Trademark Enforcement Tactics: Strategies for Business Success

Paul W, Reidl
Paul W, Reidl
DP&F Law

Paul is a frequent litigator before Federal courts and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. He has also been retained as an expert witness on numerous occasions. He is also a frequent speaker and writer on trademark and wine issues, having published or spoken nearly seventy times in his career.

R. David Donoghue
R. David Donoghue
Holland & Knight

R. David Donoghue is an established intellectual property (IP) trial attorney with jury trial success and a strong track record across district courts. Mr. Donoghue advises clients from major corporations and midsize businesses on technology disputes such as patent, trade secret, trademark, copyright and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

Live Video-Broadcast: June 27, 2025

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I - Risk management and brand strategy – Paul W. Reidl

The first part of this program explores how to protect the value of trademark assets: Best practices, risk management techniques, and how recent trademark case law influences brand strategy, risk management and business development. Participants will gain a deeper understanding of evolving legal standards around brand protection, including trade dress protection, fair use, and trademark dilution. The presenter will discuss how they can strengthen their trademark portfolio, minimize the risk of costly litigation, and identify new market positioning opportunities. This is designed for IP attorneys, in-house counsel, brand managers, and legal advisors, who have a basic understanding of trademark law. It will provide actionable insights into the intersection of law and business.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Risk management strategies for the trademark portfolio
  • Key trademark litigation trends from recent federal court decisions
  • Impact of evolving case law on risk management
  • Practical application of fair use, parody, and descriptive term defenses
  • How businesses can lawfully capitalize on weakened or genericized marks

Session II - The art of enforcement: Practical playbooks for trademark protection – R. David Donoghue

As trademark case law continues to evolve, effective enforcement demands more than legal awareness— it requires a strategic blend of precision and adaptability. This second session delves into how litigators and brand advisors can translate legal developments into actionable enforcement strategies across all stages: Pre-dispute, litigation, and resolution.

Designed for practitioners who want more than a theoretical review, this program offers real-world guidance on crafting impactful cease-and-desist letters, conducting targeted pre-litigation investigations, building persuasive litigation narratives, and aligning enforcement efforts with broader business objectives.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Trademark enforcement tactics that work
  • Litigation decision-making
  • Building the enforcement case
  • Litigation-proofing your brand
  • Private resolution vs. public litigation

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: June 27, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Speaker_Paul W, Reidl_FedBarPaul W, Reidl | DP&F Law

Paul Reidl has been practicing law for 45 years, representing clients in trademark matters in both the United States and overseas. He is a frequent litigator before Federal courts and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. He has also been retained as an expert witness on numerous occasions.

Paul joined the Intellectual Property group of Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty as Of Counsel in February 2022. He had a very diverse career before that: thirteen years of solo practice; Associate General Counsel with the largest wine company in the world, E. & J. Gallo Winery, where he was responsible for their global intellectual property program; and ten years as a litigator with Crowell & Moring in Washington, D.C.

Paul is a frequent speaker and writer on trademark and wine issues, having published or spoken nearly seventy times in his career. He has been a guest lecturer on trademark law at George Washington University (“GWU”) and has conducted training sessions for USPTO Examining Attorneys.

Paul is a member of the Trademark Committee of the Biodynamic Federation of Demeter International and the Board of Directors of the United States chapter of the International Wine Lawyers’ Association (AIDV). He served in the leadership of the International Trademark Association (INTA) for many years and was its President in 2006.

Paul received his B.A. (in political science and speech communication, with a minor in theology) in 1977 and a J.D. in 1980 from GWU where he was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and the Law Review. While in law school, he taught Speech Communication at GWU for three years.

 

Speaker_R. David Donoghue_FedBarR. David Donoghue | Holland & Knight

R. David Donoghue is an established intellectual property (IP) trial attorney with jury trial success and a strong track record across district courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). He serves as the leader of Holland & Knight’s National Intellectual Property Group and is based in the firm’s Chicago office.

Mr. Donoghue advises clients from major corporations and midsize businesses on technology disputes such as patent, trade secret, trademark, copyright and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). Mr. Donoghue has been recommended in Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) Patent 1000 since 2014. A recent publication describes him as “A practical lawyer who gets right to the heart of any matter, David Donoghue really understands the most technical aspects of patent law. He is also great at figuring out how to win cases without spending a shedload of his clients’ money.” He provides strong leadership to Holland & Knight’s national IP group.

Whether he is asserting his client’s IP, defending against competitors or fending off Non-Practicing Entities (NPE), Mr. Donoghue blends his deep litigation experience with practical business insight garnered from his in-house experience. As a founding member of Aptiv’s (f/k/a Delphi) Technology Licensing and Litigation Group, he handled substantial international IP litigation and licensing matters.

In addition to his legal practice, Mr. Donoghue has served as an adjunct professor at the Loyola University Chicago School of Law, teaching legal research, writing and IP courses. At the beginning of his legal career, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Gordon J. Quist, federal district judge for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan.

Mr. Donoghue is also the founder and principle author of the Chicago IP Litigation and Retail Patent Litigation blogs.

Agenda

Session I – Risk management and brand strategy | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • Risk management strategies for the trademark portfolio
  • Key trademark litigation trends from recent federal court decisions
  • Impact of evolving case law on risk management
  • Practical application of fair use, parody, and descriptive term defenses
  • How businesses can lawfully capitalize on weakened or genericized  marks

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – The art of enforcement: Practical playbooks for trademark protection | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Trademark enforcement tactics that work
  • Litigation decision-making
  • Building the enforcement case
  • Litigation-proofing your brand
  • Private resolution vs. public litigation

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Real Estate LLC Disputes
Real Estate LLC Disputes Wed, April 23, 2025
Live Webcast
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition)
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
Live Webcast
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition)
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Tue, April 29, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition)
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition) Wed, April 30, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay