Title IX for the Non-Specialist: Representing Students and Employees in Campus Proceedings Under the 2020 Rules

Sean H. Sobel
Sean H. Sobel | Sobel Law Solutions, LLC

Sean H. Sobel is the Founding Attorney of Sobel Law Solutions, LLC, a Cleveland, Ohio firm he launched in March 2026 after more than fifteen years practicing employment and civil rights law at a large national firm and a Cleveland boutique practice.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 17, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The process is not court, and many schools are still running it on outdated policies

Most lawyers meet Title IX when a client calls because a son or daughter has been accused or has made a report at school. The 2020 Rules are the framework now in effect after the January 2025 vacatur of the 2024 rule, yet many schools still work from outdated policies. The process moves fast, the rules differ from court, and early mistakes are hard to undo.

The stakes arrive in the first 72 hours. Miss the interim measures, no-contact directives, and emergency removals, and the client’s position is set before the file is read. Misjudge the advisor’s role at a college or university hearing, and the live cross-examination goes unprepared. Treat the campus matter in isolation, and criminal investigations, civil claims, and consequences for faculty and staff follow. Overlook the appeal, and a campus decision that could support a lawsuit goes unchallenged.

Attorney Sean H. Sobel, who has handled Title IX matters as advisor, investigator, hearing officer, and federal litigator, walks practitioners through the framework from first notice through appeal. Attendees leave with a plan for the first 72 hours, a practical approach to evidence review and live hearings, and the ethics guardrails for confidentiality, parents, and non-lawyer advisors.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Where Title IX Stands
    Where Title IX stands in 2026 after the January 2025 vacatur of the 2024 rule, and why many schools are still working from outdated policies.
  • The First 72 Hours
    How to respond to interim measures, no-contact directives, and emergency removals before early mistakes become hard to undo.
  • Advisors and Live Hearings
    The advisor’s role, evidence review, and live hearings with cross-examination at colleges and universities.
  • Parallel Exposure
    How criminal investigations, civil claims, and consequences for faculty and staff run alongside the campus proceeding.
  • Appeals and Lawsuits
    How to build the appeal and recognize when a campus decision supports a lawsuit.
  • Ethics Issues
    Confidentiality, representing a student while dealing with the parents, and working alongside non-lawyer advisors.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 17, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Sean H. Sobel, Founding Attorney | Sobel Law Solutions, LLC

Sean H. Sobel is the Founding Attorney of Sobel Law Solutions, LLC, a Cleveland, Ohio firm he launched in March 2026 after more than fifteen years practicing employment and civil rights law at a large national firm and a Cleveland boutique practice. He maintains a national Title IX practice that spans every seat at the table — serving as advisor to complainants and respondents at colleges, universities, and K-12 institutions across multiple states, conducting independent Title IX investigations and hearing-officer engagements for educational institutions, and litigating Title IX private-right-of-action and Section 1983 claims in federal court. Alongside his campus work, Sean represents Ohio employees in discrimination, sexual harassment, retaliation, FMLA, wrongful termination, severance, and non-compete matters before administrative agencies, Ohio common pleas courts, and the federal district courts. Recognized by Super Lawyers for fourteen consecutive years, his Title IX work has drawn national press coverage, and he brings to this program a practitioner’s view of how the 2020 regulations actually play out in live hearings, cross-examination, and investigations.

  • Education & Credentials

Sean earned his J.D. from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in 2010 and his B.A. in Political Science from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2007. During law school he served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Peter C. Economus of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio and as a legal intern in the Office of Federal Operations at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission — the office that adjudicates federal-sector discrimination appeals. He is admitted to practice in Ohio, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and in the U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio, and has been a member of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association since 2010.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Sean has been recognized by Super Lawyers for fourteen consecutive years, including selection to the Ohio Rising Stars list every year from 2014 through 2025 and to the full Ohio Super Lawyers list for 2026 and 2027 — a distinction reserved for no more than five percent of attorneys in the state. He holds a 10.0 “Superb” rating from Avvo, has been named one of the Three Best Rated® Top 3 Employment Lawyers in Cleveland, and received the American Institute of Legal Counsel’s Client Satisfaction Award in 2016. His Title IX representation of students and employees has generated national press coverage, and he is a published contributor to the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal, most recently co-authoring “When Severance Agreements Bar ERISA Long-Term Disability Claims” (Jan./Feb. 2026). He is a frequent speaker at accredited seminars, bar programs, and community legal town halls.

  • Professional Involvement

Sean’s Title IX practice is deliberately built on both sides of the process. He serves as an advisor to complainants and respondents in campus proceedings nationwide — preparing students, faculty, and staff for interviews, drafting written submissions and responses to investigative reports, and conducting the live cross-examination the 2020 regulations require at hearings — and he is separately retained by colleges and universities to conduct independent Title IX investigations and serve as a hearing officer. That dual vantage point gives him an unusually clear read on how decision-makers weigh evidence, where advisors win and lose credibility, and how institutional process choices create or foreclose appellate and litigation issues. Beyond the campus, Sean has been a long-standing advocate for equal access to the legal system, authoring “More Should Be Done to Ensure Deaf Individuals Have Equal Access to the Law” for the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal and presenting on deaf discrimination and barriers to effective communication, reasonable accommodations at work and school, and employee rights at programs for bar associations, the NAACP, and community audiences.

  • Experience

Sean has practiced employment and civil rights law since 2010. He began his career as an associate at Javitch, Block & Rathbone and then served as a staff attorney at BakerHostetler, one of the nation’s largest law firms, where he handled e-discovery and litigation matters and wrote on spoliation and social-media evidence for the firm’s E-Discovery Newsletter. He then moved to the employee side of the bar as an associate at The Spitz Law Firm before spending nearly a decade (2017–2026) as a Partner at Sobel, Wade & Mapley, LLC, a Cleveland employment-law boutique, where he built and led the firm’s national Title IX practice. In March 2026 he founded Sobel Law Solutions, LLC so that students, employees, and institutions facing Title IX and workplace matters could work directly with an experienced attorney from first call through hearing. Over the past five years he has handled roughly 75 Title IX matters as advisor, investigator, hearing officer, and federal litigator — experience that makes him uniquely positioned to walk non-specialist practitioners through notice, the grievance process, live hearings and cross-examination, and the appeal and litigation pathways under the 2020 Rules.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Title IX for the Non-Specialist: Representing Students and Employees in Campus Proceedings Under the 2020 Rules | 12:00pm – 2:10pm

This program provides practitioners with a practical framework for representing students and employees in Title IX proceedings under the 2020 rules. It examines the current Title IX landscape following the January 2025 vacatur of the 2024 rule, including why some educational institutions may still be relying on outdated policies. Attendees will explore the critical first 72 hours of a case, including interim measures, no-contact directives, and emergency removals. The program also addresses the advisor’s role, evidence review, and live hearings involving cross-examination at colleges and universities, helping attorneys identify important procedural considerations and protect clients from the earliest stages of a campus proceeding.

The program also examines the broader legal and professional risks that can arise alongside a Title IX matter. Attendees will consider parallel exposure involving criminal investigations, civil claims, and potential consequences for faculty and staff, as well as the relationship between campus proceedings, appeals, and subsequent litigation. The program addresses when a campus decision may support a lawsuit and highlights ethical considerations that can arise during representation. Topics include confidentiality, communicating with and representing students while dealing with parents, and working alongside non-lawyer advisors. The discussion is designed to help non-specialist attorneys approach Title IX matters with greater awareness of the procedural, legal, and ethical issues involved.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements Thu, October 15, 2026
Live Webcast
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses Tue, October 20, 2026
Live Webcast