SALT Considerations for Remote Sellers: Nexus, P.L. 86-272, Apportionment, and Sales Tax in the Digital Economy

Eugene J. Gibilaro
Joshua M. Sivin
Christopher M. Lash
Eugene J. Gibilaro | Blank Rome
Joshua M. Sivin | Blank Rome
Christopher M. Lash | Blank Rome

Live Video-Broadcast: December 7, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Your Client’s Website May Already Be Doing Business in States Where It Has No Office

Physical presence no longer settles the question. New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts have reinterpreted P.L. 86-272 for internet activities. The American Catalog Mailers Ass’n litigation tested those rules in both states. New York’s Third Department ruled May 7, 2026; the New Jersey Tax Court ruled October 1, 2026. Email, chatbots and cookies remain open.
Put one employee or officer in a state, and nexus can follow. Offer synchronous website support, and New Jersey’s holding reaches you. File in New York, and the December 2023 rules bring a 2015 look-back. Join a combined group, and protection is tested member by member. Sell streaming or SaaS remotely, and sales tax, Ohio CAT sourcing and Maryland’s digital advertising tax come into play.
This panel works through the calls you will actually make. You walk out with a website function inventory, a de minimis record and a disclose-or-hold decision. You also get a working approach to sourcing receipts, nexus and taxability studies, voluntary disclosures, amnesty and managed audits. That is practitioner judgment a generic summary cannot supply.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Constitutional Nexus Limits

How Due Process, the Commerce Clause and the unitary business principle after Allied-Signal cap what a state may tax, and how bright-line thresholds, remote employees and officers create “doing business” nexus.

  • P.L. 86-272 Online

How N.J.A.C. 18:7-1.9A, 20 NYCRR 1-2.10, the Massachusetts amendment to 830 CMR 63.39.1(4)(e) and the ACMA decisions change which website functions—email, chatbots and cookies—still fall within the protection.

  • Effective Dates & Groups

How New York’s December 2023 rules, the 2015 look-back and member-by-member protection and reallocation rules in a combined group change the periods and entities you must review.

  • Sourcing Remote Receipts

How market-based versus cost-of-performance sourcing for services and digital receipts, and point-of-delivery versus ultimate-destination rules for goods, change where a remote seller’s receipts land.

  • Sales and Digital Taxes

How economic thresholds, marketplace facilitator collection, the taxability of streaming, SaaS and information services, Ohio CAT sourcing, Maryland’s digital advertising tax and ITFA preemption change a remote seller’s collection duties.

  • Managing Remote Exposure

How a website function inventory, a de minimis record, nexus and taxability studies, voluntary disclosures, amnesty, managed audits and refund traps shape the disclose-or-hold decision.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 7, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 pm – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 09:00 am – 11:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Eugene J. Gibilaro, Partner | Blank Rome

Eugene Gibilaro focuses his practice on tax controversy and transactions primarily in the areas of state and local income and franchise tax, sales and use tax, and unclaimed property. He defends audits and litigates U.S. state and local tax matters before judicial courts and administrative tribunals around the country.

  • Education & Credentials

Bar Admissions: Florida; New York
Education: George Washington University, BA; New York Law School, JD; New York University School of Law, LLM
During law school, he served as a senior editor of the New York Law School Law Review and as a judicial extern for the Honorable Chief Judge Arthur Gonzalez of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York.

  • Recognition & Leadership

2025–2026, “Leading Global Tax Lawyer,” listed by Lawdragon; 2024–2025, Ones to Watch, Tax Law, listed in Best Lawyers in America©; 2023–2026, listed in The Legal 500 United States; 2022, recognized in Marquis Who’s Who biographical volume

  • Professional Involvement

He has published articles on state and local tax topics for TEI Magazine, State Tax Notes, Law360, and the Journal of State Taxation. He also frequently delivers lectures on state and local tax issues and has spoken at the Annual Ohio Business Tax Conference, the Michigan Tax Conference, NYU Institute of State and Local Taxation, Paul J. Hartman State and Local Tax Forum and before numerous organizations, including New York University’s School of Professional Studies Tax Conferences in July; the Council On State Taxation; the National Association of State Bar Tax Sections (NASBTS) Annual Meeting; and the New Jersey Society of Enrolled Agents.

  • Experience

Prior to joining Blank Rome, Eugene was an attorney at a leading Am Law 100 firm focusing on tax controversy and also worked at one of the big four accounting firms, where he advised private equity and corporate clients on state and local income, sales and use, property and employment tax, and unclaimed property aspects of mergers and acquisitions in a variety of industries.

 

Joshua M. Sivin, Of Counsel | Blank Rome

Josh Sivin is an experienced tax attorney with broad experience in state and local tax controversy and has appeared before tax appeals tribunals and in state and federal trial and appellate courts. He advises clients on complex business income, withholding, and sales and use tax issues in jurisdictions across the country.

  • Education & Credentials

Bar Admissions: New York
Court Admissions: U.S. District Court – Eastern District of New York; U.S. District Court – Southern District of New York; United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Education: St. John’s University School of Law, JD; New York University School of Law, LLM; Adelphi University, BA

  • Recognition & Leadership

Josh is a recognized thought leader in the field, having published numerous articles—including in “Tax Notes States”—and is a frequent speaker on state and local tax topics.

  • Professional Involvement

His speaking engagements include the California Tax Policy Conference, the NYU Introduction to State and Local Tax Program, and various CLE presentations on state and local tax issues.

  • Experience

Prior to joining the firm, Josh served as senior counsel with the New York City Law Department, where he litigated business tax disputes on behalf of the City and advised the City and its agencies on a broad range of tax issues. Earlier in his career, he practiced as a litigator at a leading Am Law 25 firm, representing clients in a wide range of commercial disputes.

 

Christopher M. Lash, Associate | Blank Rome

Christopher M. Lash focuses his practice on state and local tax (“SALT”) controversy, tax planning, and transactional tax matters.

  • Education & Credentials

Bar Admissions: Pennsylvania
Education: Seton Hall University, BS; Villanova University School of Law, JD

  • Recognition & Leadership

Christopher Lash has written recent analyses of state tax rulings, including the Ohio Supreme Court’s rejection of the CAT on phantom list prices, and spoke at Blank Rome’s National SALT Litigation Update in October 2026.

  • Professional Involvement

While in law school, he served as a Certified Legal Intern at the Villanova Law Federal Tax Clinic and a member of the Tax Law Society, the Corporate Law Society, and the Real Estate Law Society.

  • Experience

Christopher’s experience includes advising multinational corporations and high-net worth entities on SALT controversy, state tax audits, and tax planning strategies. He represents clients in state tax disputes, audits, and appeals. Christopher also conducts buy-side and sell-side SALT due diligence, assessing state tax exposure, nexus implications, apportionment methodologies, and post-deal structuring.
Christopher also has significant litigation experience, representing clients in complex litigation matters.
Prior to joining the firm, Christopher served as a SALT manager at a Big Four accounting firm and an associate at a Philadelphia-based litigation firm.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Income and Franchise Tax Nexus for Remote Sellers, and State Attempts to Limit the Reach of P.L. 86-272 | Eugene J. Gibilaro & Joshua M. Sivin & Christopher M. Lash | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This hour covers the income and franchise tax exposure a remote seller faces when it has no traditional physical footprint in a state. It begins with the constitutional limits on state taxing power, including the principle that a state may not tax value earned outside its borders. It then turns to “doing business” standards, under which even one in-state employee or an in-state officer can create nexus. Most of the hour addresses how states have reinterpreted P.L. 86-272 for internet activities, including N.J.A.C. 18:7-1.9A, 20 NYCRR 1-2.10 and the Massachusetts amendment to 830 CMR 63.39.1(4)(e). It also covers the American Catalog Mailers Ass’n litigation in New York and New Jersey and the questions those courts left open. Attendees leave with a framework for inventorying a client’s in-state and online activities and judging which ones still fall within the protection.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Beyond P.L. 86-272: Apportionment, Sales and Use Tax, and Other Taxes for Remote Sellers | Eugene J. Gibilaro & Joshua M. Sivin & Christopher M. Lash | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This hour moves past income tax nexus to the other SALT issues that shape a remote seller’s multistate liability. It begins with how states source receipts from services and digital offerings. Courts have reached divergent results under market-based and cost-of-performance regimes. It also covers delivery and destination tests for tangible goods. The session then addresses sales and use tax for remote sellers, including economic nexus and marketplace collection. It also covers taxability of streaming, software, and data services. It then surveys gross receipts taxes, digital advertising taxes, and Internet Tax Freedom Act limits. It closes with strategies for managing exposure as audit activity increases, including voluntary disclosures, amnesty programs, and managed audits.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via Attorney Submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

The Federal Bar Association reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law and Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Tue, November 10, 2026
Live Webcast