Ms. Silva is an attorney at Sass Law Firm with over 25 years of experience in labor and employment law matters, representing employees suffering discrimination and harassment based on age, disability, family status, gender/sex, marital status, national origin, pregnancy, race, religion, and sexual orientation.
Live Video-Broadcast: January 12, 2027
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
A burnout disclosure can become a disability claim against your own firm
Since Muldrow v. City of St. Louis lowered the harm needed to challenge a job reassignment, a reduced docket can itself be an adverse action. Lawyers have begun suing their own firms for disability discrimination and retaliation. Disability-accommodation suits rose about 42 percent in 2025, with mental-health requests named as a driver.
Treat “burnout” as ordinary stress, and Way shows how little a disclosure needs to put the firm on notice. Cut the docket with the lawyer’s consent, and Herkert shows consent alone may not protect you. Freeze references after the charge, and the Brosy complaint shows the retaliation count that follows. Give notice to the carrier too late, and the EPLI policy may deny coverage.
You walk out with a decision tree for the first calls after a disclosure, sample accommodation language, a preservation and insurance-tender checklist, and an annotated position statement outline. These are judgment calls that turn on each firm’s partnership agreement, policies, and records.
Key topics to be discussed:
• Employee or Owner
How the Clackamas factors and Lemon decide whether a lawyer is an employee or an owner, and whether the firm meets the 15-employee threshold.
How an informal burnout or anxiety disclosure becomes notice of a disability, and how to handle medical information and leave in a firm without a human resources department.
How billables, trial availability, and client responsiveness fare as essential functions, and how to reduce a caseload without creating an adverse reassignment.
How to choose the forum, preserve the records plaintiff’s counsel reads first, and draft a position statement when the witnesses are partners.
How timing, reassignment, and a reference freeze build a retaliation claim, and how temporal gaps are measured under Way and Herkert.
How notice, awareness, and consent-to-settle provisions shape an EPLI tender, and which settlement terms a law firm can actually enforce.
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: January 12, 2027
Closed-captioning available
Adria Lynn Silva, Attorney | Sass Law Firm
Ms. Silva is an attorney at Sass Law Firm with over 25 years of experience in labor and employment law matters, representing employees suffering discrimination and harassment based on age, disability, family status, gender/sex, marital status, national origin, pregnancy, race, religion, and sexual orientation. She has extensive experience representing students and employees in Title IX claims against high schools, vocational schools, and universities, regarding a variety of issues including claims of pregnancy discrimination, access to athletics, equal pay, harassment, and retaliation.
Ms. Silva graduated from the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Miami School of Law. Ms. Silva is licensed to practice in the United States Supreme Court, the State of Florida, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
She currently serves as a Board Member of the National Employment Lawyers Association and is the NELA Vice President of Affiliate Relations. In 2025, Ms. Silva was elected to the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers and is serving on the Executive Council of the Florida Bar Labor and Employment Section. Ms. Silva previously served on the executive board of the Florida Chapter of the National Employment Lawyers Association (Florida NELA) for seven years and served as the President in 2009-2010. Ms. Silva was the 2012-2013 President of the Thomas S. Biggs American Inn of Court (now Michael R. N. McDonnell American Inn of Court) and is currently serving on the Inn executive board.
Ms. Silva often speaks on various topics in employment and Title IX law and contributed to a book, The Pregnancy Discrimination Act: A Guide for the Plaintiff’s Employment Lawyer, on pregnancy discrimination regarding Title IX and pregnancy.
In addition to her employment and Title IX practice, Ms. Silva has represented homeowners and tenants under the Fair Housing Act and customers and patrons in cases of discrimination in places of public accommodation.
Before joining Sass Law Firm, Ms. Silva spent years in her own private practice representing students and employees in discrimination, retaliation and harassment cases. She began her legal career with Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc. in Immokalee, Florida, representing migrant farmworkers in employment discrimination cases and cases brought under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (AWPA) and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Most recently, she worked at another employee rights law firm for two years. She is bilingual in English and Spanish, and Ms. Silva has dedicated her career to advocating for individuals affected by discrimination, harassment or retaliation.
SESSION 1 – Accommodating a Burned-Out Lawyer Without Creating the Adverse Action: Counseling the Law Firm | Adria Lynn Silva | 12:00pm – 1:00pm
When a lawyer discloses burnout or anxiety, often with a trial weeks away, a firm must make coverage, notice, and essential-function calls quickly. This session covers whether the lawyer is an employee or an owner under Clackamas and Lemon, how partners count toward the 15-employee threshold, and when “burnout” becomes a disability disclosure after Way. It addresses whether billables, trial availability, and client responsiveness are essential functions, how to reduce a caseload without creating an adverse reassignment after Muldrow, Herkert, and Scheer, and how to handle medical information and leave in a firm without a human resources department. Attendees leave with a decision tree and an annotated reduced-caseload agreement.
BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm
SESSION 2 – Defending the Law Firm Against a Lawyer’s Disability Charge, From Position Statement to Settlement | Adria Lynn Silva | 1:10pm – 2:10pm
This session follows a lawyer’s disability charge against a firm from the first notice through settlement, built on the Brosy and Doe filings and the Way and Herkert retaliation holdings. It covers choosing the forum and building the defense claim by claim, preserving the records plaintiff’s counsel reads first, and drafting the position statement when partners are the witnesses. It addresses retaliation risk from timing, reassignment, and a reference freeze, and how notice, awareness, and consent-to-settle provisions shape an EPLI tender. The session closes with settlement terms a law firm can actually enforce. Attendees leave with a preservation and insurance-tender checklist and an annotated position statement outline.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General