A Guide to Prosecuting a Civil Appeal: When to Appeal, What to Raise, and How to Win

Julia Williams
Julia Williams
The Clinton Law Firm, LLC

Julia Williams is a dedicated attorney whose broad litigation experience has resulted in successful outcomes for clients, allowing businesses to maintain their relationships and protect owners and shareholders. In her role with the Clinton Law Firm, she has represented clients before the Illinois Appellate Court and argued before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
The Clinton Law Firm, LLC

Ed Clinton, Jr. is a principal in the Clinton Law Firm and focuses his practice on business litigation and legal malpractice. Ed has substantial experience in commercial litigation, including breach of contract, business torts, uniform commercial code, and creditors’ rights. He also has substantial experience in the formation of business entities and the negotiating and drafting of the accompanying documents, including shareholder agreements, partnership agreements and operating agreements.

Live Video-Broadcast: February 26, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

This practical, skill-focused CLE walks litigators through the critical decisions and courtroom mechanics of prosecuting a civil appeal. Attendees will learn when and how to appeal, how to preserve and frame issues for the appellate court, and tactical ways to improve a client’s odds even when the statistical chance of reversal is low. The program emphasizes real-world strategy interlocutory vs. final-judgment appeals, record-building, waiver/forfeiture traps, standards of review, drafting a persuasive statement of facts, and when to bring appellate counsel on board.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • General principles
  • What kind of appeal
  • Strategic considerations: When should you be considering how to structure an appeal?
  • Standard of review
  • Waiver and forfeiture principles
  • How many issues to include?
  • Explain things in a painstaking way
  • The statement of facts
  • Should you involve appellate counsel?
  • Jurisdictional questions: When is the judgment final? Sometimes it’s not clear

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: February 26, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Julia Williams | The Clinton Law Firm, LLC

Julia Williams is a dedicated attorney whose broad litigation experience has resulted in successful outcomes for clients, allowing businesses to maintain their relationships and protect owners and shareholders. In her role with the Clinton Law Firm, she has represented clients before the Illinois Appellate Court and argued before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Julia Williams currently focuses on counseling businesses, professional associations, and not-for-profit organizations providing advice on all aspects of general operations and corporate governance, including bylaws, operating agreements, and other organizational records, intellectual property, contacts, general liability, fiduciary duties and related conflicts and ethical matters, certification and credentialing, and related matters.

Julia is an active member of the Chicago legal community and not-for-profit sector, serving as a representative of the Illinois Bar Association General Assembly and a Director for SheIs, a charity promoting women and girls in sport. Julia has previously served on the board of directors for the Women’s Bar Association of Illinois and chair of the Chicago Bar Association Public Outreach Committee, Serving Our Seniors initiative.

Julia is a 2008 graduate of the University of Maine School of Law, earning a Juris Doctorate. She graduated from Augustana College with a Bachelor’s of Arts degree in 2003. Julia has been recognized as a ‘SuperLawyer’ and ‘Rising Star” by Illinois SuperLawyers Magazine.

Julia was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 2008 and is also admitted to practice in the United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States District Courts for the Northern District of Illinois and Central District of Illinois.

 

Edward X. Clinton, Jr. | The Clinton Law Firm, LLC

Ed Clinton, Jr. is a principal in the Clinton Law Firm and focuses his practice on business litigation and legal malpractice. In 1991, Ed graduated, cum laude, from Harvard Law School. He was a law clerk to the Honorable Michael S. Kanne of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from September 1991 to September 1992. From 1992 to May 1996, he worked as a commercial litigation associate at Mayer, Brown & Platt. After working at Katten Muchin & Zavis, Ed joined the Clinton Law Firm in 1997 as a shareholder.

Ed has substantial experience in commercial litigation, including breach of contract, business torts, uniform commercial code, and creditors’ rights. He also has substantial experience in the formation of business entities and the negotiating and drafting of the accompanying documents, including shareholder agreements, partnership agreements and operating agreements.

Ed also has experience in representing both plaintiffs and defendants in all manner of legal malpractice claims, including claims arising out of litigation, including personal injury cases and divorce cases, failed corporate transactions, and disputed wills and trusts. Ed Clinton, Jr. also represents lawyers before the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.

In addition to his extensive litigation practice, Edward X. Clinton, Jr. serves as an expert witness in legal malpractice claims. He has written extensively on the subjects of securities regulation, consumer fraud and trial practice. His clients include doctors, lawyers, computer software companies, shareholders and corporations.

Agenda

I. General principles | 1:00pm – 1:12pm

  • Appeals can be extremely important
  • While your rate of success may be less than 50%, a successful appeal can make a huge difference to a client

II. What kind of appeal | 1:12pm – 1:24pm

  • Appeals after a final judgment
  • Interlocutory appeals: Appeals while a case is pending

III. Strategic considerations: When should you be considering how to structure an appeal? | 1:24pm – 1:36pm

  • Civil litigation: There is an important issue that you think the trial court missed or misunderstood
    • Can we do an interlocutory appeal?
    • Do we wait until the case has reached judgment?
  • Do we have a clear record to appeal on?
    • Did we preserve the issue?

IV. Standard of review | 1:36pm – 1:48pm

  • What is the standard of review?
  • Tip: Not set in stone. Sometimes you can make the issue more favorable to you

V. Waiver and forfeiture principles | 1:48pm – 2:10pm

  • Extremely important and you should be considering them at every stage of the proceedings
  • Tips and best practices

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

  • Waiver is usually construed against the Appellant, not the Appellee
  • The post-trial motion
  • Caveat: Motions to reconsider?
  • Plain error

VI. How many issues to include? | 2:10pm – 2:22pm

  • Less is more

VII. Explain things in a painstaking way | 2:22pm – 2:34pm

  • The Appellate panel is not familiar with your case in the way you are or the trial judge was
  • Explain things very carefully

VIII. The statement of facts | 2:34pm – 2:46pm

  • Be comprehensive and use chronological order
  • A bad statement of facts will end your appeal early

IX. Should you involve appellate counsel? | 2:46pm – 2:58pm

  • If so, when?

X. Jurisdictional questions: When is the judgment final? Sometimes it’s not clear | 2:58pm – 3:10pm

  • Remedy: Two appeals is better than one

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via Attorney Submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Mon, February 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition)
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition) Wed, February 25, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86
Security Clearances: Completing the Standard Form 86 Wed, February 25, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Fri, February 27, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
How to Launch a Token
How to Launch a Token Tue, March 3, 2026
Live Webcast