Negotiating with Liars: Puffery, Fraud, and Playing Defense in Settlement Negotiations

Barry Temkin
Barry Temkin
Mound Cotton

Barry Temkin is a partner at Mound Cotton. He is a litigator with extensive trial experience, having tried over fifty jury trials to verdict. He has also litigated numerous arbitrations, including securities, commercial and employment disputes. Barry also represents lawyers and law firms in professional responsibility matters, including conflicts, sanction proceedings, fee disputes, legal malpractice cases and proceedings before the attorney grievance committee.

John B. Harris
John B. Harris
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, P.C

John B. Harris is a litigation partner with the New York City law firm of Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, P.C. He has more than 35 years’ experience representing clients in civil and white collar criminal matters, with a current focus is on the representation of lawyers and law firms.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 30, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Same Sentence Is Puffery From Counsel and Misrepresentation From a Neutral

ABA Formal Opinion 518 redrew the ethical terrain for attorney-mediators. Rule 4.1 and Comment [2] still shelter ordinary negotiation convention. That shelter narrows once counsel steps into a neutral role. The same statement changes character with the chair you sit in.

Overstate your authority and Rule 4.1 is in play. Stay silent on an insurance coverage limit and the half-truth doctrine reaches you anyway. Cross into Rule 8.4(c) and state-law and criminal exposure open beyond the Model Rules. Accept a no-reliance clause and your fraud claim may die at signing.

You leave with a working taxonomy of permissible, gray-zone, and impermissible statements. You leave with live-negotiation red flags, the FRCP 60(b)(3) route, and rescission and tort alternatives. You leave with defensive drafting language that survives an integration clause. These are judgment calls no research tool performs for you.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Rule 4.1 Boundaries
    How the negotiation-convention safe harbor in Comment [2] changes which settlement statements Model Rule 4.1 actually reaches.
  • Puffery Versus Fraud
    How the categories identified in ABA Formal Opinion 06-439 change the way you sort a statement into permissible, gray-zone, or impermissible.
  • Half-Truths and Omissions
    How the half-truth doctrine and omission-based liability change your duty to speak, including on insurance coverage.
  • Mediator Ethics Divergence
    How ABA Formal Opinion 518 changes the calculus when the same statement comes from a neutral rather than from counsel.
  • Detecting Deception Live
    How false authority claims and strategic omissions change what you do while the negotiation is still open.
  • Unwinding and Preventing Fraud
    How mediation confidentiality exceptions, FRCP 60(b)(3), rescission, and no-reliance and integration clauses change what you can undo after signing and what you draft before it.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 30, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Barry Temkin, Partner | Mound Cotton

Barry Temkin is a partner at Mound Cotton. He is a litigator with extensive trial experience, having tried over fifty jury trials to verdict. He has also litigated numerous arbitrations, including securities, commercial and employment disputes. Barry also represents lawyers and law firms in professional responsibility matters, including conflicts, sanction proceedings, fee disputes, legal malpractice cases and proceedings before the attorney grievance committee.

  • Education & Credentials

He is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and the University of Rochester.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Barry is an adjunct professor at Fordham University School of Law, where he teaches courses on securities regulation and professional responsibility. He has published articles on securities law and attorney professionalism in the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Law360, the Securities Regulation Law Journal, Seattle University Law Review, Securities Arbitration Commentator, and the New York Law Journal. He has been quoted in the ABA Journal, Investment News, the New York Law Journal, The Economist, the Wall Street Journal, Law360, the National Law Journal, American Banker, Lawyers U.S.A. and other publications.

Adjunct Professor, Fordham University School of Law, 2007–present; Super Lawyer, New York Metro 2021: Professional Liability: Defense, 2015-2023; Otto L. Walter Distinguished Writing Award, New York Law School, 2008.

  • Professional Involvement

Barry has been a member of the FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) Board of Arbitrators since 1999, and served for ten years as co-chair of the New York Country Lawyers’ Association Professional Ethics Committee. He has lectured on securities law, professional liability and legal ethics at the New York State Bar Association, the New York County Lawyers’ Association, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, the Practicing Law Institute, the Futures Industry Association and numerous corporations and insurance companies.

Co-chair, New York County Lawyers’ Association Committee on Professional Ethics, 2006 –2016; Member, 2001–present; Member, Editorial Board of Oxford University Press, New York Rules of Professional Conduct; Member, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Board of Arbitrators, 1999–present; New York County Lawyers’ Association, Committee on Futures and Derivatives; Volunteer Attorney, Trial Lawyers Care, 2001–2004.

