The Other Side Has Crypto: Finding Digital Assets with Bank Records, Subpoenas, and Blockchain Tracing

Geoffrey Berg
Geoffrey Berg
Berg PC

Geoff Berg founded Berg PC and has spent three decades handling business, employment, civil, and cryptocurrency litigation at every stage, from filing suit through appeal, in courts across Texas. His practice today includes a dedicated crypto litigation group focused on fraud recovery and blockchain-related business disputes.

Andrew C. Adams
Andrew C. Adams
Steptoe LLP

Andrew C. Adams is a partner in Steptoe's New York office, where he advises companies and individuals on government and internal investigations, corporate governance, and white collar and regulatory matters. His practice concentrates on anti-money laundering compliance, U.S. economic countermeasures, and national security crisis response, informed by his service as the inaugural Director of the Department of Justice's Task Force KleptoCapture, the multi-agency group formed to enforce the sanctions and export controls imposed after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 25, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Blockchain Never Forgets. Most Discovery Requests Never Ask.

Cryptocurrency now shows up in divorce, fraud, judgment enforcement, and asset recovery matters as a matter of course. Public blockchains preserve a permanent, pseudonymous record of every transfer. Courts are already weighing clustering analysis after Sterlingov and third-party subpoena fights after Harper.

The stakes are procedural and immediate. Serve generic asset interrogatories, and undisclosed wallets stay undisclosed. Subpoena an exchange without the right framework, and privacy objections stall production. Wait to seek a freeze, and holdings move offshore before a TRO issues. Build a tracing methodology casually, and it may not survive a Daubert challenge.

This program delivers the working toolkit. Attendees build a bank-records-to-blockchain tracing sequence and crypto-specific discovery requests. They gain Rule 45 subpoena strategy for exchanges, freeze tactics, and enforcement through turnover orders, receivers, and contempt. A red-flag checklist and an expert-retention framework round out work product no summary can replace.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Blockchain As Evidence
    How permanence and pseudonymity make public blockchains a discoverable transaction record, and what that means for preservation.
  • Wallet Architecture
    Why the custodial versus self-custody distinction dictates whom you subpoena and what production you can compel.
  • Tracing Tools And Reliability
    Clustering heuristics from Chainalysis Reactor to free explorers, obfuscation techniques, and the admissibility debate after Sterlingov.
  • End-To-End Workflow
    A step-by-step tracing sequence from bank statements to blockchain explorer to a Daubert-ready expert report.
  • Crypto-Directed Discovery
    Interrogatories, document requests, tax returns, and Rule 45 exchange subpoenas after Harper that surface hidden holdings.
  • Freezes And Enforcement
    Pre-judgment TROs, stablecoin restraining notices, turnover orders, receivers, and contempt against debtors who will not disclose.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 25, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Geoffrey Berg, Founding Partner | Berg PC

Geoff Berg founded Berg PC and has spent three decades handling business, employment, civil, and cryptocurrency litigation at every stage, from filing suit through appeal, in courts across Texas. His practice today includes a dedicated crypto litigation group focused on fraud recovery and blockchain-related business disputes. He approaches every matter as a trial in the making, building strategy from a case’s inception rather than positioning for the fastest settlement, and he has compiled a record of significant trial results against major regional and national commercial trial firms.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Berg earned his J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center in 1994 and holds Bachelor of Arts degrees in Political Science and Journalism from New York University, both completed in 1992. He is licensed in Texas (1995), with prior admissions in Colorado (2007) and Pennsylvania (2009) now inactive. He is admitted before the United States District Courts for the Southern, Northern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas and the District of Colorado, and before the United States Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Tenth Circuits.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Berg has been recognized by The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation for ten consecutive years and holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell. He was selected to Texas Super Lawyers from 2004 to 2023, named among the Best Lawyers in Texas by The Wall Street Journal, and received the Who’s Who Lifetime Achievement Award in 2019. The 151st Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas appointed him Special Commissioner to rule on eminent domain matters, and he is a Texas Bar Foundation Life Fellow.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Berg is a member of the State Bar of Texas, the Colorado Bar Association, the Pennsylvania Bar Association, and the Houston Bar Association’s Commercial and Consumer Law Section. His civic commitments include prior board service with the Anti-Defamation League, life membership in the NAACP, board membership with Atlas Scholars, and service on the Harris County Democratic Party’s Judicial Screening Committee.

  • Experience

Mr. Berg’s results include representing Samsung Electronics in a royalty contract dispute against Texas Instruments that settled after three weeks of trial, and representing plaintiffs in a mass action against the Marriott Corporation that settled for $425 million. He led the Texas end of multi-state litigation that vacated two confessions of judgment totaling nearly $20 million, and he obtained a $5.4 million declaratory judgment, including attorneys’ fees, in a $5 million escrow ownership dispute. His current crypto litigation work spans fraud recovery matters as well as the firm’s investigations concerning Meta crypto scam advertisements and the Coinbase data breach.

 

Andrew C. Adams, Partner | Steptoe LLP

Andrew C. Adams is a partner in Steptoe’s New York office, where he advises companies and individuals on government and internal investigations, corporate governance, and white collar and regulatory matters. His practice concentrates on anti-money laundering compliance, U.S. economic countermeasures, and national security crisis response, informed by his service as the inaugural Director of the Department of Justice’s Task Force KleptoCapture, the multi-agency group formed to enforce the sanctions and export controls imposed after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Adams earned his J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 2008 and his B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin in 2004. He is admitted to the New York bar. He clerked for the Hon. John M. Walker, Jr. of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and for the Hon. Mary A. McLaughlin of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

  • Recognition & Leadership

At the Department of Justice, Mr. Adams served as the inaugural Director of Task Force KleptoCapture within the Office of the Deputy Attorney General and as acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division, overseeing the Division’s sanctions, export control, and national security cyber investigations. At the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, he rose to Co-Chief of the Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit after serving as Deputy Chief of the Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Unit.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Adams speaks frequently on sanctions, digital asset enforcement, and cross-border investigations, with recent engagements for ACAMS, the American Conference Institute’s New York Forum on Economic Sanctions, the Federal Bar Association, Lex Mundi’s Cross-Border Investigations Practice Group, and The Digital Chamber. He is a regular contributor to Steptoe’s blockchain and international compliance publications.

  • Experience

As a federal prosecutor from 2013 to 2023, Mr. Adams investigated, charged, and tried cases centered on the integrity of financial institutions, transnational organized crime, and sophisticated money laundering operations moving through both traditional and crypto platforms. His matters included the first criminal case charged under the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act and prosecutions involving looted antiquities and cultural property fraud. He also served as one of the Southern District of New York’s asset forfeiture coordinators, advising prosecutors across the office on civil and criminal forfeiture. Before his government service, he practiced as a litigation associate at an international law firm headquartered in New York.

Agenda

Session 1 – Crypto Tracing Fundamentals: Wallets, Exchanges, and the Blockchain Paper Trail | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

Opens with why every litigator needs a working knowledge of crypto, addressing the growth of cryptocurrency in litigation and asset recovery, common scenarios spanning divorce, fraud, judgment enforcement, and asset recovery, and the challenges posed by pseudonymous transactions. The session then turns to crypto tracing fundamentals: public blockchains and transaction records, custodial vs. self-custody wallets, the bank records to blockchain tracing workflow, and evidentiary and admissibility considerations.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session 2 – Discovery, Subpoenas, and Court Orders That Reach Hidden Digital Assets | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

Covers discovery strategies for hidden digital assets, including interrogatories, document requests, depositions, Rule 45 subpoenas to exchanges, tax returns and financial records, and overcoming discovery objections. The session then addresses freezing and recovering cryptocurrency through TROs and preliminary injunctions, turnover orders and post-judgment remedies, and jurisdictional issues, Civil RICO, and forfeiture considerations, closing with practical takeaways: red flags of undisclosed crypto holdings, a tracing workflow checklist, and when to retain forensic experts.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General Hours

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay