Concussion Litigation: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Brain Injuries

Michael Flomenhaft
Michael Flomenhaft
The Flomenhaft Law Firm

Michael Flomenhaft is a graduate of Boston University School of Law and the Trial Lawyers College. He also received his master’s degree in British and American Literature from Hofstra University. The vast majority of his practice involves trying cases for victims of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and severe chronic pain.

Bruce H. Stern
Bruce H. Stern
Stark & Stark, PC

Bruce H. Stern is an expert Civil Trial Attorney as certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. He is also a member of the firm’s Accident & Personal Injury practice. Mr. Stern specializes his practice in representing the victims of traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries and wrongful death.

Live Video-Broadcast: December 19, 2025

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – The Hidden Severity of Concussions: Uncovering their Lasting Impact in Litigation – Michael Flomenhaft

Although all concussions are classified as traumatic brain injuries, their outcomes vary widely. While many individuals recover fully, a significant number experience symptoms that persist and evolve into profound, life changing conditions. In this session, attorney Michael Flomenhaft will delve into the complex reality behind so called “mild” TBIs—exploring why some concussions result in permanent cognitive, emotional, and functional impairments.

Drawing from both scientific research and litigation experience, Mr. Flomenhaft will examine the subtle indicators of lasting brain injury, the limitations and misinterpretations of conventional imaging, and the importance of thorough assessments in identifying and proving the full extent of harm. He will also discuss how defense challenges commonly arise in these cases and provide insights into how to effectively respond to them in the courtroom.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What makes a concussion potentially life changing
  • Pitfalls and insights regarding brain imaging
  • Life changes to be alerted to indicate a more persistent and disabling traumatic brain injury
  • The types of assessments that are important in proving this injury
  • The various defense challenges to proving this case

Session II – Litigating Complex Concussion Claims: Leveraging Neuro-Evidence for Maximum Recovery – Bruce H. Stern

This session explores advanced strategies for litigating concussion and mild traumatic brain injury cases, where objective proof and causation often present significant hurdles. Attendees will learn how to effectively collaborate with neurologists, neuropsychologists, and forensic experts to build credible, evidence-based claims.

The session will cover methods for quantifying and presenting long-term damages—including vocational impairment and loss of quality of life—and discuss persuasive trial themes and demonstrative tools to educate juries on the complexities of brain injury science. Additionally, the session will address how to overcome causation challenges by linking biomechanical forces to clinical outcomes for maximum recovery.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Effective collaboration with neurologists, neuropsychologists and forensic experts
  • Quantifying and presenting long-term damages including vocational and quality-of-life loss
  • Persuasive trial themes and demonstrative tools for educating juries on brain injury science
  • Causation challenges: Bridging the gap between biomechanical forces and clinical presentation

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 19, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Michael Flomenhaft | The Flomenhaft Law Firm

Michael Flomenhaft is a graduate of Boston University School of Law and the Trial Lawyers College. He also received his master’s degree in British and American Literature from Hofstra University. The vast majority of his practice involves trying cases for victims of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and severe chronic pain. He has tried traumatic brain injury and chronic pain cases throughout the United States. His chronic pain cases frequently involve Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)/Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) or other traumatically caused changes in the nervous system producing agonizing, unrelenting pain and potentially adverse brain consequences.

He is renowned for his vast knowledge of neurosciences encompassing neuroimaging, neuropsychology, neurobiology and the neuroanatomy of brain trauma and chronic pain and trial skills related to these subjects. He is also distinguished for his knowledge in spinal neurology, the psychologically fragmenting consequences of trauma including Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD), and the evidentiary challenges entailed in the courtroom presentation of these claims.

Many of Mr. Flomenhaft’s major awards have been for clients whose brain injury was either unrecognized or initially medically minimized. These awards include cases in which there has often been no loss of consciousness, no emergency room diagnosis of brain injury, and no prior imaging proof that brain trauma has occurred. In addition to having tried brain injury and chronic pain cases throughout the United States, he is frequently retained by New York attorneys to take over trial of their brain injury or severe chronic pain cases already in progress.

Mr. Flomenhaft has won landmark evidentiary rulings from New York state courts establishing the scientific validity of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), which shows white matter/axonal brain damage not infrequently seen in victims of motor vehicle whiplash and construction accidents, Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG), which can profile deterioration in the brain’s electrical activity following traumatic brain injury, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), showing brain changes demonstrating severe pain. Additionally, he is the first New York lawyer to put into evidence: diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative MRI analysis showing brain atrophy, electrical evidence of sleep disturbance as a consequence of traumatic brain injury, and fMRI to objectively demonstrate severe chronic pain by showing associated brain activation.

 

Bruce H. Stern | Stark & Stark, PC

Bruce H. Stern is an expert Civil Trial Attorney as certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. He is also a member of the firm’s Accident & Personal Injury practice.

Mr. Stern specializes his practice in representing the victims of traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries and wrongful death. In July 2004, Bruce began publishing the Traumatic Brain Injury Law Blog as a way to share his knowledge as a brain injury lawyer. Additionally, he is the author of numerous articles and a frequent lecturer on the subject of traumatic brain injury litigation, evidence and trial techniques. He also co-authored a book entitled “Litigating Brain Injuries” published by Thomson Reuters and a chapter entitled “Brain Injuries” which is included in AAJ’s Litigation Tort Case Series, published by AAJ Press. Bruce is the Treasurer of the North American Brain Injury Society and the past Treasurer of the International Brain Injury Association.

Bruce served as the President of the American Association for Justice (AAJ) from 2019-2020. He has been a member of the AAJ since 1982.

He is a member of the AAJ Executive Committee and the National Board of Governors. He is a past chair of the Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group and a past chair of AAJ’s Motor Vehicle Collision, Highway and Premises Section. Bruce is a past president of the New Jersey Association for Justice (formerly ATLA-NJ) and recipient of its highest award, the Gold Medal for Distinguished Service.

Additionally, Bruce handles construction incidents and has obtained an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) certificate through a 30-hour outreach training program for the construction industry.

Bruce is certified as a Certified Civil Trial Attorney by both the New Jersey Supreme Court and the National Board of Trial Advocacy. He is also a fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers and has been selected a fellow in the International Society of Barristers. Both organizations are highly selective and have rigorous standards for membership.

Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil Trial Attorney.

Agenda

Session I – The Hidden Severity of Concussions: Uncovering their Lasting Impact in Litigation | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • What makes a concussion potentially life changing
  • Pitfalls and insights regarding brain imaging
  • Life changes to be alerted to indicate a more persistent and disabling traumatic brain injury
  • The types of assessments that are important in proving this injury
  • The various defense challenges to proving this case

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Litigating Complex Concussion Claims: Leveraging Neuro-Evidence for Maximum Recovery | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Effective collaboration with neurologists, neuropsychologists and forensic experts
  • Quantifying and presenting long-term damages including vocational and quality-of-life loss
  • Persuasive trial themes and demonstrative tools for educating juries on brain injury science
  • Causation challenges: Bridging the gap between biomechanical forces and clinical presentation

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Rules and Sanctions Related to Gen AI in Law
Rules and Sanctions Related to Gen AI in Law Fri, December 5, 2025
Live Webcast
Digital Evidence and Technology in MDL Litigation
Digital Evidence and Technology in MDL Litigation Wed, December 10, 2025
Live Webcast
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, December 11, 2025
Live Webcast
Enforcement Priorities in a Trump FTC
Enforcement Priorities in a Trump FTC Wed, December 17, 2025
Live Webcast
Video Game Law for the Non-Game Lawyer
Video Game Law for the Non-Game Lawyer Wed, January 7, 2026
Live Webcast