  • Experience

As an Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn, he tried dozens of jury cases and served as a Senior Trial Attorney in the Homicide Bureau. He represents broker dealers, financial advisors, insurance brokers, financial firms and investment advisers in litigation, arbitration and regulatory investigations. He also litigates and tries commercial, construction and professional liability cases.

 

John B. Harris, Partner | Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, P.C

John B. Harris is a litigation partner with the New York City law firm of Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, P.C. He has more than 35 years’ experience representing clients in civil and white collar criminal matters, with a current focus is on the representation of lawyers and law firms.

  • Education & Credentials

John is a graduate of Yale University and the New York University School of Law. He earned his B.A. cum laude from Yale University in 1978 and his J.D. from New York University School of Law in 1985, where he was a member of the Annual Survey of American Law. He is admitted in New York and Connecticut and before the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and he appears in SEC, FINRA, and Departmental Disciplinary Committee proceedings.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He is a former Chair of the Professional Responsibility Committee of the New York City Bar Association and serves as a mediator for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Super Lawyers has recognized him for eighteen consecutive years, and he sat on Law360’s Legal Ethics Editorial Board in 2022. Within the New York City Bar Association he has also served on the Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics, the Committee on Professional Discipline, the Judiciary Committee, and the Task Force on Multi-Disciplinary Practice. At the Anti-Defamation League he has chaired both the New York Regional Board and the National Civil Rights Committee.

  • Professional Involvement

He sits as a Delegate to the House of Delegates of the New York State Bar Association and on its Professional Discipline Committee, and belongs to the American Bar Association, the New York State Bar Foundation, and the NYU Law Alumni Association. His writing on professional responsibility includes “Probing the Mysterious ‘Materially Adverse’ Standard for Attorney-Client Conflicts” in the PLI Chronicle and “Masking Tapes: An Analysis of the Law of Secret Recording in New York” in the New York Legal Ethics Reporter, alongside expert analysis columns for Law360. He presented “When the Lawyer Becomes the Source of Evidence” at the APRL Conference in San Antonio on February 6, 2026 and has taught “Current Ethical Issues for In-House Counsel” for the New York City Bar in 2024 and 2025.

  • Experience

He regularly testifies as an expert witness on professional responsibility and legal ethics matters.
Before joining Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz he was a partner at Stillman & Friedman, P.C. and at Ballard Spahr LLP, and earlier a reporter for The Hartford Courant. His defense work for lawyers and law firms includes a conflicts disqualification defense for a patent firm, a discrimination defense for a law firm, and the defense of an in-house lawyer accused of aiding and abetting fraud. Other representations include SEC v. Thrasher and the Crown Heights civil rights litigation on behalf of former New York City Mayor David Dinkins and Police Commissioner Lee Brown.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Puffery or Misrepresentation: What Lawyers May Say in Settlement Negotiations | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session examines the ethical and legal boundaries governing attorney statements in settlement negotiations, focusing on the line between permissible puffery and actionable misrepresentation under Model Rule 4.1, Rule 8.4(c), and ABA Formal Opinions 06-439 and 518. Attorneys will learn which categories of statements qualify for the negotiation-convention safe harbor under Comment [2], which statements cross into material misrepresentation, and how the half-truth doctrine and omission-based liability expand exposure beyond affirmative falsehoods. Attendees will leave with a working taxonomy of permissible, gray-zone, and impermissible statements they can apply immediately to their own negotiation and settlement practice.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Detecting, Proving, and Remedying Deception in Settlement Negotiations and Mediation | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session equips attorneys with a practical framework for identifying deception during settlement negotiations and mediation, challenging fraudulent agreements after execution, and drafting defensive provisions that reduce exposure from the outset. Attendees will examine the evidentiary and procedural requirements for setting aside settlements obtained by fraud, the state-by-state landscape of mediation confidentiality exceptions, and the full menu of post-settlement remedies including FRCP 60(b)(3) motions, rescission, and direct tort claims. Attorneys leave with specific detection techniques, defensive drafting strategies, and an understanding of the ethical enforcement mechanisms available when opposing counsel crosses the line.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
1 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes, 60 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Dual

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours, 1 Ethics / Professionalism Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, August 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast