David C. Carr is an ethics lawyer whose practice is State Bar discipline defense, legal ethics advice, attorney licensing, and ethics expert testimony. He spent twelve years at the State Bar of California as a staff attorney, Deputy Trial Counsel, and Assistant Chief Trial Counsel before moving to the defense side of the discipline system he once worked within.
Live Video-Broadcast: November 19, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
A hallucinated citation now travels from the courtroom to the State Bar
Courts have stopped treating AI-generated citations as research errors. California’s new Code of Civil Procedure §128.7(d)(2)(A), effective January 1, 2027, bars filing any citation the responsible attorney has not personally verified. New Business & Professions Code §6068.1 requires lawyers to verify generative AI output and disclose its use to the court.
Sign a brief with hallucinated citations and Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 sanctions follow. Draw a $1,000 sanction in California and the court must report you to the State Bar. In Noland v. Land of the Free (2025), a $10,000 sanction became a State Bar prosecution and a stayed suspension. Follow a partner’s instruction and Rule 5.2 offers no Nuremberg defense unless the question was arguable. Bill the hours AI saved you and ABA Formal Opinion 512 says you billed time you did not spend.
You leave with a practitioner’s checklist: what to verify before you sign, when Rule 5.2 protects you, and how a sanctions order reaches your bar. You also learn to write time entries that state their basis, communicate under Rule 1.4, and respond when a billing dispute arrives.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: November 19, 2026
Closed-captioning available
David C. Carr, Ethics Lawyer | Law Office of David C. Carr
David C. Carr is an ethics lawyer whose practice is State Bar discipline defense, legal ethics advice, attorney licensing, and ethics expert testimony. He spent twelve years at the State Bar of California as a staff attorney, Deputy Trial Counsel, and Assistant Chief Trial Counsel before moving to the defense side of the discipline system he once worked within.
He earned his J.D. from Loyola Law School Los Angeles in 1986 and a B.A. in History from UCLA in 1977. He was admitted to the State Bar of California in 1986, the State Bar of Texas in 2022, and the State Bar of New Mexico in 2023, and is admitted to the U.S. District Courts for the Central (1986), Southern (2002), and Northern (2004) Districts of California.
He holds an AV Preeminent peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell, the highest rating for legal ability and ethical standards awarded by fellow attorneys. He served as President of the Association of Discipline Defense Counsel from 2008 to 2011, and from 2018 to 2021 sat on COPRAC, the State Bar of California’s Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, the body that issues California’s formal ethics opinions. He has published more than twenty articles on legal ethics in the San Diego Daily Transcript, the Los Angeles Daily Journal, and San Diego County Bar Association publications, and has delivered more than twenty presentations to bar and professional groups on topics including client trust accounts, fee agreements, and technology in law practice. He also writes two long-running commentaries on California attorney discipline, the Kafkaesq blog and California Legal Ethics.
He is a member of the Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers and the ABA Center for Professional Responsibility and has served on the San Diego County Bar Association Legal Ethics Committee since 2002. He was an adjunct professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law from 2017 to 2021.
He began his career as a business and commercial litigator before joining the State Bar of California in 1989, where he spent twelve years as a staff attorney (1989), Deputy Trial Counsel (1992–1999), and Assistant Chief Trial Counsel and Manager in the discipline enforcement office (1999–2001), prosecuting and supervising attorney discipline cases. In 2001 he established the Law Office of David C. Carr, a practice devoted exclusively to legal ethics and State Bar matters and has since represented hundreds of California attorneys and bar applicants. He defends lawyers at every stage of the disciplinary process, from the initial State Bar inquiry through investigation and formal proceedings before the State Bar Court of California and the California Supreme Court and represents applicants in moral character and reinstatement matters before the Committee of Bar Examiners.
SESSION 1 – Verification, Supervision, and How a Sanctions Order Becomes Bar Discipline | 2:30pm – 3:30pm
This session examines the personal filing obligations every new associate assumes the moment they sign a pleading, motion, or paper under FRCP Rule 11(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1927, with particular focus on the AI-hallucination cases reshaping sanctions law in 2024–2025. Attorneys will learn how the supervisory framework under Model Rules 5.1 and 5.2 allocates responsibility between associates and supervising partners — and where the ‘I followed orders’ defense fails. The session closes by tracing the referral pipeline from a sanctions order to state bar discipline, including reciprocal discipline across jurisdictions, so new associates understand the full professional-life consequences of a single deficient filing.
BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm
SESSION 2 – Client Communication and Billing Judgment: From the First Time Entry Through the Fee Dispute | 3:40pm – 4:40pm
This session teaches new associates the ethical framework governing client communication and legal billing from the moment they record their first time entry through the resolution of a fee dispute. Attorneys will learn how Model Rules 1.4, 1.5, and 1.15 apply to everyday billing decisions, which trigger grievances, how ABA Formal Opinion 512 (2024) changes the calculus for AI-assisted work, and how fee disputes escalate into discipline. Attendees leave with concrete practices for writing time entries, structuring client communications, and responding to billing complaints within firm procedures.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Professional Responsibility/Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 Enhanced Ethics
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Ethics Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2 Professional Fitness and Integrity
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2 Professional Responsibility
Approved for CLE Credits
120 Ethics / Professionalism minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Professional Conduct
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Dual
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism
Not Eligible
2 Ethics / Professionalism Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Ethics Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 Ethics / Professionalism
Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism