Aircraft Loan Defaults and Enforcement: Replevin, Foreclosure, and Litigation Strategies Under Florida Law

Laura Rodriguez
Laura Rodriguez | Barakat + Bossa

Laura Rodriguez is an Attorney in Barakat + Bossa’s Aviation Practice and its Litigation + Dispute Resolution group, where her work includes the enforcement side of aviation finance: aircraft foreclosures, repossession, and asset recovery for lenders and other secured parties after a borrower default.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 10, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Federal law governs FAA recording; Florida law governs enforcement

Aircraft loan defaults involve federal aviation law, FL secured-transactions law, and state court litigation at once. Under Fla. Stat. § 329.01, an FAA-recorded instrument takes effect from the date it’s recorded, not the date it was signed. After default, Florida law takes over: Chapter 78 governs possession, and Part VI of Chapter 679 governs the sale and any deficiency. Meanwhile, the aircraft can leave the jurisdiction within an hour, lose value every month it sits out of maintenance, and pick up competing liens from repair stations, fuel suppliers and hangars. Counsel for lenders, servicers, owners and guarantors need to work through both bodies of law while keeping control of collateral that can be moved without notice.

Every stage of aircraft loan enforcement has a trap that can cost the lender the aircraft, the deficiency, or both. Skip the competing-lien search, and a mechanic who no longer has the aircraft can still assert an enforceable lien. Breach the peace during a self-help repossession, and the lender becomes the defendant. Seize the aircraft on a thin replevin petition, and the writ may be dissolved, leaving the bond exposed. Buy at a private sale or miss notice to another FAA-recorded lienholder, and the deficiency may disappear. Rely on the FAA Certificate of Repossession to fix a defective foreclosure, and the lender has only certified compliance that never happened. In aircraft enforcement, the lender’s recovery depends on getting each step right under Florida law the first time.

You’ll leave with a practical framework for aircraft loan enforcement, from the first sign of default to final judgment. It covers how to protect priority, recover possession, dispose of the aircraft, preserve the lender’s recovery, and close out the FAA record.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • FAA recording and priority
    How federal recording and Fla. Stat. § 329.01 set priority among competing interests, and where UCC-1 filings still matter for engines, parts, and proceeds.
  • Competing statutory liens
    How lender security interests collide with mechanic’s and fuel liens that can be perfected without possession under Fla. Stat. §§ 329.41 and 329.51, and why those statutes leave priority to FAA recording under Fla. Stat. § 329.01.
  • Default and self-help repossession
    Events of default, acceleration and notice, and the limits on self-help repossession under Fla. Stat. § 679.609, including disputes over logbooks and maintenance records.
  • Prejudgment ex parte writ of replevin
    Using Fla. Stat. § 78.068 to seize the aircraft without advance notice, proving nonpayment or flight risk through sworn facts, setting the bond, and defending the writ against a motion to dissolve.
  • Disposing of the aircraft
    Judicial versus non-judicial disposition under Part VI of Chapter 679, notice to the borrower and other FAA-recorded secured parties, limits on lender purchases at private sales, and using court approval under Fla. Stat. § 679.627(3) to insulate the sale from commercial-reasonableness challenges.
  • Deficiency litigation and FAA close-out
    The lender’s burden to prove compliance under Fla. Stat. § 679.626, aircraft valuation disputes, common borrower defenses, and the limits of the FAA Certificate of Repossession.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 10, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Laura Rodriguez, Attorney | Barakat + Bossa

Laura Rodriguez is an Attorney in Barakat + Bossa’s Aviation Practice and its Litigation + Dispute Resolution group, where her work includes the enforcement side of aviation finance: aircraft foreclosures, repossession, and asset recovery for lenders and other secured parties after a borrower default. She has been part of the firm’s team on aviation enforcement matters, including a court-authorized repossession of an aircraft at Miami Executive Airport following litigation to enforce payment for maintenance services. She also represents clients in complex commercial litigation involving breach of contract, business torts, and partnership disputes, and

is actively involved in case development, legal strategy, motion practice, and trial preparation.

        •     Education & Credentials

Ms. Rodriguez earned her J.D. from Florida International University College of Law, where she served as a Judicial Intern for the Honorable Migna Sanchez-Llorens at the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court. She holds a B.A. in World Politics and Hispanic Studies from Hamilton College. She is admitted to the Florida Bar and to the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida.

        •     Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Rodriguez was selected to speak on aircraft foreclosures at the Florida Aviation Business Association (FABA) 2026 Conference in Tampa, addressing the legal and procedural considerations that shape enforcement, recovery, and risk in aviation finance matters, alongside colleagues presenting on aircraft transactions and the panel “Flight Plan for Compliance – Legal & Tax Essentials in Aviation.”

        •     Professional Involvement

Ms. Rodriguez practices within Barakat + Bossa’s Aviation Practice, which advises lenders, lessors, and lienholders on aircraft repossession and recovery actions, enforcement of security interests and lien rights, litigation involving loan defaults, breach of lease, and title disputes, and creditor-side strategy in bankruptcy proceedings. She is a member of the Florida Bar and is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Middle Districts of Florida. She works in English and Spanish.

        •    Experience

Ms. Rodriguez’s practice centers on aviation enforcement and commercial litigation. On the aviation side, she has worked on matters involving the enforcement of payment obligations for aircraft maintenance work and the recovery of the aircraft itself, including a matter in which the firm secured a final judgment for damages and foreclosure and executed a writ of replevin resulting in recovery of the aircraft. Her broader litigation work involves breach of contract, business torts, and partnership disputes, which she supports from case development through legal strategy, motion practice, and trial preparation.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Securing the Aircraft: Priority, Default, and Ex Parte Replevin | Laura Rodriguez | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session covers the first phase of an aircraft loan default: establishing whose claim comes first and getting control of the aircraft before it can be moved. It starts with how FAA recording and Fla. Stat. § 329.01 set priority among competing interests, and where UCC-1 filings still matter for engines, parts, and proceeds. It then addresses mechanic’s and fuel liens that can be perfected without possession under Fla. Stat. §§ 329.41 and 329.51, and why those statutes leave priority to FAA recording. Next, it turns to events of default, acceleration and notice, and the limits on self-help repossession under Fla. Stat. § 679.609, including disputes over logbooks and maintenance records. The session closes with the ex parte prejudgment writ of replevin under Fla. Stat. § 78.068. It covers why seizing the aircraft without advance notice gives lenders a strategic advantage, how to establish nonpayment or flight risk through sworn facts, how the bond is set, and how to defend the writ against a motion to dissolve.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – From Possession to Final Judgment: Disposition, Deficiency, and FAA Close-Out | Laura Rodriguez | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

Repossessing the aircraft doesn’t end the borrower’s ownership or guarantee the lender’s recovery. This session covers how to complete the process without losing the deficiency. It compares judicial and nonjudicial disposition under Part VI of Chapter 679, including who must receive notice (the borrower and other FAA-recorded secured parties), the limits on lender purchases at private sales, and how court approval under Fla. Stat. § 679.627(3) can protect the sale from commercial-reasonableness challenges. It then moves to deficiency litigation: the lender’s burden to prove compliance under Fla. Stat. § 679.626, aircraft valuation disputes, and common borrower defenses. The session ends with the FAA close-out and why the Certificate of Repossession records the result of the Florida proceeding but cannot cure a defective foreclosure.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Tue, November 10, 2026
Live Webcast