Defending the Law Firm When a Lawyer’s Burnout Disclosure Becomes an ADA Accommodation and Retaliation Claim

Adria Lynn Silva
Adria Lynn Silva | Sass Law Firm

Ms. Silva is an attorney at Sass Law Firm with over 25 years of experience in labor and employment law matters, representing employees suffering discrimination and harassment based on age, disability, family status, gender/sex, marital status, national origin, pregnancy, race, religion, and sexual orientation.

Live Video-Broadcast: January 12, 2027

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

A burnout disclosure can become a disability claim against your own firm

Since Muldrow v. City of St. Louis lowered the harm needed to challenge a job reassignment, a reduced docket can itself be an adverse action. Lawyers have begun suing their own firms for disability discrimination and retaliation. Disability-accommodation suits rose about 42 percent in 2025, with mental-health requests named as a driver.

Treat “burnout” as ordinary stress, and Way shows how little a disclosure needs to put the firm on notice. Cut the docket with the lawyer’s consent, and Herkert shows consent alone may not protect you. Freeze references after the charge, and the Brosy complaint shows the retaliation count that follows. Give notice to the carrier too late, and the EPLI policy may deny coverage.

You walk out with a decision tree for the first calls after a disclosure, sample accommodation language, a preservation and insurance-tender checklist, and an annotated position statement outline. These are judgment calls that turn on each firm’s partnership agreement, policies, and records.

Key topics to be discussed:

      •   Employee or Owner

How the Clackamas factors and Lemon decide whether a lawyer is an employee or an owner, and whether the firm meets the 15-employee threshold.

  •  When Burnout Becomes Notice

How an informal burnout or anxiety disclosure becomes notice of a disability, and how to handle medical information and leave in a firm without a human resources department.

  • Essential Functions and the Docket

How billables, trial availability, and client responsiveness fare as essential functions, and how to reduce a caseload without creating an adverse reassignment.

  • Preservation and Position Statement

How to choose the forum, preserve the records plaintiff’s counsel reads first, and draft a position statement when the witnesses are partners.

  • Retaliation Risk

How timing, reassignment, and a reference freeze build a retaliation claim, and how temporal gaps are measured under Way and Herkert.

  • EPLI Tender and Settlement

How notice, awareness, and consent-to-settle provisions shape an EPLI tender, and which settlement terms a law firm can actually enforce.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: January 12, 2027

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Adria Lynn Silva, Attorney | Sass Law Firm

Ms. Silva is an attorney at Sass Law Firm with over 25 years of experience in labor and employment law matters, representing employees suffering discrimination and harassment based on age, disability, family status, gender/sex, marital status, national origin, pregnancy, race, religion, and sexual orientation. She has extensive experience representing students and employees in Title IX claims against high schools, vocational schools, and universities, regarding a variety of issues including claims of pregnancy discrimination, access to athletics, equal pay, harassment, and retaliation.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Silva graduated from the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Miami School of Law. Ms. Silva is licensed to practice in the United States Supreme Court, the State of Florida, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

  • Recognition & Leadership

She currently serves as a Board Member of the National Employment Lawyers Association and is the NELA Vice President of Affiliate Relations. In 2025, Ms. Silva was elected to the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers and is serving on the Executive Council of the Florida Bar Labor and Employment Section. Ms. Silva previously served on the executive board of the Florida Chapter of the National Employment Lawyers Association (Florida NELA) for seven years and served as the President in 2009-2010. Ms. Silva was the 2012-2013 President of the Thomas S. Biggs American Inn of Court (now Michael R. N. McDonnell American Inn of Court) and is currently serving on the Inn executive board.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Silva often speaks on various topics in employment and Title IX law and contributed to a book, The Pregnancy Discrimination Act: A Guide for the Plaintiff’s Employment Lawyer, on pregnancy discrimination regarding Title IX and pregnancy.

  • Experience

In addition to her employment and Title IX practice, Ms. Silva has represented homeowners and tenants under the Fair Housing Act and customers and patrons in cases of discrimination in places of public accommodation.

Before joining Sass Law Firm, Ms. Silva spent years in her own private practice representing students and employees in discrimination, retaliation and harassment cases. She began her legal career with Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc. in Immokalee, Florida, representing migrant farmworkers in employment discrimination cases and cases brought under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (AWPA) and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Most recently, she worked at another employee rights law firm for two years. She is bilingual in English and Spanish, and Ms. Silva has dedicated her career to advocating for individuals affected by discrimination, harassment or retaliation.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Accommodating a Burned-Out Lawyer Without Creating the Adverse Action: Counseling the Law Firm | Adria Lynn Silva | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

When a lawyer discloses burnout or anxiety, often with a trial weeks away, a firm must make coverage, notice, and essential-function calls quickly. This session covers whether the lawyer is an employee or an owner under Clackamas and Lemon, how partners count toward the 15-employee threshold, and when “burnout” becomes a disability disclosure after Way. It addresses whether billables, trial availability, and client responsiveness are essential functions, how to reduce a caseload without creating an adverse reassignment after Muldrow, Herkert, and Scheer, and how to handle medical information and leave in a firm without a human resources department. Attendees leave with a decision tree and an annotated reduced-caseload agreement.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm 

SESSION 2 – Defending the Law Firm Against a Lawyer’s Disability Charge, From Position Statement to Settlement | Adria Lynn Silva | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session follows a lawyer’s disability charge against a firm from the first notice through settlement, built on the Brosy and Doe filings and the Way and Herkert retaliation holdings. It covers choosing the forum and building the defense claim by claim, preserving the records plaintiff’s counsel reads first, and drafting the position statement when partners are the witnesses. It addresses retaliation risk from timing, reassignment, and a reference freeze, and how notice, awareness, and consent-to-settle provisions shape an EPLI tender. The session closes with settlement terms a law firm can actually enforce. Attendees leave with a preservation and insurance-tender checklist and an annotated position statement outline.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Thu, November 19, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal Fri, November 20, 2026
Live Webcast