Reviving the Whistleblower Protection Act for Civil Service Employees

Tom Devine
Tom Devine
Government Accountability Project

Since 1979 Tom Devine has been the Government Accountability Project’s legal director. Tom has assisted over 9,000 whistleblowers and not lost a case since 2006. He also has been on the front lines for passage and oversight of 38 whistleblower laws, including nearly all U.S. federal laws and internationally from Serbia to the UN, and most recently the EU Whistleblower Directive and Ukraine’.

David Seide
David Seide
Government Accountability Project

David Seide serves as Of Counsel for Government Accountability Project, the nation’s leading whistleblower protection and advocacy organization. His career spans four decades of government oversight and investigations work: he has served on the staffs of two federal Offices of Inspector General, where he led multiple highprofile investigations, and as Special Counsel to Senator Jeff Merkley.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 29, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

The law that launched a global free speech revolution can no longer protect its own

The Whistleblower Protection Act pioneered a global legal revolution in free speech rights. Its enforcement machinery has now turned hostile to its own objectives. In a cycle of unprecedented political repression, attacks on the constitutionality of Administrative Judges have shattered the law’s credibility. The Supreme Court’s Slaughter decision compounded the damage, replacing structural independence with at will status for Office of Special Counsel and Merit Systems Protection Board leadership.

The practical stakes are immediate. Advise a client to act on their rights, and official approval of whatever retaliation they challenge is almost guaranteed. Responsible practitioners must now warn potential clients of that reality before filing. And the crisis is not entirely new — realistically, the law has never been free from political pressure.

This program examines the record behind these conclusions, then turns to what still works. Attendees leave with practitioner tactics for circumventing the current threats — remedies drawn from the anti-gag statute and the constitution — and concrete guidance for continuing to effectively defend whistleblower clients.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Global Legal Revolution
    Where the Whistleblower Protection Act sits in the worldwide expansion of whistleblower free speech rights, and why that context shapes client strategy.
  • Administrative Judge Attacks
    How challenges to the constitutionality of Administrative Judges undermine the forums your retaliation claims depend on.
  • The Slaughter Decision
    How at will status for Office of Special Counsel and Merit Systems Protection Board leadership changes your enforcement calculus.
  • Weak Track Record
    Why the law’s historically weak record and persistent political pressure require warning potential clients before they act on their rights.
  • Anti-Gag Remedies
    Tactics for circumventing the current threats through remedies from the anti-gag statute.
  • Constitutional Remedies
    How constitutional claims give whistleblower counsel a path to still effectively defend their clients.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 29, 2026 

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Tom Devine, Legal Director | Government Accountability Project

Since 1979 Tom Devine has been the Government Accountability Project’s legal director. Tom has assisted over 9,000 whistleblowers and not lost a case since 2006. He also has been on the front lines for passage and oversight of 38 whistleblower laws, including nearly all U.S. federal laws and internationally from Serbia to the UN, and most recently the EU Whistleblower Directive and Ukraine’. He is an adjunct professor at the DC Law School, has been recognized annually since 2012 by the Metropolitan Washington Lawyer’s Association as one of Washington DC’s top employment lawyers, appears regularly as a media expert, has authored numerous books and law journals, and spoken in over a dozen nations as the State Department’s informal “Ambassador of Whistleblowing.”

  • Education & Credentials

Tom is a Phi Beta Kappa honors graduate of Georgetown University, where he was an All American debater and captained a team that set a still-standing national record for tournament championships. He earned his J.D. from the Antioch School of Law.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Tom’s 2011 book, The Corporate Whistleblowers Survival Guide: A Handbook for Committing the Truth, won the 2012 International Business Book of the Year Award at the Frankfurt Book Fair. He is the recipient of the Hugh Hefner First Amendment Award and the Defender of the Constitution Award bestowed by the Fund for Constitutional Government, and in 2006 he was inducted into the Freedom of Information Act Hall of Fame.

  • Professional Involvement

Tom serves on the board of Whistleblowing International Network, the global coalition he helped to found, and on the board of the Disaster Accountability Project. His other publications include Courage Without Martyrdom: The Whistleblower’s Survival Guide and chapters in numerous books, law review articles, magazine articles, and newspaper op-eds.

  • Experience

Tom has led campaigns to pass or defend whistleblower laws including the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 for federal employees, thirteen laws since 2002 creating jury-trial rights for corporate whistleblowers, and the European Union Whistleblower Directive, along with United Nations, Organization of American States, World Bank, and African Development Bank policies legalizing public freedom of expression for their own whistleblowers. In his casework he has prevailed in advocacy at numerous U.S. courts of appeals as well as the Supreme Court, and his clients’ disclosures have produced results ranging from the shutdown of accident-prone nuclear power plants to a national commercial milk testing program for illegal animal drugs and the withdrawal of dangerous prescription drugs such as Vioxx. He has traveled to 36 countries for whistleblower rights advocacy and has served as a technical expert for the drafting or advocacy of additional whistleblower laws and policies in nations ranging from Liberia and Tunisia to Great Britain and Italy.

 

David Seide, Of Counsel | Government Accountability Project

David Seide serves as Of Counsel for Government Accountability Project, the nation’s leading whistleblower protection and advocacy organization. His career spans four decades of government oversight and investigations work: he has served on the staffs of two federal Offices of Inspector General, where he led multiple highprofile investigations, and as Special Counsel to Senator Jeff Merkley.

  • Education & Credentials

David holds a J.D. from New York University School of Law, an MPA from Princeton University, and a B.A. and M.A. in History from the University of Pennsylvania. He began his legal career in 1983 as a law clerk to U.S. District Judge Morris E. Lasker.

  • Recognition & Leadership

David received the Award for Excellence in Investigation from the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE). He is the author of two books on investigations: Warning the Witness: A Guide to Internal Investigations and the Attorney-Client Privilege, published by the American Bar Association, and Navigating Multiple Government Investigations: Critical Issues and Guiding Principles.

  • Professional Involvement

Before joining Government Accountability Project, David served as Special Counsel to Senator Jeff Merkley. His practice at Government Accountability Project also includes a specialization in immigration issues.

  • Experience

David served on the staffs of two federal Offices of Inspector General — at the U.S. Department of State and the Federal Housing Finance Agency — where he led multiple high-profile investigations, including the State Department OIG’s evaluation of email records management and cybersecurity requirements in the Office of the Secretary. Earlier in his career, he served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice, prosecuting white collar and securities fraud cases, and was a partner at multiple private law firms.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The Whistleblower Protection Act’s Credibility Crisis: The Global Legal Revolution, the Current Threats, and the Track Record | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

The Whistleblower Protection Act has been the pioneer for a global legal revolution in free speech rights. But the enforcement options are now so hostile to its objectives that responsible practitioners must warn potential clients that acting on their rights almost guarantees official approval of whatever retaliation they challenge. In a cycle of unprecedented political repression, the law’s credibility has been shattered through attacks on the constitutionality of Administrative Judges, as well as the Supreme Court’s Slaughter decision replacing structural independence with at will status for the Office of Special Counsel and Merit Systems Protection Board leadership. Further, realistically the law never has been free from political pressure.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Tactics to Circumvent the Current Threat: Remedies from the Anti-Gag Statute and the Constitution | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

The presentation will examine the record for these conclusions and offer guidance how whistleblower counsel can circumvent them to still effectively defend their clients. This session delivers that guidance: tactics to circumvent the current threat through remedies from the anti-gag statute and the constitution, so counsel can continue to effectively defend civil service employees despite enforcement options now hostile to the law’s objectives.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Managing Tariff and Trade Enforcement Risk in 2026
Managing Tariff and Trade Enforcement Risk in 2026 Mon, September 28, 2026
Live Webcast