Surface Use Agreements and Pipeline Easements: Securing Plugging, Removal, and Restoration Costs Through Assignment and Bankruptcy

Lisa Rothberg
Lisa Rothberg
Dore Rothberg Law, P.C.

Lisa Rothberg is a Shareholder of Dore Rothberg Law, P.C. in Houston, where she serves as Liens & Transactions Director and Bankruptcy Director and leads the firm's transactional section.

Kyle Tisdel
Kyle Tisdel
Western Environmental Law Center

Kyle Tisdel has worked at the Western Environmental Law Center since 2011, serving as a senior attorney and the director of its Climate & Energy Program from Taos, New Mexico.

Live Video-Broadcast: January 19, 2027

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Restoration Promise Is Only as Good as the Security Behind It

Oil and gas surface use agreements and gathering-line easements promise restoration, plugging, and removal at the end of a well's life. The midstream rejection cases, from Sabine to Hilltop SPV, show how those promises become unsecured claims when an operator or a thinly capitalized assignee files for bankruptcy. Meanwhile, federal bonding minimums cover only a fraction of real plugging and reclamation costs.

Leave the restoration end state vague, and the duty looks personal rather than running with the land. Let the assignor walk away at transfer, and the obligation follows the asset to an undercapitalized buyer. Hold security inside the operator's estate, and it disappears in bankruptcy. Ignore the bonding rulemakings and transfer proceedings, and the orphaned-well inventory keeps growing.

Attendees walk out with a clause-by-clause redline showing opening and fallback positions for landowners and operators, a checklist for surviving assignment and insolvency, and a framework for measuring the assurance gap behind any operator. It is practitioner judgment from a board-certified oil and gas transactional lawyer and a public-interest litigator who has challenged federal oil and gas decisions.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Rejection Under Section 365
    How Sabine, Alta Mesa, Extraction, and Hilltop SPV turn surface promises into unsecured claims, and which covenants survive.
  • Restoration and Plug-and-Reclaim Clauses
    How measurable end states and inactivity triggers keep restoration duties running with the land after Zimmerview.
  • Assignment and Security
    How assignor liability, successor screens, and letters of credit keep security outside the operator's estate.
  • The Federal Bonding Floor
    What BLM's 2024 bonding rule required, what the 2026 proposed rescission would leave, and the per-well shortfall.
     New Mexico's 2026 Reform
    How single-well assurance, inactive and marginal well rules, and transfer screens reshape operator obligations.
  • Levers for Counsel
    How rulemaking interventions, transfer challenges, and inactive-well enforcement close the gap contracts cannot.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: January 19, 2027

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Lisa Rothberg, Shareholder | Dore Rothberg Law, P.C.

Lisa Rothberg is a Shareholder of Dore Rothberg Law, P.C. in Houston, where she serves as Liens & Transactions Director and Bankruptcy Director and leads the firm’s transactional section. She began her legal career as an oil and gas title attorney and now focuses on complex commercial business transactions in the energy, construction, and real estate industries, with a specialty in perfecting security interests in oil, gas, and alternative energy properties. She is especially well suited to this program: years of drafting and negotiating oil and gas leases, assignments, and easements, substantial experience in energy-industry business bankruptcies, including priority disputes for creditors and unsecured creditor committees, and Board Certification in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, bringing the perspective of a transactional lawyer who knows how surface promises fare when an operator fails.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Rothberg earned her J.D. from South Texas College of Law in 2010 and her B.S., magna cum laude, from Texas A&M University in 2006. She is admitted in Texas and before the U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Northern, and Western Districts of Texas, and she is Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Rothberg holds three leadership roles at her firm, serving as Shareholder, Liens & Transactions Director, and Bankruptcy Director, and she leads the firm’s transactional section. Her Board Certification in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law places her among the Texas attorneys recognized for specialized expertise in the field.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Rothberg is a member of the State Bar of Texas Oil, Gas & Energy Resources Law Section, the Moller-Foltz Inn of Court, the Texas Aggie Bar Association, and the Aggie Women Network. She also volunteers with the Joan and Stanford Alexander Jewish Family Service.

