Structuring Severance: Tax Characterization and Unemployment Benefit Consequences of Separation Pay

Marshall Mort
Lauren M. Hoye
Christophe Delrieu
Marshall Mort | Fenwick & West LLP
Lauren M. Hoye | Willig, Williams & Davidson
Christophe Delrieu | Fenwick & West LLP

Live Video-Broadcast: October 5, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Same Severance Dollar Is Taxed, Reported, and Offset Differently Depending on How You Draft It

Separation pay is never one thing for tax or benefit purposes. Federal law characterizes severance and settlement payments, allocates them between W-2 and 1099 reporting, and subjects them to FICA. Code Section 409A dictates how the payments must be structured, and accelerating equity in a separation adds requirements of its own. Pennsylvania and New Jersey take different approaches to whether severance reduces unemployment compensation.

Mislabel a payment and the W-2 versus 1099 allocation and reporting obligations follow the label. Structure severance outside Section 409A and the arrangement fails. Accelerate equity without meeting the separation requirements and the tax result turns adverse. Draft the release language, payment structure, labeling, or separation date carelessly and the departing employee’s unemployment benefits are offset under Pennsylvania’s rule — or, in New Jersey, may not be reduced at all. Filing timing, lump sum versus installments, and WARN Act pay all move the outcome.

You leave able to identify the drafting failures that produce adverse tax results, structure separation benefits to comply with Section 409A, and recognize which severance-classification model your state follows — with practical guidance on release language, payment structure, labeling, and separation dates, and a clear read on when local counsel is needed.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Tax Characterization of Separation Pay
    How the federal tax characterization of severance and settlement payments, the taxability of separation benefits, and the FICA treatment of separation pay determine the tax result before a single dollar is paid.
  • W-2 vs. 1099 Allocation
    Applying the allocation mechanics that decide whether a payment is reported on a W-2 or a 1099, and meeting the reporting obligations that follow from that allocation.
  • Section 409A and Accelerated Equity
    Structuring severance benefits to comply with Code Section 409A and satisfying the unique requirements involved when accelerating equity awards in a separation context.
  • Common Drafting Pitfalls
    Identifying the mistakes in separation agreements and structures that produce adverse tax results, and the drafting corrections that avoid them.
  • UC Offset Models: Pennsylvania and New Jersey
    Recognizing the different models states use to classify severance for unemployment compensation purposes, working through Pennsylvania’s severance offset rule and its calculation mechanics and New Jersey’s rules on when severance does — and does not — reduce benefits, and knowing when local counsel is needed.
  • Drafting Levers and Client Counseling
    Using release language, payment structure, labeling, and separation dates to shift UC outcomes, and advising clients on filing timing, lump sum versus installments, and WARN Act pay.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 5, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Marshall Mort, Partner | Fenwick & West LLP

Marshall Mort is a partner in the corporate group at Fenwick & West LLP in Silicon Valley, where his practice centers on executive compensation and employee benefits — the discipline in which severance packages, separation agreements, and change-in-control arrangements are designed and taxed. A Chambers-ranked practitioner and frequent speaker on Section 409A deferred compensation compliance — the tax regime that dictates how separation pay must be structured, timed, and characterized — he brings exactly the technical command this program demands.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Mort earned his J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, where he was elected to the Order of the Coif, and his B.S. and B.A., magna cum laude, in Accounting, English, and French from Santa Clara University — an accounting foundation that anchors his tax-driven compensation practice. He is admitted to the California Bar.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Mort has been ranked by Chambers USA for Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation every year from 2023 through 2026, was named to The Best Lawyers in America “Ones to Watch” list for Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, and was recognized as a Northern California Super Lawyers Rising Star in Employee Benefits from 2014 to 2021. He is a frequent presenter on Section 409A deferred compensation compliance and equity compensation design for accredited programs and industry audiences.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Mort advises companies at every stage — from venture-backed startups to public companies — on the design, tax treatment, and compliance of compensation and benefits arrangements, including the deferred compensation rules under Section 409A that govern when and how separation pay can be promised and paid. His practice spans the technology, life sciences, fintech, games, and AI sectors, where workforce transitions and executive separations are a constant feature of the deal landscape.

  • Experience

Mr. Mort has handled the compensation and benefits dimensions of some of the market’s most significant transactions — including Wiz’s $32 billion acquisition by Google, Figma’s proposed $20 billion combination with Adobe, and WhatsApp’s $19 billion acquisition by Facebook — deals in which the treatment of employee separation pay, accelerated equity, and severance obligations carries enormous tax consequences. That transactional depth, paired with his 409A expertise, makes him uniquely positioned to walk attendees through the tax characterization of separation pay and the drafting choices that determine its treatment.

 

Lauren M. Hoye, Partner | Willig, Williams & Davidson

Lauren M. Hoye is a partner at Willig, Williams & Davidson in Philadelphia, where she represents labor unions and employees in courts, arbitrations, negotiations, and administrative proceedings — including hundreds of unemployment compensation cases at every level in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Her front-line command of how separation pay actually affects a worker’s eligibility for unemployment benefits supplies the perspective at the heart of this program: what severance structuring means for the employees who receive it.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Hoye earned her J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, where she was elected to the Order of the Coif; her M.S.W. from Washington University in St. Louis; and her B.A., with honors, from Grinnell College. She is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Middle Districts of Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Hoye was named 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” for Labor Law – Union in Philadelphia by The Best Lawyers in America©, has been recognized by Best Lawyers since 2024, and has been selected to the Pennsylvania Super Lawyers list every year since 2021 after six years on its Rising Stars list. She is a frequent speaker and instructor for the American Bar Association, the Pennsylvania Bar Institute, the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board and Bureau of Mediation, the AFL-CIO Union Lawyers Alliance, and the Labor and Employment Relations Association.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Hoye serves as an arbitrator in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas compulsory arbitration program and has been a board member of the AFL-CIO Lawyers Coordinating Committee since 2010. She is an active member of the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and American Bar Associations, and volunteers with the Support Center for Child Advocates representing abused children in the child welfare system.

  • Experience

In more than fifteen years advocating for workers and their unions, Ms. Hoye has handled hundreds of unemployment compensation cases before referees, boards of review, and the appellate courts of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, alongside employee benefits matters and litigation through the Third Circuit and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. She knows firsthand how severance characterization, allocation, and timing determine whether a separated worker keeps or loses unemployment benefits — making her uniquely positioned to show attendees the benefit consequences that flow from every separation pay structuring decision.

 

Christophe Delrieu, Associate | Fenwick & West LLP

Christophe Delrieu is an associate in the corporate group at Fenwick & West LLP in Silicon Valley, where he advises on a broad range of executive compensation and employee benefits matters for clients in the technology and life sciences industries. Trained in corporate and tax law and seasoned in-house in the tax department of Oracle, he approaches severance and separation pay from the tax side first — precisely the lens this program applies to the characterization and benefit consequences of separation pay.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Delrieu earned his J.D. in Corporate and Tax Law from Paris University and a master’s degree from HEC Paris School of Management, one of Europe’s premier business schools. He is admitted to the California Bar and is fluent in French and Spanish.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Delrieu brings a distinctive cross-border perspective to compensation work, having practiced at major French law firms and served in the tax department of Oracle before joining Fenwick — a combination of private-practice and in-house tax experience that gives him firsthand insight into how employers actually analyze, report, and defend the tax treatment of compensation arrangements, including separation pay.

  • Professional Involvement

At Fenwick, Mr. Delrieu supports companies across the technology and life sciences sectors on the design and tax treatment of compensation and benefits arrangements, from equity programs to the agreements that govern executive and employee separations. His client work has included representations of companies such as Stripe, FORT Robotics, CesiumAstro, Scribe Therapeutics, and Kentik in corporate transactions and public offerings.

  • Experience

Mr. Delrieu’s practice sits at the junction of corporate transactions, compensation design, and tax — the three disciplines that converge in every severance package. His formal tax training, in-house experience at one of the world’s largest technology companies, and current focus on executive compensation and employee benefits make him well positioned to break down how separation pay is characterized for tax purposes and how structuring choices ripple into withholding, reporting, and unemployment benefit outcomes.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Taxing Severance and Settlement Pay: Characterization, Allocation, and Reporting | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session covers the federal tax characterization of severance and settlement payments, the allocation mechanics that determine W-2 versus 1099 reporting, and the FICA treatment of separation pay. Attorneys will learn about the taxability of severance benefits, and how to structure such payments to comply with Code Section 409A. Attorneys will also learn about the unique requirements involved when accelerating equity awards in a separation context. Participants will leave able to identify common drafting failures that produce adverse tax results.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Severance and Unemployment Benefits: Drafting Separation Agreements Around UC Offset Rules — Lessons from Pennsylvania and New Jersey | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session examines how unemployment compensation offset rules interact with severance pay and how attorneys can structure separation agreements to minimize adverse UC consequences for departing employees. Using Pennsylvania and New Jersey—two neighboring states with different approaches to severance—as its working case studies, the session walks through how severance is classified and offset in each state and the drafting levers that can shift outcomes. A brief overview of the various approaches to severance pay as it relates to unemployment compensation will allow attendees in other jurisdictions to recognize which model their state follows, and know when local counsel is needed. Attorneys will leave with practical guidance to achieve best outcomes for their clients.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast