Jeffrey M. Eilender is the co-managing partner of Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP and co-chair of the firm's civil litigation group. His commercial litigation practice centers on intra-corporate disputes and business separations, frequently in matters where the future of a company or an owner's net assets is at risk. With nearly 30 years of litigation experience, he has represented companies, majority owners, and dissenting or oppressed minority owners in business divorce matters, and has prosecuted and defended derivative actions.
Live Video-Broadcast: September 23, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
The Corporate Veil Is Getting Harder to Pierce and Easier to Hide Behind
Corporate separateness law shifted in 2025 and 2026. The Supreme Court's Dewberry ruling reaffirmed that affiliate profits stay out of reach without an independent veil-piercing analysis. State courts in Texas, Tennessee, New York, and North Carolina split into distinct statutory and common-law pathways. The Second Circuit's Aralpa decision and Pennsylvania's Mortimer framework rewrote the enforcement side.
Plead bare factors instead of supporting facts, and the complaint is dismissed. Sue the parent alone, and Dewberry blocks the affiliate's profits. Chase an LLC member's assets without addressing charging-order exclusivity, and the reverse piercing claim collapses. Wait until the damages phase to name affiliates, and the recovery may already be gone.
Attendees leave with a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction framework for drafting allegations that survive motions to dismiss. They gain a map matching reverse piercing and enterprise liability to a given enforcement posture. They walk out with a post-judgment discovery strategy that develops the factual record these theories require.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: September 23, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Jeffrey M. Eilender, Co-Managing Partner | Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP
Jeffrey M. Eilender is the co-managing partner of Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP and co-chair of the firm’s civil litigation group. His commercial litigation practice centers on intra-corporate disputes and business separations, frequently in matters where the future of a company or an owner’s net assets is at risk. With nearly 30 years of litigation experience, he has represented companies, majority owners, and dissenting or oppressed minority owners in business divorce matters, and has prosecuted and defended derivative actions. He regularly serves as lead trial lawyer in federal court, the commercial divisions of New York’s state courts, arbitral forums, and other venues around the nation, including the Delaware Chancery Court.
Mr. Eilender earned his J.D. from Columbia University Law School, where he was a Senior Editor of the Columbia Law Review, a Harlan Fisk Stone Scholar, and the winner of the Whitney North Seymour Medal for Trial Advocacy. He received his A.B. in History, magna cum laude, from Cornell University, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. He is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, and Eleventh Circuits and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. He clerked for Hon. Charles M. Metzner of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and Hon. Morton I. Greenberg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mr. Eilender has been selected to the New York Metro Super Lawyers list in Business Litigation, Civil Litigation, and General Litigation each year from 2010 through 2022. He holds firm-wide leadership roles at Schlam Stone & Dolan as co-managing partner and co-chair of the civil litigation group. Many of his business divorce matters have produced groundbreaking court rulings that are cited by other courts and are the subject of articles and blogs by other lawyers.
Mr. Eilender is a member of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association and co-chair of its New York State Judiciary Committee, and he has served on the Commercial Division (New York County) Advisory Committee, which advises on the Commercial Division’s practices. He is a member of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, the Federal Bar Council, and the American Bar Association, including the Business Divorce and Private Company sub-committee of its Business Law Section. A frequent lecturer at the New York State Bar’s Commercial Litigation Academy, he edits and writes the firm’s New York Commercial Division Blog and contributed to Bloomberg BNA’s 2017 Supplement to Litigating the Business Divorce.
Mr. Eilender litigates business conflicts of virtually every kind, including real estate, contract, intellectual property, trade secrets, employment, fraud, and other business tort cases. His clients have included large public entities, family businesses, and high net-worth individuals and celebrities such as AXA, Verizon, Oath (formerly AOL), ALP, Inc., Judith Regan, Perez Hilton, the Chetrit real estate family, the Lighthouse Group, Albert Einstein Medical School, Canon, and Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp. Representative results include successfully defending bluebird bio’s right to commercialize its billion-dollar gene therapy for thalassemia at trial; a $200 million lawsuit for global insurance giant AXA against ING in the Commercial Division of New York County Supreme Court; the trial and appeal that produced Chiu v. Chiu, 125 A.D.3d 824 (2d Dep’t 2015), a significant decision limiting use of the marketability discount for real estate holding entities; a $30 million arbitration award for a New York importer against its Chinese manufacturing partner; and a $13 million buyout for a minority LLC member in a dissolution proceeding in the Commercial Division of Nassau County Supreme Court. He began his career as a litigation associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.
Session 1 – Pleading and Proving Veil Piercing Under the 2025–2026 State Court Standards | 1:00pm – 2:00pm
This session examines the latest state court and Supreme Court developments governing how veil-piercing claims must be pleaded and proved in 2025 and 2026, with focused analysis of divergent statutory and common-law standards across Texas, Tennessee, New York, North Carolina, and the federal courts. Attorneys will learn how to distinguish entity-specific pathways, plead supporting facts rather than bare factors, and map corporate structures before filing. Participants will leave with a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction framework for drafting veil-piercing allegations that survive motions to dismiss under current standards.
Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm
Session 2 – Reverse Veil Piercing and Reaching Sister Entities in Judgment Enforcement | 2:10pm – 3:10pm
This session examines the doctrines of reverse veil piercing and horizontal (enterprise) liability as tools for reaching corporate affiliates and sister entities during post-judgment enforcement. Attorneys will work through the 2025 Second Circuit decision in Citibank v. Aralpa, the Supreme Court’s Dewberry ruling, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Mortimer enterprise liability framework to understand when and how these theories apply across key jurisdictions. Attendees will leave able to identify the correct theory for a given enforcement posture, navigate the charging-order exclusivity defense, and build a post-judgment discovery strategy to support reverse piercing claims.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
No MCLE Required
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General