Texts Aren’t Calls — Now What? Dismissal, Consent, and Certification in TCPA Text Litigation After Steidinger and Bradford

Aaron C. Tifft
Aaron C. Tifft
Hall Estill

Aaron C. Tifft is a Shareholder at Hall Estill in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where he has practiced since the beginning of his legal career. His litigation work spans property and real estate disputes, oil and gas matters, and the defense of claims brought under state and federal marketing regulations, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Ryan L. McBride
Ryan L. McBride
Kazerouni Law Group, APC

Ryan L. McBride is a Partner at Kazerouni Law Group, APC, where he manages the firm’s San Diego location and was named a partner in 2023. He is a licensed attorney in Arizona, California, Washington, Utah, and Florida, and his primary responsibility is managing a caseload in each of the five states in which he is licensed.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 23, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

One Circuit Has Ruled. The Other Direction Is Still Open.

The FCC long told courts that a text message was a telephone call. Loper Bright and McLaughlin ended that deference. On July 14, 2026, the Seventh Circuit acted: Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services holds Section 227(c)(5) does not reach text messages.

File in the Seventh Circuit now and the do-not-call count may not survive the pleadings. File in the Ninth, where Howard points the other way, and it likely does. Plead consent loosely after Bradford and classwide theories collapse; document consent in discovery and predominance becomes the fight.

You leave with a drafted Steidinger motion and a record preserved for appeal. You also get a current forum map, a consent-discovery plan covering vendor data and audit trails, and a candid certification read. These are judgment calls, not lookups.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Deference Collapse
    Loper Bright and McLaughlin remove the FCC’s binding authority over what “telephone call” means in the TCPA.
  • Statutory Argument
    Steidinger’s reading of Section 227(c)(5) is the argument to build on or dismantle at the pleadings.
  • Circuit Split
    Steidinger (7th Cir.) and Howard (9th Cir.) now point opposite directions on the same statutory question.
  • Motion Strategy
    Choose the forum, draft the Steidinger motion, and preserve the record for the appeal that follows.
  • Consent Pleading and Proof
    Bradford reshapes how consent is pleaded and how website forms, lead-generation records, vendor data, and audit trails are developed in discovery.
  • Certification and Resolution
    Predominance and common proof drive certification viability, litigation risk, settlement pressure, and state mini-TCPA exposure.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 23, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Aaron C. Tifft, Shareholder | Hall Estill

Aaron C. Tifft is a Shareholder at Hall Estill in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where he has practiced since the beginning of his legal career. His litigation work spans property and real estate disputes, oil and gas matters, and the defense of claims brought under state and federal marketing regulations, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. He has defended multiple clients against TCPA and OTSA class action claims, drawing on long-standing personal experience with technology and internet systems to counsel clients on marketing-communication compliance without disrupting their overall messaging strategy. He also handles commercial and residential landlord/tenant litigation and represents energy companies and public utilities in easement acquisition and eminent domain proceedings, including large gathering and transmission line projects across Oklahoma.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Tifft earned his J.D. with highest honors from the University of Tulsa College of Law in 2017, where he served as Editor-in-Chief of the Tulsa Law Review, worked as a student law clerk for the Honorable Jane Wiseman, and was named Most Outstanding Law Student in his graduating class. He received a B.S. in Media with a Public Relations emphasis, summa cum laude, from Oral Roberts University in 2011. He was admitted in Oklahoma in 2017 and is also admitted before the U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Oklahoma and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He received the Tulsa County Bar Association Young Lawyer of the Year Award in 2022 and has been recognized by Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in Civil Litigation: Defense. Within the firm he serves on the Recruitment & Diversity Committee, and he chairs the Pro Bono Committee of the Tulsa County Bar Association.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Tifft is a member of the Tulsa Chapter of Young Professionals in Energy and volunteers with the Tulsa County Bar Association’s Courthouse Assistance Program. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of Riverfield Country Day School.

  • Experience

Mr. Tifft has practiced at Hall Estill since 2017. His work includes the defense of TCPA and OTSA class actions, counseling on state and federal requirements for marketing communications, complex commercial and general litigation, all forms of commercial and residential landlord/tenant litigation, and eminent domain and easement acquisition matters for infrastructure projects, where he advises clients from early planning and dispute resolution through the complete eminent domain process.

 

Ryan L. McBride, Partner | Kazerouni Law Group, APC

Ryan L. McBride is a Partner at Kazerouni Law Group, APC, where he manages the firm’s San Diego location and was named a partner in 2023. He is a licensed attorney in Arizona, California, Washington, Utah, and Florida, and his primary responsibility is managing a caseload in each of the five states in which he is licensed. That caseload currently consists of multiple class action, mass tort, and complex civil matters, and he has recently argued a successful appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He practices in consumer protection because his passion is helping people, and he is conversant in Spanish.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. McBride attended Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, California, where he served as President of the Sports Law Society and as Academics Director for the Student Bar Association, and competed as a member of the school’s National Sports Law Negotiation Competition Team. He graduated cum laude from Arizona State University, where he was a Pat Tillman Scholar and President of the Student-Athlete Advisory Committee, and he later earned a Master’s degree from Arizona State University. He is admitted in Arizona, California, Utah, Washington, and Florida, and before the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. McBride has received the Wiley W. Manuel Certificate for Pro Bono Legal Services and the Pat Tillman Community Leadership Award, an honor he shared with Taitusi “Deuce” Lutui of the Arizona Cardinals and Shane Doan of the Phoenix Coyotes. He leads the firm’s San Diego office and was named a partner in the firm in 2023.

  • Professional Involvement

He is a member of the Maricopa County Bar Association, the San Diego County Bar Association, and the American Bar Association. Earlier in his career he volunteered at a local domestic violence restraining order clinic.

  • Experience

Before law school Mr. McBride played number one singles and doubles on the Arizona State University tennis team, then competed on the professional tennis tour before changing direction to serve in the Teach For America Corps while completing his Master’s degree. After law school he started and ran his own law firm. At Kazerouni Law Group he manages the San Diego location and a five-state caseload of class action, mass tort, and complex civil litigation, including appellate work in the Ninth Circuit.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Winning the TCPA Texts-Are-Not-Calls Motion to Dismiss After Loper Bright | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

The Supreme Court’s decisions in Loper Bright and McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson stripped the FCC of binding authority to tell district courts what “telephone call” means under the TCPA. On July 14, 2026, the Seventh Circuit became the first court of appeals to apply that framework, holding in Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services that Section 227(c)(5)’s do-not-call private right of action does not reach text messages. This session gives litigators the tools to build and defeat the “texts aren’t calls” motion to dismiss, map which districts remain favorable now that one circuit has spoken, and position cases for the broader textual fight that Steidinger left open in the TCPA.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Pleading, Proving, and Certifying TCPA Text Claims After Bradford | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session examines how plaintiffs and courts are adjusting to the Fifth Circuit’s Bradford decision and the broader post-Loper Bright TCPA landscape. Rather than focusing on defense-side decertification tactics, the program explores how consent allegations are being pleaded, how consent evidence is being developed in discovery, and how courts are evaluating predominance and common proof in text-message class actions. Attendees will learn practical strategies for structuring consent discovery, addressing individualized consent disputes, and evaluating class certification viability as federal courts continue to diverge on the scope of TCPA text protections.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay