The New Digital-Asset Disclosure Mandates in Divorce: New York, California, and the Coming Multistate Wave

Sandra M. Radna
Sandra M. Radna
Law Offices of Sandra M. Radna, P.C.

Sandra M. Radna, Esq. is a divorce attorney and the founder of the Law Offices of Sandra M. Radna, P.C., with offices in Manhattan and Melville. She passionately advocates for her clients in resolving their legal issues and is the author of You’re Getting Divorced…Now What? The Ultimate Divorce Court Guide.

Alphonse Provinziano
Alphonse Provinziano
Provinziano & Associates

Alphonse Provinziano is a Certified Family Law Specialist whose Beverly Hills practice centers on high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth divorce, including hidden-asset and breach-of-fiduciary-duty litigation.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 6, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Disclosure Form Changed. Your Intake Questionnaire Didn’t

California’s 2025 Digital Financial Assets Law made digital-asset disclosure mandatory in dissolution proceedings. New York’s revised Statement of Net Worth, effective March 1, 2026, now compels it as well. Cryptocurrency, NFT, DeFi, and staking holdings are line items in both states — and a multistate wave is following.

Miss a wallet at intake, and the omission surfaces later through the IRS Form 1099-DA paper trail. Conceal holdings in California, and Family Code sections 1101 and 2107 supply the remedies. Pick the wrong valuation date for a volatile asset, and the passive/active appreciation distinction can reshape the division. Offer a blockchain forensic expert without preparing for Daubert, and the tracing evidence may never reach the court.

Both sessions are built for the file already on your desk. You leave with checklist-level command of the intake questions and red-flag indicators that surface hidden exposure. You leave with the discovery targets, exchange subpoena practice, and sanctions strategy that follow concealment. And you leave with a side-by-side view of how New York diverges from California, including the settlement drafting pitfalls — practitioner judgment no form-filler supplies.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Two New Disclosure Mandates
    How California’s 2025 Digital Financial Assets Law and the Family Code fiduciary duty framework, alongside New York’s revised Statement of Net Worth effective March 1, 2026, turn digital-asset disclosure into a core divorce competency.
  • Rebuilding Client Intake
    How to rewrite the intake questionnaire and read the red-flag indicators that surface hidden cryptocurrency, NFT, DeFi, and staking exposure before the first disclosure is filed.
  • The 1099-DA Paper Trail
    How IRS Form 1099-DA and Revenue Procedure 2024-28 create an independent record that practitioners can leverage as a discovery accelerant in either state.
  • Valuing Volatile Assets
    How California’s community property characterization and valuation date rules, and New York’s valuation date disputes and passive/active appreciation distinction, apply to assets that move daily.
  • Tracing, Subpoenas, and Sanctions
    How to deploy forensic blockchain tracing and exchange subpoena practice, get the forensic evidence past Daubert, and pursue remedies under Family Code §§ 1101 and 2107.
  • The Multistate Divide
    How the structural differences between the New York and California frameworks drive settlement drafting pitfalls, what the coming multistate wave means for your jurisdiction, and what to bring to the live Q&A.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 6, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Sandra M. Radna, Esq., Founding Attorney | Law Offices of Sandra M. Radna, P.C.

Sandra M. Radna, Esq. is a divorce attorney and the founder of the Law Offices of Sandra M. Radna, P.C., with offices in Manhattan and Melville. She passionately advocates for her clients in resolving their legal issues and is the author of You’re Getting Divorced…Now What? The Ultimate Divorce Court Guide. Sandra has provided legal commentary for Court TV, NPR, News 12 Long Island, and ABC, including commentary concerning the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial. She has also been published and quoted in numerous publications, including the New York Law Journal, New York Post, Ms. Magazine, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Vice, CNBC.com, NBC.com, and Refinery29, and has appeared on family law and divorce podcasts including How to Split a Toaster and Moms Moving On.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Radna earned her Juris Doctor at Ohio Northern University’s Claude W. Pettit College of Law and her B.A. in Natural Science from Hofstra University, where she majored in pre-med with a minor in psychology. She was admitted to the New York bar in 1993 and in the same year to the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Sandra M. Radna has been selected to Super Lawyers from 2021 through 2026 and recognized by Lawyers of Distinction for excellence in family and divorce law. Her other recognitions include the American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys, Long Island Business News’ Top 50 Women, and a 2019 citation from Nassau County Executive Laura Curran. She has served on the boards of the Long Island Advancement of Small Business and Hope for Youth, including as President of the Hope for Youth Board from 2016 through 2019.

  • Professional Involvement

Sandra M. Radna is a member of the New York State Bar Association, American Bar Association, New York State Trial Lawyers Association, American Institute of Trial Lawyers, American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys, and Lawyers of Distinction. She has also participated as a lecturer and featured speaker on legal topics, including presenting on divorce and the Innocent Spouse Rule at the National Conference of CPA Practitioners in 2019 and lecturing on cryptocurrency in divorce for the New York State Trial Lawyers Association in 2023.

  • Experience

More than thirty years of matrimonial and family law practice form the core of Ms. Radna’s work, from first client contact through final settlement. Her earlier professional experience includes practice at a medical malpractice defense firm, four years at the Nassau County Medical Center Poison Control Center, and work with the American Diabetes Association.

 

Alphonse Provinziano, Esq., Managing Partner & Senior Trial Attorney | Provinziano & Associates

Alphonse Provinziano is a Certified Family Law Specialist whose Beverly Hills practice centers on high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth divorce, including hidden-asset and breach-of-fiduciary-duty litigation. In 2026 he wrote for Law.com on the question divorce lawyers worldwide now face: who gets the Bitcoin. Since founding Provinziano & Associates in 2008 he has handled approximately 2,000 family law cases, personally tried more than 250 of them, and made over 1,500 court appearances, representing physicians, finance professionals, executives, and technology and media industry clients.

  • Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. at UC Law San Francisco (formerly Hastings College of the Law) and his B.A. with honors from the University of California, Berkeley. The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization has recognized him as a Certified Family Law Specialist since 2015. He is a Fellow of the International Academy of Family Lawyers and a member of the Association of European Attorneys.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He has been named to California Super Lawyers for seven consecutive years and to the Daily Journal’s Top Family Law Attorneys for four consecutive years, and he appears on Los Angeles Magazine’s Best of L.A. Legal 2026 list. He holds a 10.0 Avvo rating and has received the Avvo Client’s Choice Award eight times. From 2018 to 2022 he sat as a Temporary Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Provinziano is President-Elect of the Beverly Hills Bar Association, where he previously served as Vice President, Secretary-Treasurer, and a member of the Executive Committee. At the Los Angeles County Bar Association he co-chairs the Sorrell Trope Trial Institute, is past Chair of the Mentorship Committee, and has served on the Family Law Section Executive Committee. He is a former board member of the California Lawyers Association’s Family Law Executive Committee. His writing has appeared in Bloomberg Law, Law.com, the Daily Journal, Family Law News, Solicitors Journal, and STAT News, including a 2021 Family Law News article on obtaining discovery of trusts, their assets, and income to prove cash flow available for child and spousal support. He has been quoted by the Los Angeles Times, Newsweek, Business Insider, NPR, Politico, Vanity Fair, and the ABA Journal, among others.

  • Experience

His hidden-asset work includes a matter in which he secured a $700,000 family home for his client by proving concealed assets and a breach of fiduciary duty, a result affirmed on appeal, and a motion in limine that delivered the entire residence and 401(k) to his client without trial. His caseload spans property division, spousal support, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, child custody and move-away litigation, cross-border custody under the Hague Convention, domestic violence restraining orders, guardianship litigation, grandparents’ rights, and LGBTQ+ family law, with matters touching the United Kingdom, mainland China, France, Spain, Switzerland, and other European jurisdictions. Before founding the firm he served as a Deputy District Attorney in San Bernardino County.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – California: The Digital Financial Assets Law from Disclosure Through Sanctions | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session examines California’s mandatory digital-asset disclosure framework in dissolution proceedings, from the 2025 Digital Financial Assets Law through the sanctions available when a spouse conceals holdings. Attendees will learn how the DFAL interacts with the Family Code fiduciary duty regime, how the IRS Form 1099-DA reporting regime creates an independent paper trail practitioners can leverage in discovery, how to rebuild intake to surface hidden cryptocurrency exposure, and how California’s valuation date rules apply to volatile assets in a community property system. The session closes with forensic blockchain tracing, exchange subpoena practice, and the remedies available under Family Code sections 1101 and 2107. Attorneys leave with a checklist-level command of California intake questions, discovery targets, and sanctions strategy specific to digital assets.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – New York: The Revised Statement of Net Worth in Practice, and How New York Diverges from California | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session equips New York family law practitioners to handle digital assets from first client contact through final settlement under the revised Statement of Net Worth, effective March 1, 2026. Attendees will learn precisely what the revised disclosure form now requires, how to rebuild intake questionnaires to surface hidden cryptocurrency, NFT, DeFi, and staking exposure, how New York’s valuation date rules and the passive/active appreciation distinction apply to volatile assets, and how to deploy blockchain forensic tools and the IRS Form 1099-DA paper trail in discovery and at Daubert. The session closes with a comparative analysis of the structural differences between the New York and California frameworks — giving attendees the multistate perspective the program’s title promises — followed by settlement drafting pitfalls and live audience Q&A.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Getting Rid of Tax Penalties (Presented by Tax Rep)
Getting Rid of Tax Penalties (Presented by Tax Rep) Mon, October 12, 2026
Live Webcast
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust Wed, October 14, 2026
Live Webcast