Tax Issues in Settling Lawsuits: Planning and Reporting for Plaintiffs and Defendants

Robert W. Wood
Robert W. Wood | Wood LLP

Robert W. Wood is Managing Partner of Wood LLP in San Francisco, where his work centers on how settlements and judgments are taxed. He advises plaintiffs, defendants, lawyers, and settlement funds on these questions, and he wrote Taxation of Damage Awards & Settlement Payments (5th Ed. 2021) along with the Bloomberg Tax Management Portfolio Tax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments (522).

Live Video-Broadcast: January 12, 2027

1.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Settlement Number Is Not What Your Client Keeps

A settlement does not end the case for tax purposes. How it is planned and documented can change the tax result for plaintiffs and defendants alike. That holds whether the case involves employment claims, personal injury, or other types of litigation, and the tax issues differ across each one.

Sign the agreement before raising tax questions, and the chance to plan is gone. Ignore tax planning on the plaintiff side, and the client keeps less than expected. Treat every case type the same, and the tax result can catch both sides off guard. Leave reporting uncoordinated, and a reporting problem surfaces long after the case is closed.

You walk out with a practical framework for spotting tax issues early, addressing them during negotiations and in the settlement agreement, and handling the reporting that follows payment. This is planning and coordination judgment for both sides of the table, the kind of work a form cannot do for you.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Plan Before Signing
    How raising tax questions before the settlement agreement is signed protects what each side keeps or pays.
  • Payments and Documentation
    How the way settlement payments are planned and documented changes the tax result for plaintiffs and defendants.
  • What the Client Keeps
    How plaintiff-side tax planning shapes the amount a client actually keeps once the case is over.
  • Building Tax into Terms
    How to address tax issues during negotiations and write them into the settlement terms instead of after payment.
  • Employment, Injury, and Beyond
    How tax issues differ across employment, personal injury, and other types of litigation, and what that changes in each settlement.
  • Reporting After Payment
    How to identify each side’s reporting obligations after payment and coordinate them so no problem surfaces after the case closes.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: January 12, 2027

  • 2:30 pm – 4:10 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:10 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:10 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Robert W. Wood, Managing Partner | Wood LLP

Robert W. Wood is Managing Partner of Wood LLP in San Francisco, where his work centers on how settlements and judgments are taxed. He advises plaintiffs, defendants, lawyers, and settlement funds on these questions, and he wrote Taxation of Damage Awards & Settlement Payments (5th Ed. 2021) along with the Bloomberg Tax Management Portfolio Tax Aspects of Settlements and Judgments (522). His broader practice covers tax planning and tax controversies, and he serves as an expert witness on tax matters in civil cases and class actions.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Wood earned his J.D. in 1979 from the University of Chicago Law School, where he received the Florence James Adams Prize and a University of Chicago scholarship. He earned his A.B. in English, summa cum laude, from Humboldt State University in 1976 as a President’s Scholar, after studying at the University of Sheffield in England from 1975 to 1976. He is a Certified Tax Specialist through the California Board of Legal Specialization.

He is admitted to practice in California, New York, the District of Columbia, Montana, Washington, Arizona, Texas, and Wyoming, and is a qualified Solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales. His federal admissions include the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Tax Court, the Third, Seventh, Ninth, and District of Columbia Circuits, the Northern and Central Districts of California, the District of Arizona, and the Western District of Washington.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Wood is a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel. The State Bar of Montana gave him its Frank I. Haswell Award in 2023, and the Taxation Section of the California State Bar honored him with the V. Judson Klein Award in 2006. Best Lawyers in America has listed him from 2005 through 2027 and named him its 2015 San Francisco Tax Law “Lawyer of the Year.”

He is ranked among the top 10 tax lawyers by United States Lawyer Rankings, is recognized by Super Lawyers, and holds an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell. He has been elected to Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in American Law, Who’s Who in California, Who’s Who in the West, and Who’s Who in the World.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Wood joined the Taxation Law Advisory Commission of the California Board of Legal Specialization in 1989 and chaired it from 1991 to 1992. He served on the Executive Committee of the State Bar of California’s Taxation Section from 2000 to 2003 and on the Bloomberg BNA Real Estate Advisory Board from 2012 to 2014. He is a member of the Law Society of England and Wales, the Canadian Bar Association, and the Law Council of Australia.

  • Experience

Mr. Wood’s practice is best known for the tax side of resolving disputes: he counsels the plaintiffs who receive settlement and judgment payments, the defendants who make them, the lawyers who negotiate them, and the settlement funds that hold them. He also testifies as an expert witness on tax matters in civil litigation and class actions, including disputes over whether workers are independent contractors or employees.

Beyond settlements, he handles a broad range of tax planning and tax controversy matters. He writes regular columns for Tax Notes and Forbes, has authored numerous other tax books and hundreds of articles, and served as Editor-in-Chief of The M&A Tax Report (CCH) from 1992 to 2019. He has taught as an Adjunct Professor at Golden Gate University School of Law and as an Instructor at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Tax Planning and Reporting for Plaintiffs and Defendants | Robert W. Wood | 2:30pm – 4:10pm

This session covers tax planning and tax reporting for plaintiffs and defendants when a lawsuit settles. Attorneys will learn how tax issues differ across employment, personal injury, and other types of litigation, why planning before the agreement is signed matters for both sides, and what reporting follows payment. Attendees leave able to raise tax questions early, build them into settlement terms, and coordinate reporting between the parties once the case is closed.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Thu, November 19, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal Fri, November 20, 2026
Live Webcast