  • Experience

Ms. Rothberg’s practice involves the analysis, preparation, and perfection of security interests in real and personal property, and she files lien claims for contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers throughout the country, navigating state-by-state procedural nuances and complex lien priority and waiver issues. Her energy practice includes drafting, reviewing, and negotiating documents for property owners, oilfield service companies, drilling contractors, and E&P companies, including oil and gas leases and assignments, purchase and sale agreements, joint operating agreements, farmouts, master service agreements, drilling contracts, and title opinions. She also handles real estate matters such as title and escrow, deeds, leases, boundary disputes, easements, and wrongful liens, and has substantial experience analyzing priority disputes in energy-industry bankruptcies.

 

Kyle Tisdel, Senior Attorney | Western Environmental Law Center

Kyle Tisdel has worked at the Western Environmental Law Center since 2011, serving as a senior attorney and the director of its Climate & Energy Program from Taos, New Mexico. His work centers on the nexus of public lands and fossil fuel development, with the aim of aligning federal decision-making with the demands of climate science, bringing a managed end to fossil fuel exploitation, and ensuring a just transition for Indigenous and frontline communities. He is especially well suited to this program: he has prevailed in dozens of federal cases challenging oil and gas leasing and drilling decisions, he frequently engages state and federal governments on oil and gas policy, and he has spoken publicly about the industry’s failure to save for the retirement of its wells, bringing the perspective of a public-interest litigator focused on who bears the costs operators leave behind.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Tisdel earned his law degree from Vermont Law School, where he was editor-in-chief of the Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, and his B.A. in international relations from Michigan State University.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Tisdel leads the Western Environmental Law Center’s Climate & Energy Program, which he has directed since joining the organization as a staff attorney in 2011. His litigation has set new precedent on the federal government’s obligation to consider the cumulative impacts of climate change and the harms to people and communities in its fossil fuel decisions.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Tisdel frequently engages state and federal governments on climate and environmental justice policy and has discussed New Mexico oil and gas legislation on New Mexico PBS. He has been interviewed by MIT Climate on environmental justice in the American West and has spoken on panels including Gonzaga University’s program on solving the climate crisis while protecting wild spaces.

  • Experience

Mr. Tisdel has prevailed in dozens of cases in federal court. His suite of lawsuits over oil and gas leasing led the federal government to review and reconsider decisions to sell nearly four million acres of public lands, and he represented Diné and conservation groups in Greater Chaco litigation in which a federal appeals court rejected drilling and fracking approvals in northwest New Mexico. He has also challenged Bureau of Land Management approvals of hundreds of oil and gas permits for failing to consider cumulative impacts on people and the environment.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Drafting Surface Use and Pipeline Easement Terms That Survive Assignment and Operator Bankruptcy | Lisa Rothberg | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session walks through the restoration, plug-and-reclaim, pipeline-abandonment, assignment, and security clauses in oil and gas surface use agreements and gathering-line easements, from both the landowner and the operator side. Attorneys will learn why the midstream rejection cases leave surface promises exposed when an operator or a thinly capitalized assignee files for bankruptcy, which duties can be written into the granting instrument as covenants running with the land, how to define a measurable restoration end state and reclamation triggers, and how to keep security outside the operator’s estate. Attendees will leave with a clause-by-clause redline showing opening and fallback positions for each side and a checklist for surviving assignment and insolvency.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – The Financial Assurance Gap: Bonding Reform, Orphaned Wells, and Who Pays When the Operator Walks | Kyle Tisdel | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session examines the regulatory architecture that is supposed to guarantee plugging, removal, and reclamation — and why, for most wells, it does not. Attorneys will learn what federal bonding minimums actually cover and what the proposed rescission of the 2024 BLM rule would leave behind; how New Mexico’s 2026 bonding and cleanup reform — now among the strongest in the nation — reshaped single-well assurance, inactive and marginal well obligations, and operator transfer screens; how aging assets migrate to thinly capitalized operators and shed their cleanup obligations in bankruptcy, feeding the orphaned-well inventory; and the levers counsel for landowners, communities, and states can pull — in rulemakings, transfer proceedings, and enforcement — to close the gap the contract alone cannot. Attendees will leave with a framework for measuring the assurance gap behind any operator and pairing regulatory leverage with the private security covered in Session 1.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Thu, November 19, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal Fri, November 20, 2026
Live Webcast