Mass Tort Settlement Architecture: Protecting Vulnerable Claimants, Avoiding Distribution Delays, and Reducing Counsel’s Exposure

Michele P. Fuller
Michele P. Fuller
Michigan Law Center, PLLC

Michele P. Fuller is the founding attorney of The Architected Settlement Law Group, a division of Michigan Law Center, PLLC, and President of Advocacy, Inc., a nonprofit professional trustee organization that administers stand-alone special needs and settlement trusts. Since 1997 she has practiced at the intersection of public benefits, special needs trust drafting and administration, settlement planning, and fiduciary trusteeship.

Kevin Urbatsch
Kevin Urbatsch
The Urbatsch Law Firm, P.C

Kevin Urbatsch is the principal attorney of The Urbatsch Law Firm, P.C. in Berkeley, California, where he specializes in special needs, estate, and settlement planning. He has practiced law for over 30 years and has represented clients in establishing and administering hundreds of special needs trusts throughout California and the United States.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 16, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Second Injury Lands After the Case Is Won

Mass tort settlement infrastructure moves money fast and tracks liens well. It was never built to ask whether the claimant can actually keep the check. Every claimant list holds minors and adults without legal capacity. It also holds people who depend on Medicaid, SSI, SNAP, HUD assistance, or VA benefits.

For these claimants, a lump sum is a trigger, not relief. One deposit can suspend essential benefits and force an immediate spend-down. Left unaddressed, the gap delays global distributions and spawns guardianship and conservatorship proceedings. Complaints arrive after the work is done. Model Rules 1.1, 1.4, and 1.14 place that exposure squarely on the attorney.

This program delivers settlement architecture built before approval, not damage control after. Attendees leave with an intake triage system and a Qualified Settlement Fund playbook under I.R.C. 468B. A decision framework matches special needs trusts, ABLE accounts, and periodic payments to each claimant. Vendor vetting tools and a multi-jurisdiction approval checklist complete the workflow. Faculty proved it on a class settlement protecting more than fifty vulnerable claimants.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Second Injury
    Benefit loss, spend-down, and attorney duty exposure under Model Rules 1.1, 1.4, 1.14.
  • Claimant Triage
    Repeatable intake screening that flags minors, incapacitated adults, and benefits recipients.
  • QSF Sequencing
    Using I.R.C. 468B funds to buy planning time and avoid constructive receipt.
  • Trust Selection
    Matching SNTs, pooled trusts, ABLE accounts, and structured payments to each claimant.
  • Vendor Vetting
    Exposing referral fees, revenue sharing, and undisclosed conflicts behind settlement advisers.
  • Scaled Approval
    Multi-jurisdiction court routing without individual conservatorships, plus a repeatable implementation checklist.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 16, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Michele P. Fuller, Attorney and Counselor at Law | Michigan Law Center, PLLC

Michele P. Fuller is the founding attorney of The Architected Settlement Law Group, a division of Michigan Law Center, PLLC, and President of Advocacy, Inc., a nonprofit professional trustee organization that administers standalone special needs and settlement trusts. Since 1997 she has practiced at the intersection of public benefits, special needs trust drafting and administration, settlement planning, and fiduciary trusteeship.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Fuller earned her Juris Doctor from the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law and her Bachelor of Arts in International Relations from James Madison College at Michigan State University. She has been admitted to practice law in Michigan since 1997.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Fuller is a Fellow of the Academy of Court-Appointed Neutrals, where she is the only member practicing in special needs and public benefits settlement planning. She received the 2018 State Bar of Michigan Unsung Hero Award and has been selected to Super Lawyers annually since 2018. Lawyer’s Monthly Magazine named her the Women-in-Law Elder Law and Special Needs Planning Attorney of the Year in 2016, and Parenting Magazine named her a Top Special Needs Child Advocate in 2013.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Fuller is a former Chair of the Elder Law and Disability Rights Section of the State Bar of Michigan, an Advisory Board Member of the Academy of Special Needs Planners, a member of the Board of Directors of the Michigan Chapter of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, a member of the Elder Law and Special Needs Advisory Board of the Institute for Continuing Legal Education, and an active member of the Michigan Association for Justice. She co-hosts the Special Needs Planning Symposium, held every February in Napa, California, and the Great Lakes Special Needs Planning Symposium, held annually since 2021.

  • Experience

Ms. Fuller served as Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Michigan from 2019 to 2020, architecting the settlement process for minor and legally incapacitated claimants in the $600 million Flint Water Cases. She also advocated on behalf of the minor patient claimants in the $13 million Hawthorn class action. Her books, co-authored with Kevin Urbatsch, include Administering the Michigan Special Needs Trust, Administering the California Special Needs Trust, and Special Needs Trusts: Protect Your Child’s Financial Future. Her article on architecting settlements for vulnerable clients is forthcoming in the Michigan Bar Journal, and she has contributed articles to Trial Magazine, Elder Law Answers, NAELA News, and the MAJ Journal.

 

Kevin Urbatsch, Esq., Principal Attorney | The Urbatsch Law Firm, P.C

Kevin Urbatsch is the principal attorney of The Urbatsch Law Firm, P.C. in Berkeley, California, where he specializes in special needs, estate, and settlement planning. He has practiced law for over 30 years and has represented clients in establishing and administering hundreds of special needs trusts throughout California and the United States.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Urbatsch received his law degree from St. Louis University in 1993 and his undergraduate degree from Truman State University in 1988. He has been a member of the California Bar since 1993 and is a Certified Specialist in Estate Planning, Trust, and Probate Law by the California State Bar.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Urbatsch is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) and serves as the National Director of the Academy of Special Needs Planners, leading over 500 professionals dedicated to enhancing the lives of individuals with disabilities. He served over five years as Editor-in-Chief of the NAELA Journal, received NAELA’s Presidential Recognition Award in 2011 for his work in special needs planning, was named one of the nation’s Top Child Advocates by Parenting Magazine in 2013, and has been repeatedly selected as a Northern California Super Lawyer.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Urbatsch is a member of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, the Bar Association of San Francisco Probate and Trust Section, and the State Bar of California Trust and Estate Section, as well as the Consumer Attorneys of California, the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association, and the Alameda/Contra Costa Trial Lawyers Association. He hosts the annual California Special Needs Planning Symposium, a three-day event for attorneys, financial advisors, and professional fiduciaries.

  • Experience

Mr. Urbatsch has written or co-authored leading texts in the field, including Special Needs Trusts: Protecting Your Child’s Financial Future (10th edition, 2023) and Administering the California Special Needs Trust (4th edition, 2026), and serves as the Attorney-Editor of CEB’s Special Needs Trusts: Planning, Drafting, and Administration. A frequent speaker, he has presented at over 150 seminars nationwide, taught courses for the bench and for fiduciaries, and served as an expert witness internationally, with certified expert testimony in Alameda County and in Great Britain. He began his California practice as a litigator handling elder financial abuse, Americans with Disabilities Act public access, and trust and estate litigation matters.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The Settlement Blind Spot: Why Vulnerable Claimants Can Derail Distribution | 1:00pm – 1:15pm

Ordinary settlement infrastructure was not designed to protect every claimant. An unrestricted payment can cause benefit loss, court intervention, or an immediate spend-down, trigger duties under Model Rules 1.1, 1.4, and 1.14, and delay the entire settlement.

SESSION 2 – Find Them Early: A Scalable Claimant-Triage System | 1:15pm – 1:35pm

This segment builds a scalable triage system: intake questions that identify minors, incapacitated adults, and public-benefits recipients, red flags hidden in medical and claimant-communication records, handling nonresponsive claimants, and escalation categories that replace one-size-fits-all processing.

SESSION 3 – Buy Time Without Delaying the Settlement: QSFs and Distribution Sequencing | 1:35pm – 1:50pm

A Qualified Settlement Fund can separate defendant finality from claimant-level planning. Attendees learn to avoid constructive receipt, pay ordinary claims while complex cases remain in planning, and define responsibilities among attorneys, administrators, and planners.

SESSION 4 – Choose the Right Solution: SNTs, Pooled Trusts, ABLE Accounts, and Structured Payments | 1:50pm – 2:00pm

A rapid decision framework matches solutions to age, capacity, benefits, recovery size, and timing: when ABLE is enough, when a pooled trust beats a standalone trust, drafting and funding mistakes that destroy eligibility, and avoiding unnecessary guardianships.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 5 – Follow the Money: Vendor Conflicts, Fees, and Fiduciary Risk | 2:10pm – 2:30pm

This segment follows the money: who pays the adviser, referral fees, revenue sharing, proprietary products, and affiliated trustees. Attendees learn to evaluate insurance, organizational stability, investment results, and total costs, and to build a defensible RFP-based selection process.

SESSION 6 – Scaling the Solution: Court Approval Across Multiple Jurisdictions | 2:30pm – 2:50pm

Scaling approval across jurisdictions: next friends, guardians ad litem, and court-appointed neutrals, standardized orders with enumerated authority, state-by-state minor-settlement requirements, and routing exceptions without opening thousands of separate proceedings.

SESSION 7 – Two Settlements, Two Outcomes—and the Checklist for Your Next Case | 2:50pm – 3:10pm

The program closes with two case studies: one process that protected more than fifty vulnerable claimants and closed on schedule, and one that failed. Attendees leave with a repeatable workflow and a final implementation checklist.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General Hours

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars