation involving both physical and digital accessibility matters, as well as in federal and state government investigations, including matters brought by the United States Department of Justice.

Ken Nakata
Ken Nakata
Converge Accessibility

Ken Nakata is a Principal at Converge Accessibility, where he combines legal and technical perspectives on digital accessibility for a commonsense approach to compliance and lower risk.

Live Video-Broadcast: June 18, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Defend website accessibility cases where automated overlay tools made things worse — apply standing, mootness, and res judicata doctrine, and respond to the FTC's accessiBe consent order in civil litigation.

What Will You Learn

Learn how accessibility overlay widgets are framed in ADA Title III website litigation, how the FTC accessiBe consent order is being used in civil cases, and the doctrinal framework courts are applying.

What Will You Gain

Gain practical command of standing, mootness, and res judicata doctrine in accessibility cases, defense strategy against "we use an overlay" claims, and exposure management across ADA and state law claims.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Vendor promises
    Compare overlay marketing claims against courtroom reality.
  • FTC consent order
    Analyze how the FTC's April 2025 accessiBe consent order affects ADA litigation.
  • Standing doctrine
    Apply Calcano standing analysis to serial plaintiffs.
  • Mootness analysis
    Apply Haynes v. Hooters mootness in accessibility cases.
  • Res judicata
    Apply Dolce & Gabbana res judicata in class action follow-ons.
  • Screen reader claims
    Defend functional access theories under ADA Title III.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: June 18, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Ashley S. Jenkins, Associate | Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Ashley S. Jenkins is an Associate in Seyfarth’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s ADA Title III & Public Access team, where her practice focuses on advising and defending clients facing accessibility-related challenges under federal, state, and local nondiscrimination laws. She regularly represents businesses in litigation involving both physical and digital accessibility matters, as well as in federal and state government investigations, including matters brought by the United States Department of Justice. Her experience includes defending retailers, hotels, restaurants, technology companies, institutions of higher education, health care providers, housing providers, and public entities in single-plaintiff and class action litigation arising under Title III of the ADA and parallel state statutes.

  • Education & Credentials

Ashley earned her J.D. from the University of Buffalo School of Law and her B.S. from Gannon University, where she received the Academic Excellence Award, the Business Excellence Award, and participated in the University Honors Program. She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ashley is a member of Seyfarth’s National ADA Title III Specialty Practice Team, where her entire practice is devoted to assisting clients defending Title III lawsuits and federal investigations.

  • Professional Involvement

Ashley counsels clients on proactive accessibility compliance strategies, including the development of ADA compliance programs, accessibility policies, and training initiatives designed to minimize legal risk and strengthen operational practices. She also advises housing providers on compliance with the Fair Housing Act and regularly assists clients responding to government investigations and enforcement actions. She has co-authored Seyfarth’s ADA Title III News & Insights blog on topics including federal website accessibility, kiosk class actions, and stadium seating modifications, and has presented at the CSUN Assistive Technology Conference on “Digital Accessibility Law: A Legal Update and Hot Topics” (March 2025).

  • Experience

Prior to joining Seyfarth, Ashley served in the Disability Rights Section of the U.S. Department of Justice, where she enforced the same laws she now helps clients navigate, providing her with a unique perspective on compliance and enforcement matters. She also assisted in the Deepwater Horizon multidistrict litigation while working in the Civil Division of the Department of Justice.

 

Ken Nakata, Principal | Converge Accessibility

Ken Nakata is a Principal at Converge Accessibility, where he combines legal and technical perspectives on digital accessibility for a commonsense approach to compliance and lower risk. He is a former Senior Trial Attorney with the U.S. Justice Department’s Disability Rights Section, where he developed nationwide ADA policies for the internet, served as lead counsel for the interagency working group making the federal government’s information technology accessible to people with disabilities under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, and represented the United States many times in litigation in federal courts.

  • Education & Credentials

Ken is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and received his undergraduate degree in mathematics from Johns Hopkins University. He is admitted to the Bars of New York, Washington, and the District of Columbia. He is certified as a Privacy Professional with the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), a Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Principles (CPACP) with the International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP), and a Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ken received the Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in Information Technology from Attorney General Janet Reno. He is a Founding and former Board Member of the International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP) and currently serves on the IAAP’s Certification Committee.

  • Professional Involvement

Ken is a frequent lecturer sought after by major international accessibility conferences for his knowledge of both law and technology. He has trained teams on proper HTML coding for accessibility and has led continuing legal education courses for attorneys on legal defenses in web accessibility cases under the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Act.

  • Experience

Ken’s career has spanned both federal government enforcement and private-sector accessibility practice. At the U.S. Department of Justice’s Disability Rights Section, he developed nationwide ADA policies for the internet and represented the United States in federal court litigation. He now combines that legal background with deep technical expertise to advise organizations on digital accessibility, regulatory compliance, and risk management at Converge Accessibility.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The Overlay Trap: How Accessibility Widgets Backfire | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

Cover the full overlay story — vendor promises, plaintiff firm targeting, the FTC’s April 2025 accessiBe consent order, and Parikh v. accessiBe — alongside standing under Calcano, mootness under Haynes v. Hooters, and res judicata under Dolce & Gabbana.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – ADA Title III Defense Strategy in Overlay Cases | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

Examine ADA Title III website accessibility litigation involving overlay tools from a defense perspective, including how claims are pleaded, how courts evaluate automated accessibility tools, screen reader access theories, and litigation response strategies informed by TransUnion v. Ramirez.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, June 4, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Fri, June 5, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Wed, June 10, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Professionalism and Civility (2026 Edition)
Professionalism and Civility (2026 Edition) Fri, June 19, 2026
Live Webcast
The AI Chatbot Wiretap Class Action Wave
The AI Chatbot Wiretap Class Action Wave Fri, June 26, 2026
Live Webcast