Why Mediation Fails and How to Fix It: A Strategic, Political, and Practical Approach to Case Resolution

Reuben Guttman
Reuben Guttman
Guttman, Buschner & Brooks PLLC

Reuben Guttman is a founding member of Guttman & Buschner, PLLC where – in addition to mediating cases - his practice involves civil rights, whistleblowers, class actions and complex litigation. The International Business Times has referred to him as “one of the world’s most prominent whistleblower attorneys.”

John Harrison
John Harrison
Evans Harrison Hackett PLLC

John Harrison has been in the private practice of law in Chattanooga, Tennessee for over 45 years. His practice consists of representing clients in litigation involving discrimination claims, retaliation claims, wrongful discharge claims, employment contracts, and employment torts.

Live Video-Broadcast: January 23, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Whether through settlement, or adjudication, all disputes have an end point. Sometimes the litigation process is necessary to help the parties find that end point but often a neutral, or mediatory, is necessary to navigate the politics of the dispute which are often tempered by economics, emotions, and the dynamics of decision making inherent in institutional plaintiffs or defendants. At some point, parties in dispute find themselves asking this question about their opposition: “what’s really going on behind the scenes and who is calling or influencing the shots?” The problem, of course, is that the influences may be subtle, subconscious, or not otherwise clear the parties themselves. This 2-hour program will focus on the politics of mediation as a process to resolve cases; narrow issues in dispute; or gain insight into the relevant facts that will decide the case. The program will answer questions about the politics of mediation, and provide a contemporary perspective, setting the tone for a less adversarial process and one designed to reach a business solution.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Where does the client need to end up?
  • Which cases are best suited for mediation?
  • What are the politics governing settlement?
  • When is it time to mediate?
  • How do you select a mediator?
  • The formats for mediation?
  • Cutting the issues?
  • The role of counsel and clients?
  • Mediation as a fact-finding mechanism?
  • Mediation as a settlement process?

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: January 23, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Reuben Guttman | Guttman, Buschner & Brooks PLLC

Reuben Guttman is a founding member of Guttman& Buschner, PLLC where – in addition to mediating cases – his practice involves civil rights, whistleblowers, class actions and complex litigation. The International Business Times has referred to him as “one of the world’s most prominent whistleblower attorneys.” Citing “wins recouping billions of dollars for the federal and state governments,” STAT News referred to him as the “The Lawyer Pharma Loves to Hate.”

Guttman has represented workers, unions, and pension funds in complex litigation. For over a decade, he served as the chief outside counsel to the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, in a series of labor and environmental cases that enhanced safety and environmental conditions at Manhattan Project nuclear weapons sites while driving dread disease compensation legislation for nuclear weapons workers across the nation. In 2020, he served as lead counsel in a federal class action lawsuit against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and secured a consent order mandating Hepatitis C testing and treatment for 17,000 inmates. His defense work has included First Amendment work for a newspaper group and jury trial civil fraud defense.

Guttman is currently a faculty member of the American University School of Public Affairs where he teaches Equal Protection/Civil Rights, and he has been an Adjunct Professor at Emory Law School and a Senior Fellow at Emory Law’s Center for Advocacy and Dispute Resolution. He is a Founder and Senior Advisor to the Emory Corporate Governance and Accountability Review (ECGAR). He is the 2015 recipient of the Emory Law Alumni Service Award. He has taught trial advocacy and complex case investigations in the United States, China, and Mexico, and he has co-authored three case files – two published by Emory Law and one published by the National Institute of Trial Advocacy where he is a faculty member.

He is co-author (with J.C. Lore III of Rutgers Law) of the textbook, Pretrial Advocacy (Wolters Kluwer Spring, 2021). He is a chapter co-author (with Traci Buschner) and wrote the introduction for Remote Advocacy: A Guide to Survive and Thrive (Wolters Kluwer and National Institute of Trial Advocacy, 2020). He is co-author of False Claims Act: Representing the Plaintiffs (LEXIS/NEXIS Practice Guide, 2025). Guttman has written or co-authored more than 100 articles or opinion pieces and multiple book chapters and law review pieces. He has been a columnist for Law360 where he writes on litigation and politics, and he has been a columnist for the Global Legal Post.

His article, Pharmaceutical Regulation in the United States; a Confluence of Influences, was translated and published in Mandarin in the Peking University Public Interest Law Journal, Vol 1, Page 187 (2010). Guttman is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation; he is past member of the Board of Directors of the American Constitution Society (ACS) where he is currently a member of the ACS Board of Advisors. Guttman received his JD from Emory University and his BA in American History from the University of Rochester. He is the founder of www.whistleblowerlaws.com.

He began his legal career as a Washington DC counsel for the Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, where he served for five years. Guttman is licensed to practice in front of The United States Supreme Court and in the states of Georgia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the District of Columbia.

 

John Harrison | Evans Harrison Hackett PLLC

John Harrison has been in the private practice of law in Chattanooga, Tennessee for over 45 years. His practice consists of representing clients in litigation involving discrimination claims, retaliation claims, wrongful discharge claims, employment contracts, and employment torts; advising clients on employment and labor law compliance; representing clients in general business and commercial litigation; and representing management in union matters, including union avoidance, unfair labor practice charges, labor organizing efforts, union representation elections, collective bargaining, strikes, and labor arbitrations.

John has been listed in The Best Lawyers in America® in Labor and Employment Law since 2007. John is listed in Mid-South Super Lawyers® in Employment & Labor, Employment Litigation: Defense, and Alternative Dispute Resolution. John is a Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 31-Listed General Civil Mediator. John is a Master in the Ray L. Brock and Robert E. Cooper American Inn of Court.

Agenda

I. Where does the client need to end up? | 1:00pm – 1:12pm

II. Which cases are best suited for mediation? | 1:12pm – 1:24pm

III. What are the politics governing settlement? | 1:24pm – 1:36pm

IV. When is it time to mediate? | 1:36pm – 1:48pm

V. How do you select a mediator? | 1:48pm – 2:00pm

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

VI. The formats for mediation? | 2:10pm – 2:22pm

VII. Cutting the issues? | 2:22pm – 2:34pm

VIII. The role of counsel and clients? | 2:34pm – 2:46pm

IX. Mediation as a fact-finding mechanism? | 2:46pm – 2:58pm

X. Mediation as a settlement process? | 2:58pm – 3:10pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI-Powered Litigator: Real Tools, Real Cases, Real Results
The AI-Powered Litigator: Real Tools, Real Cases, Real Results Tue, December 30, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Video Game Law for the Non-Game Lawyer
Video Game Law for the Non-Game Lawyer Wed, January 7, 2026
Live Webcast
Wine, Spirits and Beer Law 101 (2026 Edition)
Wine, Spirits and Beer Law 101 (2026 Edition) Wed, January 21, 2026
Live Webcast