When the Client Trained a Model on Someone Else’s Data, Copyright Exposure and Compliance

Warrington Parker
Warrington Parker | Crowell & Moring LLP

Warrington Parker is the managing partner of Crowell & Moring's San Francisco office, an experienced first-chair trial lawyer, and a former federal prosecutor. He has tried more than 20 cases to verdict across a wide range of civil and criminal matters, including copyright, trade secret, securities fraud, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, product liability, and breach of contract disputes.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 25, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Fair Use Fight Was Only Half the Battle

Three 2025 federal district court rulings, Ross, Bartz, and Kadrey, now define the fair use landscape for LLM training data. California's AB 2013 and the EU AI Act's GPAI rules now impose disclosure duties on that same conduct. Litigation exposure and compliance exposure arrive together.

Train on pirated data and the defense position weakens under fair use. Ignore AB 2013's 12 mandatory disclosure categories and enforcement risk follows, even while xAI v. Bonta sits on appeal. Skip the EU AI Act's TDM opt-out mechanism and GPAI documentation duties still attach. The $1.5 billion Bartz settlement shows the litigation price of guessing wrong. Scraping-based state law claims and DMCA § 1202 CMI claims follow, and § 301 preemption does not always stop them.

Attendees leave with practitioner work product. A structured defense framework for copyright and state law scraping claims. A minimum viable due diligence framework for companies subject to AB 2013, the EU AI Act, and potential GDPR exposure. And the provisions to negotiate into training data licensing agreements so clients are protected from downstream copyright liability. This is judgment and drafting, not a doctrine recital.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Fair Use Trifecta
    How Ross, Bartz, and Kadrey reshape the fair use defense for training data.
  • Provenance and Substitution
    Evaluating exposure through data provenance, market substitution evidence, and the transformativeness analysis.
  • DMCA § 1202 Claims
    Early motion practice and standing defects that defeat CMI claims.
  • Scraping Claim Preemption
    Where 17 U.S.C. § 301 defeats scraping-based state claims and where it fails.
  • New Disclosure Obligations
    California AB 2013 and EU AI Act GPAI duties, with the xAI challenge.
  • Licensing and Diligence
    Structuring training data licenses and building the minimum viable due diligence framework.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 25, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Warrington Parker, Managing Partner | Crowell & Moring LLP

Warrington Parker is the managing partner of Crowell & Moring’s San Francisco office, an experienced first-chair trial lawyer, and a former federal prosecutor. He has tried more than 20 cases to verdict across a wide range of civil and criminal matters, including copyright, trade secret, securities fraud, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, product liability, and breach of contract disputes. He is a member of the firm’s Litigation, White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement, and Investigations groups.

  • Education & Credentials

Warrington earned his bachelor’s degree from Princeton University and his law degree from Harvard Law School, where he served as an editor of the Harvard Law Review. Following law school, he clerked for the Honorable Cecil F. Poole of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from 1989 to 1990. He is admitted to practice in California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

The Daily Journal named Warrington a Top Artificial Intelligence Lawyer in California in 2024, recognizing his significant contributions to artificial intelligence law. As managing partner, he leads Crowell & Moring’s San Francisco office and is recognized for his strategic approach to complex litigation.

  • Professional Involvement

The Bar Association of San Francisco appointed Warrington to the Board of Directors of its Justice & Diversity Center, effective January 1, 2026. He has also served as co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Criminal Litigation Committee.

  • Experience

Warrington previously served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. In private practice, he represents clients in False Claims Act matters, commercial and technology litigation, and disputes involving claimed violations of state and federal statutes and regulations. He has conducted criminal and civil internal investigations for companies and boards of directors in the United States and abroad, including FCPA and financial irregularity investigations in China, Japan, and India. His clients have included eBay, Instacart, and StubHub.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Defending Copyright and Scraping Claims Over AI Training Data | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session examines the defense of copyright infringement and data-scraping claims arising from AI model training, focusing on the three landmark 2025 federal district court rulings that now define the fair use landscape for LLM training data. Attorneys will learn how to evaluate client exposure based on data provenance, market substitution evidence, and output containment, and how to deploy preemption, early motion practice, and settlement benchmarks in active litigation. Participants will leave with a structured defense framework applicable to both copyright and state-law scraping claims.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Training Data Diligence, Licensing, and California’s New Disclosure Law | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session covers the compliance and transactional obligations attorneys must understand when a client trains or deploys a generative AI model using third-party data. Attendees will examine California’s AB 2013 Training Data Transparency Act — its 12 mandatory disclosure categories, retroactive scope, and early compliance patterns — alongside the EU AI Act’s parallel GPAI training data obligations. The session also addresses practical training data due diligence frameworks, the structure of content licensing deals, and how the emerging licensing market intersects with fair use defenses in ongoing litigation.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, August 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay