Importer IEEPA Refunds on Finally Liquidated Entries: The Sue-or-Wait Decision and the CAPE Phase 3 Path

Nithya Nagarajan
Nithya Nagarajan | Husch Blackwell LLP

Nithya Nagarajan is a partner in the Washington, DC office of Husch Blackwell LLP, where she leads the firm's Trade Remedy and Trade Policy practice. Drawing on prior roles at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Commerce, she represents importers and exporters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Commerce, and the International Trade Commission.

Live Video-Broadcast: December 9, 2026

1.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

For an Importer That Never Sued, Waiting on Someone Else's Case Is a Decision With a Deadline

Importers that paid duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and never sued face a new landscape. CBP now runs a phased refund process called CAPE. Class motions in Freestyle World and V.O.S. Selections are pending, and so is Federal Circuit No. 26-1895. CIT Administrative Order 26-01 ended the automatic stay. For finally liquidated entries, the stated route to CAPE Phase 3 runs through a § 1581(i) action and a plaintiff-specific reliquidation order.

Miss the § 2636(i) accrual date, and the claim is gone. Assume a class covers the client, and its definition may exclude it. Wait on No. 26-1895, and a non-plaintiff may hold nothing. Let a broker or DDP seller act as importer of record, and the refund cannot be redirected. Skip ACH refund enrollment, and payment is held. Withdraw a protest too quickly, and a classification claim may be given up.

This program follows one importer from the sue-or-wait decision to the ACH deposit. You leave with a sue-or-wait decision tree, a per-theory deadline calendar, an annotated reliquidation order, and a pre-filing checklist. Each rests on practice judgment about filing, fees, and Phase 3 submissions, not on doctrine alone.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Per-Theory Accrual Deadlines
    Calendar § 2636(i) accrual by theory and tariff program, including the February 2027 date.
  • Class and Appeal Fit
    Test client fit against Freestyle World, V.O.S., and each No. 26-1895 outcome.
  • Filing Cost and Timing
    Weigh fees, break-even refund size, and § 1505 interest for a post-AO 26-01 filing.
  • Reading the Reliquidation Order
    Annotate deposit, authority, and IOR conditions, and apply the July 30 eligibility line.
  • Importer of Record Traps
    Spot refund risk when a broker, forwarder, or DDP seller is importer of record.
  • Getting the Refund Paid
    Clear validation and ACH refund enrollment, decide on open protests, and forecast offsets.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 9, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:10 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:10 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:10 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Nithya Nagarajan, Partner | Husch Blackwell LLP

Nithya Nagarajan is a partner in the Washington, DC office of Husch Blackwell LLP, where she leads the firm’s Trade Remedy and Trade Policy practice. Drawing on prior roles at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Commerce, she represents importers and exporters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Commerce, and the International Trade Commission. She also defends appeals in the U.S. Court of International Trade, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels, and the World Trade Organization.

  • Education & Credentials

Nithya served as Law Clerk to the Hon. Evan Wallach of the U.S. Court of International Trade from 2004 to 2006. She earned her J.D. cum laude from American University Washington College of Law, where she was on the International Law Review and served as Senior Associate for the First Year Moot Court Competition. She also holds an M.B.A. cum laude in Business and Finance and a B.A. in Political Science and Business, both from The George Washington University. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Maryland and before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Chambers USA ranks Nithya nationwide in International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy for 2025 and 2026, and the Chambers Global Guide recognizes her in the same area for 2026. The Legal 500 United States named her a Recommended lawyer for trade remedies and trade policy in 2025. She was named to the Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll with Honors in 2024 and 2025 and was a J.D. Supra Readers’ Choice Top Author in International Law in 2020 and 2024. During her government service, the Department of Commerce awarded her a Gold Medal (1997) and a Bronze Medal (1998) for her work on steel cases.

  • Professional Involvement

Nithya serves as Vice Chair of the International Trade Committee of the Customs & International Trade Bar Association and as Co-Chair of the Imports & Supply Chain Committee of the Association of Women in International Trade (since 2022). She sat on the Law360 Editorial Advisory Board for International Trade from 2024 to 2026 and is a member of the American Institute for International Steel, the American Bar Association, the Washington International Trade Association, and the South Asian Bar Association. Her speaking includes the 22nd Judicial Conference of the U.S. Court of International Trade (2024), the ATCC Advanced Topics in Customs Compliance Conference (2026), and a March 2026 firm webinar on the U.S. Supreme Court and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

  • Experience

Nithya served on the steering committee for the Section 301 litigation challenging the List 3 and List 4A tariffs on goods from China, and she has obtained Section 301 exclusions for U.S. importers. She identified $200 million in erroneous duty bills caused by a programming error in Commerce’s instructions to CBP and worked with Commerce to correct it, leaving the client paying less than $15,000 in duties. She has also guided importers through prior disclosures that ended with no penalty, a CBP RASA audit, and country-of-origin inquiries under the Colombia free trade agreement. In one matter she took Commerce’s inaction to the Court of International Trade and then secured a changed circumstances review that preserved a client’s zero deposit rate. Her trade remedy work includes a negative injury determination at the ITC on steel nails that spared importers potential duties, defense of exporters from China, India, Mexico, and Thailand, and negotiation of suspension agreements on behalf of Commerce.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Deciding Whether a Non-Plaintiff Importer Should File an IEEPA Refund Suit Now | Nithya Nagarajan | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session tests whether a non-plaintiff importer with finally liquidated IEEPA entries should file a § 1581(i) suit now. It covers § 2636(i) accrual, class fit, No. 26-1895 scenarios, and filing cost after AO 26-01, ending with a decision tree.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Turning an IEEPA Reliquidation Order into Paid Refunds Through CAPE Phase 3 | Nithya Nagarajan | 3:40pm – 4:10pm

This session takes an importer of record from a CIT reliquidation order to an ACH deposit through CAPE Phase 3. It covers order conditions, the July 30 line, broker or DDP importers of record, validation, ACH enrollment, protests, and offsets.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses Tue, October 20, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Fri, October 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay