Protecting Your Company from a New Wave of Consumer Class Actions Under California’s “Yelp Law”

Caren Decter
Caren Decter | Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Caren Decter is a Partner and Co-Chair of the Litigation Group at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, where she brings nearly two decades of experience representing clients in the advertising, art, consumer goods, and media and entertainment industries. Her practice spans intellectual property and complex contractual disputes, consumer class actions, white collar criminal matters, and emerging issues in data privacy and digital accessibility.

On-Demand: May 27, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
All-Access Pass

Free access to all CLE programs w/active subscription. Annual subscription only $395/yr.

Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Defend your clients against the surging wave of California Yelp Law class actions. Learn proven litigation strategies, key defenses, and audit techniques to neutralize plaintiff attacks before they strike.

What Will You Learn

Attorneys will learn the history and origins of California's Yelp Law, how courts have applied it, and litigation-focused strategies for companies to mitigate risk.

What Will You Gain

They will gain practical defenses, drafting strategies, and methods to audit online terms to protect companies from no-harm class actions and mass arbitrations.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Consumer abuses
    Specific consumer abuses prompted enactment of the statute originally intended to protect reviews.
  • Policy rationale
    The public policy rationale supports prohibiting non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts.
  • Weaponization trend
    Plaintiff firms transformed the shield statute into a sword against companies.
  • Mass arbitration
    Plaintiffs leverage mass arbitration threats alongside class actions seeking massive civil penalties.
  • IP distinctions
    Non-disparagement clauses differ from intellectual property protection language under the statute.
  • Enforcement threshold
    No private right of action exists without threat of enforcement or actual enforcement.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Caren Decter, Partner | Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Caren Decter is a Partner and Co-Chair of the Litigation Group at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, where she brings nearly two decades of experience representing clients in the advertising, art, consumer goods, and media and entertainment industries. Her practice spans intellectual property and complex contractual disputes, consumer class actions, white collar criminal matters, and emerging issues in data privacy and digital accessibility. Known for managing high-stakes litigation aggressively and efficiently, Caren is equally distinguished by her responsiveness and her talent for crafting creative, business-minded solutions that resolve disputes before they escalate into prolonged litigation.

  • Education & Credentials

Caren earned her J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, where she served as Articles Editor of the California Law Review. She received her B.A. summa cum laude from Washington University in St. Louis. She is admitted to practice in New York and New Jersey, as well as before the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and the District of New Jersey, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Caren is consistently recognized among the nation’s leading litigators. Her honors include selection to Best Lawyers in America (2024–2026), The Legal 500 (2024), and Super Lawyers New York Metro as a “Super Lawyer” (2021–2025) and previously as a “Rising Star” (2015–2017). She was also named to Benchmark Litigation’s 40 & Under Hot List in both 2019 and 2021. In recognition of her pro bono work, the Anti-Defamation League honored Caren and her colleagues with the Edward Brodsky Founders Award for their amicus brief opposing the Trump administration’s travel ban. As Co-Chair of the firm’s Litigation Group, she plays a central role in shaping strategy and mentoring attorneys across the practice.

  • Professional Involvement

Caren serves on the Board of Directors of the New York County Lawyers Association Foundation. She is also a member of the Consumer Litigation Committee of the American Bar Association and serves on the Copyright & Literary Property and Entertainment Law Committees of the New York City Bar Association. A frequent speaker and thought leader, Caren regularly presents at industry conferences and CLE programs on topics including state privacy law enforcement, the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), website accessibility, copyright developments following Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, and arbitration of consumer disputes. Her recent platforms include the IAB State Privacy Law Summit, DOC NYC, the Frankfurt Kurnit Tech Law Summit, and webinars hosted by myLawCLE and TechGC. She has authored articles for Law360, the New York Law Journal, and the American Bar Association.

  • Experience

Caren defends companies in some of today’s most active and consequential areas of litigation, including consumer class actions and mass arbitrations under federal and state consumer protection, unfair competition, and false advertising statutes, as well as claims under CIPA, the VPPA, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). She has secured notable victories including compelling arbitration of a VPPA class action against a sports streaming platform; obtaining dismissal of a $30 million art fraud complaint on summary judgment; defeating copyright claims against a leading online clearinghouse of stock 3D models; and securing dismissal on copyright preemption grounds of a competitor’s anti-reverse-engineering contract claim. She negotiated the settlement of one of the first public enforcement actions under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and routinely advises clients responding to CCPA Notice of Violation letters from the California Attorney General. Her broader practice has included representing a leading educational publisher in trademark and contract litigation against Vanderbilt University, a museum in a World War II restitution case, and an advertising agency in a criminal antitrust investigation. Caren also drafted a U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith on behalf of documentary filmmakers. Prior to joining Frankfurt Kurnit, Caren was an attorney at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, representing clients in complex commercial litigation. She began her career as a law clerk to the Honorable Colleen McMahon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Background and Origins of the Yelp Law | 1:00pm – 1:15pm

California’s Yelp Law emerged from documented consumer abuses where businesses used non-disparagement clauses to silence honest reviews. This session examines the statute’s legislative history, public policy rationale, and its place within broader consumer protection trends in California and nationwide.

SESSION 2 – From Shield to Sword: How Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Weaponized the Yelp Law | 1:15pm – 1:30pm

Originally a consumer shield, the Yelp Law has become a plaintiffs’ bar weapon. This session explores the litigation playbook, common fact patterns, key cases, and how attorneys leverage class action and mass arbitration threats against businesses.

SESSION 3 – Key Defenses and Litigation Strategies | 1:30pm – 1:45pm

This session examines critical defenses against Yelp Law claims, including arguments that no private right of action exists absent enforcement, distinctions between non-disparagement clauses and intellectual property protections, and the statute’s scope regarding consumer contracts.

SESSION 4 – How Can Companies Protect Themselves? | 1:45pm – 2:00pm

This session provides practical guidance for companies seeking to mitigate Yelp Law exposure, covering how to audit existing online terms and agreements, plus drafting strategies and best practices designed to avoid liability and litigation risk.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, July 9, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy Thu, July 16, 2026
Live Webcast
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, July 22, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, July 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay